Skip to main content

behind the scenes - Is the Xenomorph life cycle based on the life cycle of a real world species?


The Xenomorph life cycle is quite complex. It basically boils down to this1:




  • Queen Xenomorph lays eggs.




  • Eggs hatch into facehuggers.





  • Facehuggers implant eggs in a host organism's throat.




  • Implanted eggs hatch into chest-bursters.




  • Chest-bursters grow into adult Xenomorphs. Their primary function appears to be serving the queen, protecting her eggs, and gathering host organisms and trapping them in the hive, where they can be easily implanted with facehugger eggs.





Although there are some parallels to real life social insect colonies, like ants, for example, this life cycle seems somewhat unique in that there are at least two different forms of life involved in the process: Facehuggers and Xenomorphs. If queens are distinct from other xenomorphs, that makes three different forms of life.


The most striking feature of the Xenomorph life cycle (and the part I am most interested in) is the facehugger: whereas most organisms go from being eggs to being babies/larvae to being adults, xenomorphs have a totally distinct sub-species, which is clearly not a Xenomorph itself, but is absolutely vital to the propagation of the species. That is to say, Facehuggers don't grow up, they don't turn into xenomorphs, and xenomorphs don't turn into Facehuggers, but you can't get a Xenomorph without first having a facehugger.


By way of comparison, a parasitoid wasp is always a wasp. The adult lays eggs in a host organism, the eggs hatch into larvae, the larvae metamorphosize into adult wasps, and so on. But xenomorph queens lay facehugger eggs, and Facehuggers lay Xenomorph eggs. Facehuggers don't resemble xenomorphs in any way, and vice versa. Xenomorph queens can't lay Xenomorph eggs. Only Facehuggers can do that. Facehuggers can't lay facehugger eggs. Only Xenomorph queens can do that.


Did Ridley Scott model the Xenomorph life cycle after a real world species, or did he just make the whole thing up himself?




1 I know that the director's cut of the first Alien movie shows people being turned into eggs, but I decided not to mention it because it would only muddy the waters without substantially changing the thrust of the question.



Answer



TL;DR: Not entirely. The Xenomorph lifecycle appears to be a mash-up of several actual lifecycles - mostly insects & parasites, yet isn't 100% identical to any particular one.


Writer Dan O'Bannon's original lifecycle was based on a variety of different insects, and was also very similar to parasites like M. ancylivorus.




  1. Adult lays the egg on a host

  2. Egg hatches the parasitic larva, which burrows into the host

  3. Larva uses host to gestate & form cocoon

  4. Juvenile version of adult insect hatches from cocoon


This is nearly identical to O'Bannon's original Xenomorph lifecycle:



  1. Adult creates the egg

  2. Egg hatches the face-hugger, which finds a host & implants embryo


  3. Embryo uses host to gestate & grow

  4. Juvenile version of adult Xenomorph hatches from host


In fact, O'Bannon has said that parasitic insects were his primary inspiration:



When Dan O’Bannon started conceptualising his alien creature he turned to two key influences: the creatures depicted in the comic books he devoured as a child, and the insect world. “Works of fiction weren’t my only sources,” he explained in his essay Something Perfectly Disgusting. “I also patterned the Alien’s life cycle on real-life parasites … Parasitic wasps treat caterpillars in an altogether revolting manner, the study of which I commend to anyone who is tired of having good dreams.”...



and director Ridley Scott has also quoted insects as the inspiration behind the creature:



In the 1999 DVD commentary, Ridley Scott explains: “The whole notion of this [creature] was taken off a certain kind of insect that will find a host, lay its eggs, and then in that host it will bury its eggs, and then of course the eggs will grow and consume the host. So that’s the logic of it all. Probably what makes a lot of nature go around.”




Note that the extra "phase" of the Alien Queen was introduced in the sequel, with which O'Bannon had no involvement. James Cameron felt that Ripley needed an "equal" to face in the film's climax, and subsequently designed the giant Queen to fit that need. The Queen concept does, however, stick with the same insect motif.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...