Skip to main content

star wars - Why was Vader talking about "Rebel transmissions" in Episode IV when he saw the data tape being passed in Rogue One?


In A New Hope, Darth Vader on Tantive IV says: “several rebel transmissions were beamed aboard this ship from rebel spies…”.


Except that, in Rogue One, we see that the plans were NOT beamed onto Tantive IV - it was docked inside Mon Calamari flagship, and the plans were physically sneaker-netted through a door from one rebel to another as a data tape - witnessed by Darth Vader!.


Vader clearly knew what the tape was from the novelization:




The voice of a stormtrooper spoke to him through his comlink. “A data tape was recorded on the bridge just before we boarded. No sign of it here.”


[...]


The security door opened a mere crack and rebel hands shoved the tape through. Vader reached through life and matter and air and by will alone he pulled. He fueled his will with rage and fear and need. It was enough to tear the rebel from the door and drop him at Vader’s feet.


But it was not enough to claim the tape.


He grasped the rebel sprawled before him by the throat, lifted him and stared at him through bloody lenses. “Where,” Vader demanded, “are they taking it?”



Is there an explanation for this discrepancy?



Answer



Either he thought Tantive IV was an escape vessel, not its own ship, or he didn't see the data tape



Pablo Hidalgo has been asked this question several times on Twitter (once by yours truly), but his most helpful response is probably this long Twitter thread from late December 2016; in it, Hidalgo pretty much confirms that this is an inherent contradiction between the film and the novelization:


enter image description here



@TheDonkeyDrip "As particle bolts shot toward him, he watched a data tape pass between desperate soldiers."


@pablohidalgo Yeah, it has the stormtrooper tell him as well. I was referencing the movie.



He does provide a rationalization for this earlier in the conversation:


enter image description here



@TheDonkeyDrip but then why is he so adamant about "beamed transmissions" if he saw the physical data tape?



@pablohidalgo Did he see it?


@TheDonkeyDrip The official novelization says he did.


@pablohidalgo Novel also has him view the Tantive as an escape vessel of the cruiser. Cuts on either side of semantics.



The passage he references is probably this one from the novel:



"Where," Vader demanded, "are they taking it?"


The reply was a strangled whisper. "Away from here," the rebel said. "Away from you."


Vader clenched his gloved hand until the man's neck snapped. Then he tossed the body aside. He activated his comlink and barked to his stormtroopers, "Find their escape vessel."


Rogue One: A Star Wars Story - Official Novelization Epilogue




So you have two options:




  1. He didn't see the tape. Wouldn't be the first time a novelization got something wrong; they're normally based on early drafts of the script, so perhaps this was an error that just got caught too late to fix in both versions. As Hidalgo reminds us:


    enter image description here



    Think of a novelization as an adaptation of canonical events.


    Because of how and when they're written, there will always be differences.


    In cases of contradiction, defer to the movie.






  2. He didn't see Tantive IV as an independent vessel. This is an admittedly weak rationalization, but if Tantive IV is an extension of the Profundity, then Vader's statement makes perfect sense.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...