Skip to main content

the witcher - Was Renfri really cursed or not?


In the short story "The Lesser Evil" (the third story in the collection The Last Wish by Andrzej Sapkowski), Geralt becomes involved in a feud between the wizard Stregobor and the princess Renfri. Each of them asks the witcher to help them kill the other, saying it would be 'the lesser evil'. Geralt



refuses to involve himself either way, until towards the end when he realises Renfri and her companions plan to murder innocent townsfolk at the market, and kills them all to stop this.



Towards the beginning of the story, Geralt and Stregobor argue over whether Eltibald's theory of cursed women was true or whether the women such as Renfri were only victimised or righteously vengeful. Stregobor held that they were all monsters with an insatiable urge to kill, but Geralt said this was nonsense. In Renfri's case at least, she had good reason to hate Stregobor, so her desire to kill him doesn't prove that she was indeed a cursed monster. But in the end, who was right in the debate?


Was Renfri, and the others like her, a cursed monster or not?



Geralt's decision to kill her doesn't prove that she was, because the way I read it, the 'greater evil' he was trying to avoid was the murder of the townsfolk, not her existence.




There's also this exchange which I didn't understand:



Geralt retreated and raised his hand, arranging his fingers in the Sign.


Renfri laughed hoarsely. "It doesn't affect me. Only the sword will."


"Renfri," he repeated. "Go. If we cross blades, I- I won't be able-"


"I know," she said, "But I, I can't do anything else. I just can't. We are what we are, you and I."



That might throw some light on my question, if it can be understood and interpreted properly.


Apologies if this is answered in a later story. I've only got into the Witcher series recently, after answering a couple of questions about it on this site.




Answer



It's unknown


During the conversation with Stregobor, Geralt argues that the fact that someone is willing to be evil shouldn't be explained by magic or mutation - he gives the example of some old king that "can't fall asleep without the sound of someone being tortured to death".


The theme of this story (and a few others if I remember right) is Nature vs Nurture with Geralt (and Sapkowski) leaning strongly towards the latter: Humans, dwarves, mutants, elves are made evil, not born. Yes, Renfri is evil and killing her is lesser evil than letting her murder the villagers, but she has chosen that path rather than having been forced to by some sort of curse: she has been exiled from her palace, raped, forced to live the live of an outcast with seven gnomes, and now she has a chance to finally pay back one responsible for completely f***ing her life!


In the end we don't know whether she was a mutant or not, because Geralt forbids Stregobor to make the autopsy, but once again in the light of the story it's supposed to mean that it doesn't matter what she was, but what she became.



“People," Geralt turned his head, "like to invent monsters and monstrosities. Then they seem less monstrous themselves. When they get blind-drunk, cheat, steal, beat their wives, starve an old woman, when they kill a trapped fox with an axe or riddle the last existing unicorn with arrows, they like to think that the Bane entering cottages at daybreak is more monstrous than they are. They feel better then. They find it easier to live.”



The fact that the sign doesn't work for her might suggest that there is something inhuman in her, but on the other hand we know from Stregobor that after him imprisoning her in crystal she developed some sort of magic resistance (so once again there is a question of whether it was an inborn ability of a "monster" or one gained by a regular human).


In the first "Witcher" game (in a standalone short adventure), we meet another girl with story similar to Renfri - she also has been born during the Black Sun and has been treated as cursed and exiled, returning now for revenge. If you'd try to stop her, she would say that "she is unable to forgive" and you are forced to kill her, but if you'd help her, the after credits information says that she became a wise queen and her country flourished under her rule.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...