In the Harry Potter universe, are snakes magical creatures?

It seems to be commonly accepted in discussions on this site (viz. the first two answers to this question) that there is the magical world and there is the muggle world and there are strict boundaries between the two; that anything that muggles know about is completely non-magical. But this doesn't hold up to events as depicted in the books: wizards commonly traverse through and interact with the muggle world (The Ministry of Magic is in London – think about all the routine interactions that implies on a daily basis for all the people who walk in through the public lavatories). Wizards are born to muggle parents. The Night Bus drives on Muggle roads. It's always the case that the magical world is right under the noses of the muggles, but the muggles are just bewitched into not noticing the magical things, or rather, the magical side of things, all around them.

With that in mind, we have plenty of evidence that animals in Harry Potter are not the same mundane species as we know them. Similar to Are Owls in Harry Potter universe normal ones?, are all snakes in the Harry Potter universe magical creatures or normal animals?

Consider Parseltongue, a complete language that only snakes, magical creatures resembling snakes (the Basilisk) and wizards can speak. Furthermore, the ability to speak Parseltongue is strictly inherited or imparted with dark magic – no one can learn to speak it. Dumbledore learned to understand it, but could not speak it, and Harry lost the ability to speak and understand it when Voldemort’s piece of soul inside him was killed.¹

Here in the real world, there is tons of ongoing research into understanding animal communication as it relates to human language (and even understanding human language itself). The smartest, most communicative animals discovered have impressive skills, but that's still orders of magnitude away from every snake being able to hold a conversation (even a simple one like Harry has in the zoo).

Without devolving into arguments on the semantics of unknown phenomena vs. magic, what is the explanation for snakes being able to talk? The fact that muggles in the Harry Potter universe haven't discovered how to talk to snakes is circumstantial evidence that it's not just hyper-intelligence.

The distinction hinges, I think, on why Parseltongue is magic-based. The simplest explanation that makes sense to me is that snakes are part magical². The next simplest is that Parselmouths share ancestry with snakes.

¹: J.K. Rowling Live Chat, Bloomsbury.com, July 30, 2007: http://www.accio-quote.org/articles/2007/0730-bloomsbury-chat.html

²: I suppose the simplest explanation is actually that J.K. Rowling wrote it that way for purposes of the plot and didn't consider all the ramifications of the existence of magic on reality as science currently understands it. (Consider Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality.) But still! I'd like to know why Parseltongue is magic-based instead of a pure linguistics challenge.

Answer

In Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, snakes aren’t mentioned as all being magical creatures. If they were supposed to all be considered magical, it should have been mentioned somewhere in there.

A few different species of magical serpents are mentioned; however, simply being a snake doesn’t seem to be enough to classify a creature as magical. There’s also a bit of circumstantial evidence - if snakes were all classified as magical, it stands to reason that, similar to how the individual species of dragons aren’t specified as “magical” dragons since all dragons are inherently magical, the individual types wouldn’t be referred to as “magical” serpents since all serpents would be magical.

In addition, none of the “regular” snakes we see (the one Harry meets at the zoo and the one Harry conjures in the duel, for example) seemed to do anything that would be considered magical, other than understanding more complicated conversations than might be expected when spoken to in Parseltongue, and being smarter than expected.

The snake that Harry frees at the zoo doesn’t seem to have any magical abilities. However, it was intelligent enough to read the sign saying it was native to Brazil and bred in captivity, and understand what it meant.

It seems, therefore, that snakes probably aren’t magical creatures, but simply possess a high degree of intelligence in the Harry Potter universe.

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

harry potter - How could Expelliarmus beat Avada Kedavra?

I want to be very careful about how I ask this question – I am not asking How did Voldemort die? [CLOSED] Below the text is the relevant passages from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows if anyone wants to review them (I'm sorry for the amount of text). How did Expelliarmus beat Avada Kedavra and kill Voldemort? I feel the reason Harry's Expelliarmus overpowered Voldemort's Avada Kedavra curse has to do with who was master of the Elder Wand and how the Elder Wand works. I've always had trouble understanding fully how the Elder Wand works, though. How much did the fact that Voldemort never truly won or mastered the Elder Wand factor into how Expelliarmus reacted to Avada Kedavra and caused Avada Kedavra to rebound and kill Voldemort? An answer based in book canon would be especially welcome, but any canon source really is fine. Harry heard the high voice shriek as he, too, yelled his best hope to the heavens, pointing Draco’s wand: ‘ Avada Kedavra !’ ‘ Expelliarmus !...

tolkiens legendarium - Difference between elves and dwarves blacksmithing in the Lord of the Rings

Both the elves and the dwarves were famous for their metal work in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, but what is the difference between what they made, and which one had the better skill of making amours and swords? Answer James Christopher's answer sums up the second part of your question well, but as to the difference in what they made, a little more detail is needed. Once the Elves learned to forge with steel, the shape of the sword changed, now being able to take on the form of a great broadsword or a light and agile curved sword. Additionally, they took great pride in decorating their swords. As we see in the Lord of the Rings , some swords like Sting had magical properties such as glowing blue when orcs are near. As far as the use of Mithril, lotr.wikia has two contradictory passages: Thus, Elven blades became renowned as great weapons, capable of performing deeds beyond the skill of their handlers and were even more glorious when the use of Mithril was allowed to the Elves. ...

game of thrones - Is Syrio Forel dead?

In the episode 'The Pointy End' (Season 1 Episode 8) when Arya runs from the Lannister guards you hear the sound of a sword being dropped (around 4:56): [embedded content] After that neither Syrio or Ser Meryn Trant is never mentioned or seen in the show again, except when Arya mentions to the Hound that Ser Meryn Trant killed Syrio. Is there any mention in the books that Syrio actually dies?

Blog

Search This Blog