Skip to main content

harry potter - What happened to Cornelius Fudge after he resigned from his post of Minister for Magic?


Is there any reference to say where he went or what he did after leaving his post? What actually happened during his life from that point?



Answer



In Half-Blood Prince, when Fudge and Scrimgeour visit the Muggle Prime Minister, we learn that he’s still working as an envoy to the Muggles.


I am not aware of any canon sources that describe what happened to him after this.


Specifically, I do not know of anything in the books, films, a J.K. Rowling interview or Pottermore update that explains what happened to Fudge. We see him briefly at Dumbledore’s funeral, but nothing is said of what he’s doing.




That makes for a rather boring answer, so a little speculation.


I don’t think he would have stayed on as envoy to the Muggles. Voldemort has no need for such a person in a post-Scrimgeour Ministry. I also don’t think the Order would have trusted him, so he’d probably be on his own.



His final year at the Ministry – denying Voldemort’s return – was almost certainly a big help to Voldemort, so I don’t think he’d get murdered. He also wasn’t a particularly important target, and wouldn’t merit Death Eater attention. I think he retired and fled the country, and probably kept his head low.


What about after the War? Dumbledore hints at one possibility:



“I tell you now — take the steps I have suggested, and you will be remembered, in office or out, as one of the bravest and greatest Ministers of Magic we have ever known. Fail to act — and history will remember you as the man who stepped aside and allowed Voldemort a second chance to destroy the world we have tried to rebuild!”


— Goblet of Fire, chapter 36 (The Parting of the Ways)



We know that Fudge, and more generally the Second War, was based upon Chamberlain’s Government:



About the relationship between September-11 and Harry Potter, Rowling denied any influence and recognizes who was the true inspiration for the Minister Cornelius Fudge: “My model of the world after Voldemort’s return was, directly, the government of Neville Chamberlain in Great Britain during the Second World War, when he tried to minimize the menace of the Nazi regime for political convenience.”


— J.K. Rowling talks Cornelius Fudge in new interview (translation from Spanish)




I think what happened to Fudge is the same as what happened to Chamberlain. In World War Two, Chamberlain tried to appease Hitler, and resigned when Hitler made his true intentions clear. Chamberlain also stayed on as a member of Churchill’s war cabinet, not unlike Fudge’s role in Scrimgeour’s Ministry.


Chamberlain died of cancer shortly after he resigned, but got a positive eulogy from Churchill:



Whatever else history may or may not say about these terrible, tremendous years, we can be sure that Neville Chamberlain acted with perfect sincerity according to his lights and strove to the utmost of his capacity and authority, which were powerful, to save the world from the awful, devastating struggle in which we are now engaged. This alone will stand him in good stead as far as what is called the verdict of history is concerned.


— Upon the death of Neville Chamberlain, Winston Churchill (November 1940)



(In this analogy, Dumbledore corresponds to Churchill, so falls apart here.)


Fudge would never be remembered as well as Chamberlain. Both of them tried to deny the possibility of war, but Fudge tried to discredit both Harry and Dumbledore while doing so. That’s more than just burying your head in the sand.


I think he would have retired in relative obscurity, and just as Chamberlain is synonymous with appeasement, so Fudge would become synonymous with criminal blindness, and actively fighting those who were trying to tell him the truth. I’m sure he’d be disappointed, but it’s what he deserves.



My alternative theory is that he went to start a chocolate factory.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...