Skip to main content

Do we know, for sure, if Godzilla is a male?


Godzilla is always referred to as male and referenced with "he" or "him."


Do we know, for sure, if Godzilla is a male? Has beast gender ever been a factor within any kaiju movies?



Answer



Short answer: No, we don't. Mostly because the Godzilla series has no decent continuity.


Long answer:

In the original Japanese versions of the movies Godzilla and other kaiju are mostly referred to by the gender-neutral it. In the English translated versions they refer to Godzilla mostly as he, hence the confusion.


So basically they (the creators/trademark owners) don't really want to put a gender on Godzilla.
He has a son, however, who hatched from an egg. This again enhances the confusion about its gender, especially since it's never cleared up where the egg came from and if Godzillas son is actually his offspring or just another member of his species.


According to my Google-Fu the 1998 Hollywood remake movie is so far the only one to put a gender on Godzilla (asexual reproduction, egg-laying and all that). However, since the creature from that movie is officially no longer recognized as Godzilla, it' doesn't count.


Toho (the company which created Godzilla and made all the movies) apparently didn't like the 1998 depiction of Godzilla very much. Saying among other things, that they took the "God" out of Godzilla. This is why they created a new monster named Zilla for the 2004 movie Godzilla: Final Wars (marking the 50th anniversary of Godzilla) as kind of a mockery of the 1998 American version.
He's one of the monsters Godzilla fights in the movie and is defeated in what is apparently one of the shortest fights in Godzilla history.


In fact, the Hollywood Godzilla from 1998 has officially been renamed Zilla by Toho (check here for sources) and in all newer depictions of the creature (which is apparently still used) it's called Zilla. Only the 1998 movie itself still calls the creature Godzilla.


All the original Godzilla movies give no indication as to its gender. In fact, there are even several origin stories, some of which would allow for the eggs (from which the baby Godzillas hatch) to be artifacts of pre-historic times, just like Godzilla itself.


It should be noted that the Shōwa series movies (from the original movie up to 1975, including Son of Godzilla) featured no real continuity at all but are rather movies based on the successful first movie.


In 1984 Toho began the so called Heisei series with The Return of Godzilla and rebooted the Godzilla universe. Starting with this movie all but the very first Godzilla movie (which is the only one tying all timelines together) never happened. Toho established a continuity between the movies which was later messed up again by introducing time travel.

Baby Godzilla was also reintroduced later in the series, but once again only as an egg that is one day just found. Nothing on what Godzilla's actual relation to the baby is and also no information on the gender.


A common factor in all the different continuities (there is also the Millennium series after 1999 up to the 2004 movie) is, that there is more than one Godzilla. The Godzilla from the original 1954 movie died at the end of the movie (killed by a device which apparently couldn't be reproduced since the plans were destroyed as well) and originally no sequels were planned.
In the second movie it was specifically stated that Godzilla is dead and that this time Japan is under attack from a second Godzilla. In one of the later movies the first Godzilla's bones are even used as the core of Mechagodzilla which then goes on to fight the current Godzilla.


There are also several plot holes in the movies themselves. For example, if there have been at least two Godzillas, why did they end up with the exact same mutation? Or why did Godzilla mutate the exact same way during the time travel plot, when he was not irradiated by a nuclear bomb but by a soviet submarine some time later.


Combined with the general lack of continuity this allows for additional speculation. If there were at least two Godzillas at one point, one of them might have been male and the other female. That Godzilla has a son seems to indicate that there are indeed two genders. So the counter question to the question of Godzilla's gender might be: Which Godzilla?


In summary: A clear answer is never given and that is most likely deliberate. Godzilla is not really supposed to have a fixed background. It changes with the movies and for the movies, reflecting the message the film makers wished to convey. Just like he became a good guy and then turned back to be more of a villain. They wanted him to have a son to make him more family friendly (this was also during a period where Godzilla became friendlier in general, turning more and more into a kind of guardian). So they gave him a son from an egg and to this day nobody bothered to explain exactly the why and how.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

fan fiction - Does the Interdict of Merlin appear in original Harry Potter canon?

In Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality by Eliezer Yudkowsky a concept called the ' Interdict of Merlin ' appears: (all emphasis added) Chapter 23: His hand on the doorknob, Harry Potter already inside and waiting, wearing his cowled cloak. "The ancient first-year spells," Harry Potter said. "What did you find?" "They're no more powerful than the spells we use now." Harry Potter's fist struck a desk, hard. "Damn it. All right. My own experiment was a failure, Draco. There's something called the Interdict of Merlin -" Draco hit himself on the forehead, realizing. "- which stops anyone from getting knowledge of powerful spells out of books, even if you find and read a powerful wizard's notes they won't make sense to you, it has to go from one living mind to another. I couldn't find any powerful spells that we had the instructions for but couldn't cast. But if you can't get them out of old books,