Skip to main content

star trek - Why would Voyager require 75 years to return home?


The Star Trek: Voyager Wikipedia article says:



(...) show is initially set on the other side of the Milky Way galaxy, 75,000 light-years from Earth (...) and (...) Voyager to make the estimated 75-year journey home.




This is confirmed by Captain Janeway, who says in the first episode, that (I don't have access to direct quotation) "even with maximum speed, our travel home will take approximately 75 years" (unless they find some "shortcuts"). The general assumption here is, that Voyager will be travelling approximately 75 years until it reach Earth.


In Warp drive Wiki article, The Next Generation onwards section it is said that:



The Intrepid-class starship Voyager has a maximum sustainable cruising speed of warp 9.975.



According to my calculations (correct me, if I'm wrong), 9.975 warp is around 1680 times light speed. This theoretically means, that traveling entire year with constant maximum speed would allow Voyager to pass 1680 light years, not 1000 (not mentioning these shortcuts, they used like subspace corridors, trans-warp technology etc.).


This means, that Voyager would actually need only around 45 years to reach home (pass 75,000 light years distance). It would be impossible to travel all the time at maximum speed, but that would be compensated by using "extra additions" (subspace corridors, trans-warp etc.).


What am I missing?



Answer




They were (presumably) using the old warp scale. From later in the Wikipedia article you linked:



Exact velocities were given in a few episodes, one being "Relativity", where Kathryn Janeway describes Voyager's velocity at warp factor 9.975. Voyager was about 70,000 light-years away from home, and crew would often use "75 years" as the time it would take to get back home at top speed. This means the Voyager series used the old method of Warp calculation. 70,000/9.9753 is roughly 71 years. Accounting for delays to refuel, repair, restock and downtime, 75 years is a logical rounding.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed....
Post a Comment
Read more

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...
Post a Comment
Read more