Skip to main content

star wars - How was Grievous able to defeat Jedi?



Since Grievous could not use the Force, wouldn't a simple Force push always eliminate the danger to a Jedi?


Note: unlike many of the other enemies of the Jedi, Grievous appears to have no weapons but his lightsabers, so he has to get up close and personal. (electrostaff is still a melee weapon).


Correction: he had a blaster as well.



Answer



Grievous


General Grievous was, among other things, an expert tactician. His grasp of strategy may not have been excellent, or it may have been hampered by the Separatist's real leadership, but he was indisputably a master tactician.


He was trained in lightsaber and electrostaff combat by some of the best in the Galaxy (notably Darth Tyranus) and his cybernetic body was capable of maneuvers that a typical humanoid couldn't do. It is also possible that his brain (which, if I recall, did have some cybernetic enhancement, and at least had some interface with his cybernetics) was divergent enough from 'standard' to mitigate the Jedi's mental tricks.


In short, he was as fast as a Jedi, he could see and process what he saw as fast as a Jedi, and he was at least as well trained as most Jedi in lightsaber combat.


The Jedi


Your typical Jedi Knight or Master during the Clone Wars era served as a General, or possibly in a support role. Jedi were too rare and valuable to serve as common troops, and there were no specialist Jedi platoons or companies. They typically served as the leadership and left the fighting to their troops. Some Jedi (notably Obi-wan and Anakin) were noted as leading from the front or taking it upon themselves to stage special operations against specific targets.



In an all-out assault, some Jedi would no doubt place themselves on the front lines - Mace Windu in particular was a Force powerhouse, capable of piling droids up like cordwood and knocking common battle droids over in windrows.


What the Clone Wars did not give Jedi much experience at is lightsaber combat. Sure, they primarily used their 'sabers against droids. That said, fighting droids with a lightsaber is primarily a matter of ranged defense. You move fast, using force-enhanced speed, block incoming bolts, close to melee range, and it's done. Even Super Battle Droids are trivial to destroy with a lightsaber - you just cut straight through. They can't block, then can't effectively strike you, and one or two blows will destroy them.


Droidekas, the shielded wheel droids, were a different matter: their shield was apparently proof against lightsabers, as evidenced by experienced combatants not charging at them. In those cases, Jedi typically had to avoid action and let the clones, often with specialized weapons, handle them.


MagnaGuard Droids


These droids, specifically designed by Grievous, were capable of going toe-to-toe with most Jedi. They might win, they might lose, but they could put up a fight. Obi-wan and Anakin both had difficulty dealing with them, and they are noted as some of the more skilled lightsaber combatants in the Order.


Conclusion


General Grievous was immune or resistant to many of the Jedi's common tricks, their equal or superior in single-blade combat, capable of moves Jedi would not easily anticipate or have trained against, and had dozens of tricks up his sleeves.


His training under Dooku would have given him an enormous edge over most Jedi - Dooku, one of the Jedi Order's most notable swordsmen, knew all their tricks and training habits. Grievous' physical attributes were at least the equal of his MagnaGuard's, and he could easily use two (or more) lightsabers.


That last sentence, above, is the final nail in most Jedi's coffins. It was extremely rare for any Jedi to use anything but a single lightsaber. Maul's double-bladed saber, the two-saber style, and other oddities were vanishingly rare. This meant that even an exceptionally skilled duelist would be at a disadvantage: they would be trained to watch two threat sources: their opponent's blade and their opponent's Force abilities. Against two blades, even skilled duelists suffered (reference: Qui-Gonn). Those who were extremely skilled, especially at defense, could handle two blades (or two attackers) somewhat well. But when four blades come into play, controlled by a single mind? Grievous could present dangers from three or four directions at once, and took advantage of this fact.


Against all of that, the ability of a Jedi to use a Force Push (itself an attack which is frequently telegraphed and which seems to be at least moderately tiring to use) to push Grievous back some distance doesn't seem like much of an advantage. Watch him when he battles, you'll see that he almost never puts himself between a Jedi and an environmental hazard (pit, spikes, chemicals or heat) that can hurt him. All a Push will do is tire the Jedi out and put some distance between the combatants.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed....

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...