Skip to main content

harry potter - How and when was the statue head Portkey to Hogwarts set up?


After the battle in the Ministry, Professor Dumbledore sends Harry to Hogwarts using a Portkey. The Portkey is a part of the statue in the "Fountain of magical brethern" in the atrium of the Ministry of Magic, and sends Harry to the Hogwarts headmaster's office. Quoting Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix chapter 36.



He [Dumbledore] walked away from the pool to the place where the golden wizard's head lay on the floor. He pointed his wand at it and the muttered, ‘Portus.’ The head glowed blue and trembled noisily against the wooden floor for a few seconds, then became still once more.


‘Now see here, Dumbledore!’ said Fudge, as Dumbledore picked up the head and walked back to Harry carrying it. ‘You haven't got authorization for that Portkey! You can't do things like that right in front of the Minister for Magic, you – you –’




Did Professor Dumbledore set up the Portkey then and there? Or was it instead a Portkey set up previously, and he merely activated it with that “Portus” incantation?


Hogwarts had magical protection set up so you can't easily enter using a Portkey. If Professor Dumbledore quickly set up the Portkey right there and then, how did he get past the protection? If the Portkey had been set up previously, did they make sure it couldn't be misused to breach the security of Hogwarts?


See also Who can make a portkey that goes into Hogwarts? and In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix it seems Dumbledore makes a portkey that only Harry can use. Am I interpreting this correctly?



Answer



When did Dumbledore set up the Portkey?


It seems that the Portus charm creates a Portkey at the point of casting. We see Dumbledore use it earlier in the same book:



Dumbledore was now rummaging in a cupboard behind Harry and Ron. He emerged from it carrying a blackened old kettle, which he placed carefully upon his desk. He raised his wand and murmured “Portus”; for a moment the kettle trembled, glowing with an odd blue light, then it quivered to a rest, as solidly black as ever.


— Order of the Phoenix, chapter 22 (St. Mungo’s Hospital for Magical Maladies and Injuries)




Unless Dumbledore was extraordinarily prescient and negligent, there’s no way that he could have foreseen the need for this Portkey. It follows that Portus is creating a Portkey.


Thus, Dumbledore must be turning the head into a Portkey at the point of casting Portus; he wasn’t activating a pre-existing Portkey.


Also note that the statue was only decapitated when Harry was fighting Bellatrix. Once Dumbledore arrives, he’s engaged with fighting Bellatrix and Voldemort. When would he have turned the head into a Portkey? He certainly wouldn’t stop mid-duel to do it.


How did he set it up?


Using the Portus charm.


(The HP Wiki has a screenshot from the Charms O.W.L. in the Order of the Phoenix movie which identifies this as a charm.)


How did Dumbledore get past the Hogwarts protections?


Dumbledore is the school headmaster, and set up many of the protections around the school. It seems logical that he can likewise undo them. As he says in the Half-Blood Prince film, “Being me has its privileges”. There are other canon examples of Dumbledore undoing the school protections:



  • Creating a Portkey for Harry and the Weasleys in Order of the Phoenix, during the incident quoted above. This has to leave Hogwarts.


  • Raising the anti-disapparation jinx from the Great Hall so that students can practice.

  • Undoing the protective enchantments as he flies over the boundary with Harry at the end of Half-Blood Prince.


So presumably Dumbledore can create a Portkey to penetrate the Hogwarts defenses, but nobody else can.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...
1 comment
Read more

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...
Post a Comment
Read more

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...
Post a Comment
Read more

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...
Post a Comment
Read more