Skip to main content

The ending of the Witcher saga


The ending of the Witcher series by A. Sapkowski is a source of a lot of controversy. I was wondering if I can find some clarification here.


Opinions of what actually happens after the fighting in Rivia range from (a) everybody lives happily ever after, in particular Geralt and Yennefer both live and get married to (b) both Geralt and Yennefer simply die. There are of course a number of intermediate options (which I personally find more plausible), where they end up somewhere, and it is again a matter of discussion where that is and how "real" this place is. Possibilities I have heard mentioned in this context include: Arthurian Britain, Avalon, some unidentified plane, heaven.



Is there a "canon" interpretation of how the story ends? If not, can the possibilities at least be narrowed down? In particular, can it be said if Geralt and Yennefer are alive in a meaningful way?



Answer



Now first of all, I'll concentrate solely on book canon here, since you're asking about the ending of the actual novel series. In the games Geralt is very much still alive, however you construe that out of the book ending. In lack of an official English translation, let alone one I have at hand, the excerpts quoted here have been translated into English by me (as accurately as my abilities allowed me) from Erik Simon's official German translation of Lady of the Lake.




One thing you might want to consider is Ciri's vision. At the moment when Geralt is hit by the pitchfork, he remembers the time back in Kaer Morhen with young Ciri, when she repeatedly had strange visions and dreams, including about Geralt's death:



    "Tell me again what she said", Vesemir commanded and emptied his cup in one gulp. "Word for word."
    "Word for word doesn't work", Geralt said, his view directed into the blaze. "But the meaning, if there is meaning in looking for a meaning in there, was this: Me and Coën will die. Teeth will be our demise. Teeth will kill us both. Him two. Me three."



And if we remember, Coën indeed died at the battle of Brenna. When he is brought into Milo "Rusty" Vanderbeck's field hospital the following conversation occurs:




"Strange." Rusty tried to wipe his face with his elbow, but even that was full of blood. Iola came to his assistence.
    "Interesting", the surgeon repeated and pointed at the patient. "Stung with a fork or some kind of partisan with two tips ... One prong of the weapon pierced the heart, there, please look. The chamber is doubtlessly penetrated, the aorta nealy severed ... And he breathed just one moment ago. Here on the table. Hit right in the heart he made it to this table ..."
    "Do you want to say", the trooper from the Voluntary Light Cavalry asked gloomily, "that he is dead? That we carried him out of the battle in vain?"
    "It is never in vain." Rusty did not lower his gaze. "But to say the truth, yes, he does not live anymore, sadly. Exitus. Bring him ... Hey, damn ... Take a look at this, girls."
    Marti Sodergren, Shani and Iola bent over the corpse. Rusty pulled the eyelid of the dead man back. "Have you ever seen something like this?"
    All three shrugged.
    "Yes", all said in unison. They looked at each other, as if being a little astonished.
    "Me too", Rusty said. "This is a witcher. A mutant. This would explain why he lived so long ... This was your combatant, you people? Or did you bring him by coincidence?"
    "This was our companion, sir doctor", the second voluntary, a beanpole with bandaged head, confirmed grumpily. "From our squadron, a voluntary like we. Alas, he could handle a sword! His name was Coën."




So Coën did indeed die (and Rusty's competent medical opinion leaves no doubt in this) from some kind of two-pronged fork, like the vision prophecied. And Geralt is just about to be stabbed by a three-pronged pitchfork, too. This might already be a very strong hint that Geralt is indeed about to die right now.


And in fact Yennefer has a similar flashback (albeit not directly when she supposedly dies by trying to heal Geralt, but a little ealier before she helps Triss summon the hail) to an earlier experience of hers, when she unsuccessfully tried to kill herself and woke up in bed at the care of Tissaia de Vries, who also spoke about Yennefer's actual future death:



    "You will live." The voice of Tissai was factual, serious, even strict. "Your time has not come yet. When it comes, you will think of this day."



What she indeed does right now.


Now it is true that those might just be red herrings to make us think the end is nigh when it actually isn't (and in fact this wasn't the exact point of Yennefer's supposed death yet). But seeing how both of them have flashbacks to some kind of death prophecies, one very clear and accurate and one a bit more fuzzy, it is a strong motif that adds to the bigger picture.


Then we have to consider the mythical nature of their waking up on some strange unknown meadow supposedly being together forever. Neither do I think this is just one of the many parallel worlds that Ciri can just switch through at will and where she dumped them to be happy for now and to visit them whenever she pleases, it is somewhere else, it is something else. This is evident from her tearing eye when she recounts how Geralt and Yennefer marry later, with all the other living and dead characters joining the party, an obvious sugar coat ending:




    "So what was then?"
    "Well, what", she snorted. "They married."
    "Tell."
    "Ah, what's to tell there? There was a happy feast. Everyone came together, Dandelion mother Nenneke, Iola and Eurneid, Yarpen Zigrin, Vesemir, Eskel ... Coën, Milva, Angoulême ... and my Mistle ... I was there myself, ate and drank. And they, to say Geralt and Yennefer, later had their own house and were happy, very, very happy. Like in the fairy tales. You understand?"
    "Why are you crying, Lady of the Lake?"
    "I'm not crying at all. My eyes tear from the wind. And that's it!"



So I don't think Ciri could ever reach them again, nor bring them back anywhere else.


From all those aspects and the general tone they set added together I would draw the conclusion that they are indeed dead, or at least not "alive in a meaningful way".


Wherever strange mythical paradise they are, be it heaven, be it Avalon, or whatever you want to call it, in their very universe and in their very reality they are for all intents and purposes dead, realistically speaking.



But I won't deny the fact that the ending is indeed a little ambiguous and open to interpretation. This is merely my conclusion based on how the story was presented.




As an addendum, the rather new standalone novel Season of Storms from 2013 does reference Geralt's possible fate and survival in its epilogue.



Where he saves the young Nimue from a monster on her way to Aretusa, 105 years after his supposed death.



However, that whole epilogue is pretty much as mysteriously ambiguous and open to interpretation as the ending of the novel series. It does not make a clear statement about Geralt's actual survival or what happened to him at all either, or if the described encounter even happened in reality. If anything it rather supports the mythical themes of afterlife invoked in Lady of the Lake.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.