Skip to main content

harry potter - How and when was the statue head Portkey to Hogwarts set up?


After the battle in the Ministry, Professor Dumbledore sends Harry to Hogwarts using a Portkey. The Portkey is a part of the statue in the "Fountain of magical brethern" in the atrium of the Ministry of Magic, and sends Harry to the Hogwarts headmaster's office. Quoting Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix chapter 36.



He [Dumbledore] walked away from the pool to the place where the golden wizard's head lay on the floor. He pointed his wand at it and the muttered, ‘Portus.’ The head glowed blue and trembled noisily against the wooden floor for a few seconds, then became still once more.


‘Now see here, Dumbledore!’ said Fudge, as Dumbledore picked up the head and walked back to Harry carrying it. ‘You haven't got authorization for that Portkey! You can't do things like that right in front of the Minister for Magic, you – you –’




Did Professor Dumbledore set up the Portkey then and there? Or was it instead a Portkey set up previously, and he merely activated it with that “Portus” incantation?


Hogwarts had magical protection set up so you can't easily enter using a Portkey. If Professor Dumbledore quickly set up the Portkey right there and then, how did he get past the protection? If the Portkey had been set up previously, did they make sure it couldn't be misused to breach the security of Hogwarts?


See also Who can make a portkey that goes into Hogwarts? and In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix it seems Dumbledore makes a portkey that only Harry can use. Am I interpreting this correctly?



Answer



When did Dumbledore set up the Portkey?


It seems that the Portus charm creates a Portkey at the point of casting. We see Dumbledore use it earlier in the same book:



Dumbledore was now rummaging in a cupboard behind Harry and Ron. He emerged from it carrying a blackened old kettle, which he placed carefully upon his desk. He raised his wand and murmured “Portus”; for a moment the kettle trembled, glowing with an odd blue light, then it quivered to a rest, as solidly black as ever.


— Order of the Phoenix, chapter 22 (St. Mungo’s Hospital for Magical Maladies and Injuries)




Unless Dumbledore was extraordinarily prescient and negligent, there’s no way that he could have foreseen the need for this Portkey. It follows that Portus is creating a Portkey.


Thus, Dumbledore must be turning the head into a Portkey at the point of casting Portus; he wasn’t activating a pre-existing Portkey.


Also note that the statue was only decapitated when Harry was fighting Bellatrix. Once Dumbledore arrives, he’s engaged with fighting Bellatrix and Voldemort. When would he have turned the head into a Portkey? He certainly wouldn’t stop mid-duel to do it.


How did he set it up?


Using the Portus charm.


(The HP Wiki has a screenshot from the Charms O.W.L. in the Order of the Phoenix movie which identifies this as a charm.)


How did Dumbledore get past the Hogwarts protections?


Dumbledore is the school headmaster, and set up many of the protections around the school. It seems logical that he can likewise undo them. As he says in the Half-Blood Prince film, “Being me has its privileges”. There are other canon examples of Dumbledore undoing the school protections:



  • Creating a Portkey for Harry and the Weasleys in Order of the Phoenix, during the incident quoted above. This has to leave Hogwarts.


  • Raising the anti-disapparation jinx from the Great Hall so that students can practice.

  • Undoing the protective enchantments as he flies over the boundary with Harry at the end of Half-Blood Prince.


So presumably Dumbledore can create a Portkey to penetrate the Hogwarts defenses, but nobody else can.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more