Skip to main content

marvel - Why doesn't Doctor Strange remove the Infinity Gauntlet from Thanos?


Doctor Strange seemingly has the ability to open portals wherever he wants. We see at the beginning of Infinity War what happens when he closes a portal and someone isn't fully through it.


Is there any reason why he can't open a portal around the left-elbow of Thanos, and then close it?


I realize that Thanos probably wouldn't allow this to happen normally,



but when he is mostly asleep, and Tony and Spider-Man are pulling on the gauntlet, Doctor Strange has ample opportunity, and plenty of space to just sever Thanos' arm.




Why doesn't he?



Answer



Not everything or everyone is equally tough


Fenrir’s teeth can penetrate Hulk’s skin (and that’s cinematically treated as pretty surprising), but when Bruce Banner tries to shoot himself in the mouth with a bullet, it will just bounce off the Hulk’s digestive tract.



BRUCE: I got low. I didn’t see an end, so I put a bullet in my mouth and the other guy spit it out!


The Avengers



I think this demonstrates fairly well that “flesh” is not just one thing in the MCU. Some creatures are far, far more durable than others, and Thanos is probably near the top of that list. The flesh of a mutated berserker or an alien god are very different from the body of a regular human being.



Just because some of Thanos’s minions are fragile enough that a portal can fairly easily sever their limbs, doesn’t mean that Thanos himself is.


This is a common fantasy theme, particularly in comic books. On Supergirl, for instance, regular bullets might just bounce off of her, but an energy axe is a different matter.


Are we to assume that a sling-ring portal can sever anything, no matter its durability? Hulk, Thanos, even the Infinity Stones themselves? The implicit assumption in the question is that the sling portals simply “cut through” anything, that there’s no force involved in their closing, but we don’t have anything to suggest that this is the case, and a lot to suggest it’s probably not.


The Power Stone might have increased his durability even further


Recall that in Guardians of the Galaxy, the Power Stone greatly increased Ronan’s durability. To quote the Wiki:



Similarly to Malekith while he was wielding the Aether, Ronan’s durability was enhanced while bearing his Power Stone-infused Cosmi-Rod. He withstood a direct, close range shot from the Hadron Enforcer, with no apparent injury as well as not being at all affected by the crashing of the Dark Aster as he walked away from the massive wreckage of his ship as if he had landed without problems.



The Power Stone was the first stone that Thanos acquired. Whatever his ordinary strength and durability, it would have been increased beyond all reason. And, as noted in the description, the other stones may have increased Thanos’s resistance to damage as well.


Strange had tried other things



As noted in the other answer, the Time Stone has allowed Doctor Strange to see all the possible outcomes. All we can say is that something would have gone wrong if they’d tried that. Perhaps, indeed, the thing that would have gone wrong would be that the portal wouldn’t be able to sever Thanos’s skin before he could react, but perhaps any number of other things would have gone wrong.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...