Skip to main content

star wars - How was Grievous able to defeat Jedi?



Since Grievous could not use the Force, wouldn't a simple Force push always eliminate the danger to a Jedi?


Note: unlike many of the other enemies of the Jedi, Grievous appears to have no weapons but his lightsabers, so he has to get up close and personal. (electrostaff is still a melee weapon).


Correction: he had a blaster as well.



Answer



Grievous


General Grievous was, among other things, an expert tactician. His grasp of strategy may not have been excellent, or it may have been hampered by the Separatist's real leadership, but he was indisputably a master tactician.


He was trained in lightsaber and electrostaff combat by some of the best in the Galaxy (notably Darth Tyranus) and his cybernetic body was capable of maneuvers that a typical humanoid couldn't do. It is also possible that his brain (which, if I recall, did have some cybernetic enhancement, and at least had some interface with his cybernetics) was divergent enough from 'standard' to mitigate the Jedi's mental tricks.


In short, he was as fast as a Jedi, he could see and process what he saw as fast as a Jedi, and he was at least as well trained as most Jedi in lightsaber combat.


The Jedi


Your typical Jedi Knight or Master during the Clone Wars era served as a General, or possibly in a support role. Jedi were too rare and valuable to serve as common troops, and there were no specialist Jedi platoons or companies. They typically served as the leadership and left the fighting to their troops. Some Jedi (notably Obi-wan and Anakin) were noted as leading from the front or taking it upon themselves to stage special operations against specific targets.



In an all-out assault, some Jedi would no doubt place themselves on the front lines - Mace Windu in particular was a Force powerhouse, capable of piling droids up like cordwood and knocking common battle droids over in windrows.


What the Clone Wars did not give Jedi much experience at is lightsaber combat. Sure, they primarily used their 'sabers against droids. That said, fighting droids with a lightsaber is primarily a matter of ranged defense. You move fast, using force-enhanced speed, block incoming bolts, close to melee range, and it's done. Even Super Battle Droids are trivial to destroy with a lightsaber - you just cut straight through. They can't block, then can't effectively strike you, and one or two blows will destroy them.


Droidekas, the shielded wheel droids, were a different matter: their shield was apparently proof against lightsabers, as evidenced by experienced combatants not charging at them. In those cases, Jedi typically had to avoid action and let the clones, often with specialized weapons, handle them.


MagnaGuard Droids


These droids, specifically designed by Grievous, were capable of going toe-to-toe with most Jedi. They might win, they might lose, but they could put up a fight. Obi-wan and Anakin both had difficulty dealing with them, and they are noted as some of the more skilled lightsaber combatants in the Order.


Conclusion


General Grievous was immune or resistant to many of the Jedi's common tricks, their equal or superior in single-blade combat, capable of moves Jedi would not easily anticipate or have trained against, and had dozens of tricks up his sleeves.


His training under Dooku would have given him an enormous edge over most Jedi - Dooku, one of the Jedi Order's most notable swordsmen, knew all their tricks and training habits. Grievous' physical attributes were at least the equal of his MagnaGuard's, and he could easily use two (or more) lightsabers.


That last sentence, above, is the final nail in most Jedi's coffins. It was extremely rare for any Jedi to use anything but a single lightsaber. Maul's double-bladed saber, the two-saber style, and other oddities were vanishingly rare. This meant that even an exceptionally skilled duelist would be at a disadvantage: they would be trained to watch two threat sources: their opponent's blade and their opponent's Force abilities. Against two blades, even skilled duelists suffered (reference: Qui-Gonn). Those who were extremely skilled, especially at defense, could handle two blades (or two attackers) somewhat well. But when four blades come into play, controlled by a single mind? Grievous could present dangers from three or four directions at once, and took advantage of this fact.


Against all of that, the ability of a Jedi to use a Force Push (itself an attack which is frequently telegraphed and which seems to be at least moderately tiring to use) to push Grievous back some distance doesn't seem like much of an advantage. Watch him when he battles, you'll see that he almost never puts himself between a Jedi and an environmental hazard (pit, spikes, chemicals or heat) that can hurt him. All a Push will do is tire the Jedi out and put some distance between the combatants.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

What is Tolkien trying to say in this letter?

In a draft of a letter, later recorded as #246, Tolkien makes a strange statement. I am interested in the first few sentences of the letter, but I will include the remainder for the sake of context. In the 'Mirror of Galadriel', 1381, it appears that Galadriel conceived of herself as capable of wielding the Ring and supplanting the Dark Lord. If so, so also were the other guardians of the Three, especially Elrond . But this is another matter. It was part of the essential deceit of the Ring to fill minds with imaginations of supreme power . But this the Great had well considered and had rejected, as is seen in Elrond's words at the Council. Galadriel's rejection of the temptation was founded upon previous thought and resolve. In any case Elrond or Galadriel would have proceeded in the policy now adopted by Sauron: they would have built up an empire with great and absolutely subservient generals and armies and engines of war, until they could challenge Sauron and destroy ...

tolkiens legendarium - Was Galadriel's temptation of Boromir instrumental to his fall?

We know Galadriel tempted the members of the Fellowship, did she tempt Boromir with visions of taking the Ring and saving Gondor? In the books, Boromir willingly accepts the judgement of the council that the Ring should be destroyed, but after the meeting with Celeborn and Galadriel his personality seems to change. Was the temptation offered by Galadriel in some way responsible for Boromir's fall? Answer It's likely, but not certain I believe it is likely Galadriel tempted him with the ring, and in doing so re-ignited a pre-existing idea to take the ring, but to be clear lets break this down into three parts. Boromir at the Council of Elrond Boromir after setting off Boromir after being tempted Boromir at the Council of Elrond Boromir pleas for the ring to go to Minas Tirith, to help Gondor in its defense against Mordor. “ Why should we not think that the Great Ring has come into our hands to serve us in the very hour of need? Wielding it the Free Lords of the Free may surely...

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...