Skip to main content

behind the scenes - Is the Xenomorph life cycle based on the life cycle of a real world species?


The Xenomorph life cycle is quite complex. It basically boils down to this1:




  • Queen Xenomorph lays eggs.




  • Eggs hatch into facehuggers.





  • Facehuggers implant eggs in a host organism's throat.




  • Implanted eggs hatch into chest-bursters.




  • Chest-bursters grow into adult Xenomorphs. Their primary function appears to be serving the queen, protecting her eggs, and gathering host organisms and trapping them in the hive, where they can be easily implanted with facehugger eggs.





Although there are some parallels to real life social insect colonies, like ants, for example, this life cycle seems somewhat unique in that there are at least two different forms of life involved in the process: Facehuggers and Xenomorphs. If queens are distinct from other xenomorphs, that makes three different forms of life.


The most striking feature of the Xenomorph life cycle (and the part I am most interested in) is the facehugger: whereas most organisms go from being eggs to being babies/larvae to being adults, xenomorphs have a totally distinct sub-species, which is clearly not a Xenomorph itself, but is absolutely vital to the propagation of the species. That is to say, Facehuggers don't grow up, they don't turn into xenomorphs, and xenomorphs don't turn into Facehuggers, but you can't get a Xenomorph without first having a facehugger.


By way of comparison, a parasitoid wasp is always a wasp. The adult lays eggs in a host organism, the eggs hatch into larvae, the larvae metamorphosize into adult wasps, and so on. But xenomorph queens lay facehugger eggs, and Facehuggers lay Xenomorph eggs. Facehuggers don't resemble xenomorphs in any way, and vice versa. Xenomorph queens can't lay Xenomorph eggs. Only Facehuggers can do that. Facehuggers can't lay facehugger eggs. Only Xenomorph queens can do that.


Did Ridley Scott model the Xenomorph life cycle after a real world species, or did he just make the whole thing up himself?




1 I know that the director's cut of the first Alien movie shows people being turned into eggs, but I decided not to mention it because it would only muddy the waters without substantially changing the thrust of the question.



Answer



TL;DR: Not entirely. The Xenomorph lifecycle appears to be a mash-up of several actual lifecycles - mostly insects & parasites, yet isn't 100% identical to any particular one.


Writer Dan O'Bannon's original lifecycle was based on a variety of different insects, and was also very similar to parasites like M. ancylivorus.




  1. Adult lays the egg on a host

  2. Egg hatches the parasitic larva, which burrows into the host

  3. Larva uses host to gestate & form cocoon

  4. Juvenile version of adult insect hatches from cocoon


This is nearly identical to O'Bannon's original Xenomorph lifecycle:



  1. Adult creates the egg

  2. Egg hatches the face-hugger, which finds a host & implants embryo


  3. Embryo uses host to gestate & grow

  4. Juvenile version of adult Xenomorph hatches from host


In fact, O'Bannon has said that parasitic insects were his primary inspiration:



When Dan O’Bannon started conceptualising his alien creature he turned to two key influences: the creatures depicted in the comic books he devoured as a child, and the insect world. “Works of fiction weren’t my only sources,” he explained in his essay Something Perfectly Disgusting. “I also patterned the Alien’s life cycle on real-life parasites … Parasitic wasps treat caterpillars in an altogether revolting manner, the study of which I commend to anyone who is tired of having good dreams.”...



and director Ridley Scott has also quoted insects as the inspiration behind the creature:



In the 1999 DVD commentary, Ridley Scott explains: “The whole notion of this [creature] was taken off a certain kind of insect that will find a host, lay its eggs, and then in that host it will bury its eggs, and then of course the eggs will grow and consume the host. So that’s the logic of it all. Probably what makes a lot of nature go around.”




Note that the extra "phase" of the Alien Queen was introduced in the sequel, with which O'Bannon had no involvement. James Cameron felt that Ripley needed an "equal" to face in the film's climax, and subsequently designed the giant Queen to fit that need. The Queen concept does, however, stick with the same insect motif.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...