Skip to main content

Why is Harry taking Divination in Year 4?



"Double Divination this afternoon," Harry groaned, looking down. Divination was his least favorite subject, apart from Potions. Professor Trelawney kept predicting Harry's death, which he found extremely annoying.


"You should have given it up like me, shouldn't you?" said Hermione briskly, buttering herself some toast. "Then you'd be doing something sensible like Arithmancy."



Hermione's got a good point there.


WHY on earth would Harry continue taking that unscientific woo of a class? "Easy A"?



Answer



I reviewed Prisoner of Azkaban, Goblet of Fire, Order of the Phoenix, and Half-Blood Prince. Here's what seems to be going on.


I think Divination was compulsory through fifth year, until students were post-O.W.L.s¹. In Prisoner of Azkaban, Hermione is allowed to drop Divination halfway through the school year. Just as an exception was made to allow Hermione to use a Time Turner to attend ten classes, as I looked through the available info, it seems another exception was made and Hermione was allowed to drop a compulsory class. It would seem certain lessons were compulsory during years three, four, and five, but in order to move on to the N.E.W.T. level courses, minimum grades had to be achieved.




The distribution of timetables was more complicated than usual this year, for Professor McGonagall needed first to confirm that everybody had achieved the necessary O.W.L. grades to continue with their chosen N.E.W.T.s.

Half-Blood Prince - page 165 - Bloomsbury - chapter 9, The Half-blood Prince



If Harry could have dropped Divination during his third year, he surely would have -- he hated Divination with the passion of a thousand fiery suns! So this may be another indicator that Divination was a compulsory class.


I think the main point of J.K. Rowling purposefully showing us a lot of scenes of Professor Trelawney and Divination, and Harry's reaction to Trelawney and all that she represents was set up a guise that Trelawney was a fraud, inept, ridiculous, and ditzy. So when it's revealed that it was Sybill Trelawney who made the prophecy that the entire series is built around, it's a bit of a surprise and a Whoa! moment to both the reader and Harry.



A figure rose out of it, draped in shawls, her eyes magnified to enormous size behind her glasses, and she revolved slowly, her feet in the basin. But when Sybill Trelawney spoke, it was not in her usual ethereal, mystic voice, but in the harsh, hoarse tones Harry had heard her use once before:

‘The one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord approaches ... born to those who have thrice defied him, born as the seventh month dies ... and the Dark Lord will mark him as his equal, but he will have power the Dark Lord knows not ... and either must die at the hand of the other for neither can live while the other survives ... the one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord will be born as the seventh month dies ...’

Order of the Phoenix - page 741 - Bloomsbury - chapter 37, The Lost Prophecy



I think if all the pieces are put together, Harry took Divination in year four because it was 1) compulsory and 2) an important part of the build-up to the revelation of Trelawney's prophecy.


ETA: ¹At the end of their second year at Hogwarts, students are required to choose a minimum of two more subjects from the following list: Arithmancy, Muggle Studies, Divination, Study of Ancient Runes and Care of Magical Creatures. POTTERMORE - BOOK 1 - CHAPTER 6 - *Talons and Tea Leaves (screenshot).



So, when Harry picked Divination as one of his two elective classes, Divination became compulsory for him through the end of book five. As this is when the prophecy is revealed, and Harry earned a "P" (Poor) on his Divination O.W.L., there is no need for J.K. Rowling to continue showing the same scene of Harry hating Divination to the reader. McGonagall would never have let Harry into N.E.W.T.-level Divination anyway, even if -- for some reason that I can't even begin to fathom -- Harry had wanted to continue with Divination.


So, a small distinction, but one nonetheless: Divination was compulsory if it was a chosen elective. This is consistent with my existing answer, so I'll leave it as is.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more