Skip to main content

harry potter - Is Hagrid mentally unstable?


A user in an answer to this question suggested that Hagrid is mentally unstable.


Is there canonical evidence that directly states if Hagrid is mentally unstable or not?


Failing that, here's a follow-up:


Does Hagrid's behavior throughout all canonical materials indicate a mental illness, as per the DSM-V?


P.S. Word-of-God is acceptable.




Answer



It rather depends on your definitions. Although he was involved in some dangerous activities with his pupils the ultimate responsibility for the safety of lessons has to rest with the headmaster, similarly he didn't decide on the Forbidden Forest detention, he just carried it out and went to some lengths to make it as safe as possible in the circumstances.


For sure he does have a bit of a 'blind spot', as the book put it, for assessing the potential danger posed by magical creatures, but it's not as if Hogwarts is that safe a place anyway. Quidditch is plainly potentially lethal. Indeed his lessons have a pretty good safety record compared to Hogwarts in general. Equally, you can't really call this 'unstable' as his skewed judgement is, if nothing else, consistent.


Equally, there is no indication that Hagrid doesn't care if his students are hurt and he seems perfectly able to form reasonable social relationships with his colleagues and pupils. Consider that when Draco was mauled by Buckbeak (through his own arrogance) his first reaction was to take him to the hospital wing.


He also shows a lot of empathy for other people and animals, which is actually pretty impressive when you consider how he has been treated for most of his life.


He was also able to bounce back pretty well from being wrongly imprisoned in Azkaban and that in itself suggests that he is reasonably mentally resilient.


It is also reasonable to say that a certain amount of fearlessness is pretty much essential for his job and indeed the whole order of the Phoenix.


Indeed the worst act of unthinking recklessness in the whole book is Dumbledore putting on a cursed ring, is he mentally ill ?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...