Skip to main content

Basilisk petrification in Harry Potter; what happens?


In Harry Potter the fearsome Basilisk had the ability to instantly kill anyone unfortunate enough to directly glimpse its eyes. But in the event that you were to gaze indirectly into its eyes you would be afflicted with complete petrification.


In the world of science, petrification is



the process by which organic material is converted into stone through the replacement of the original material and the filling of the original pore spaces with minerals.



However, in the magical world of Harry Potter, I doubt that such a mundane process is what happens when caught by a Basilisk's stare.


So what then is it that happens to these petrified people?



Is there an actual physical change that takes place (taking on the physical aspects of stone: hardness, brittleness, coldness etc), or is the effect more psychosomatic (physically the person is fine, but they become so terrified that they are mentally locked into inaction)?



Answer



First, let's examine what the books tell us.


In Chamber of Secrets chapter 9, Argus Filch describes his cat as “all stiff and frozen” when she is Petrified.


In chapter 10, Harry meets the Petrified Colin Creevey in the hospital wing.



Harry's stomach gave a horrible lurch. Slowly and carefully, he raised himself a few inches so he could look at the statue on the bed. A ray of moonlight lay accross its staring face.


It was Colin Creevey. He eyes were wide and his hands were stuck up in front of him, holding his camera.


[…]


[…] Then Dumbledore leaned forward and prised the camera out of Colin's rigid grip.




In chapter 11, Harry finds two victims Petrified:



Justin Finch-Fletchey was lying on the floor, rigid and cold, a look of shock frozen on his face, his eyes staring blankly at the ceiling. And that wasn't all. Next to him was another figure, the strangest sight Harry had ever seen.


It was Nearly Headless Nick, no longer pearly-white and transparent, but black and smoky, floating immobile and horizontal, six inches off the floor.



In chapter 14, when Hermione and Penelope are petrified



Hermione lay utterly still, her eyes open and glassy.




In chapter 16, we learn a bit more when Harry and Ron visit the Petrified Hermione in the hospital wing.



Madam Pomfrey let them in, but reluctantly.


‘There's just no point talking to a Petrified person,’, she said, and they had to admit she was right when they'd taken their seat next to Hermione. It was plain that Hermione didn't have the faintest inkling that she had visitors, and that they might just as well tell her bedside cabinet not to worry for all good it would do.


[…]


[…] Hermione's hand was clamped so tightly around the paper that Harry was sure he was going to tear it.



This suggests that Hermione wasn't aware of her surroundings, though I'm not sure how Harry would be able to tell this about a person who's magically paralyzed. This appears different from the paralysis spell (Petrificius Totalus): when Malfoy casts that on Harry in Prince chapter 7, Harry is aware of his surroundings. (Hermione casts the same spell on Neville in Stone chapter 16, but the situation is less clear.)


Based on the meeting with Hermione alone, I could imagine that the Basilisk's Petrification effect only paralyzes you on your entire body just like this spell, but Madam Pomfrey magically makes the victims unconscious for it would be very inconvenient to them to be paralyzed and conscious for months. However, the description of Justin's attack makes it clear that Justin's body was cold, so the basilisk's stare can't be just an ordinary paralysis effect, there is a physical change.


In summary, a Petrified person becomes paralyzed on his whole body, including his head, his body becomes rigid and cold, and the person becomes unconscious.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...