Skip to main content

harry potter - Why is Snape the only Death Eater who can produce a Patronus?



In all the books, Snape is the only Death Eater who can produce a Patronus charm. Why can't any other Death Eaters produce a Patronus? Considering that they all went to Hogwarts, and would have learnt to produce it in NEWT classes, it seems surprising that Snape remains the only Death Eater to produce one until the seventh book.




Answer



JKR explained in a web chat that Death Eaters couldn't produce Patronuses because they didn't need them.



Samantha: Was snape the only death eater who could produce a full patronus


J.K. Rowling: Yes, because a Patronus is used against things that the Death Eaters generally generate, or fight alongside. They would not need Patronuses.



Essentially, they're allied with the Dementors so they don't need a way to defend themselves from the effect they have on them, apparently. It's possible (though this is entirely speculation) that even if they were to attempt to learn, the experiences that led to them wanting to become Death Eaters might mean they don't have a sufficiently happy memory to make the spell work. Snape's extraordinary love for Lily is the exception; it seems like it's probably the only (very) bright spot in an otherwise miserable life.


All of that said, I'm not sure they would have ever been taught. Patronuses may not be part of the syllabus at Hogwarts, even at NEWT level. Harry learnt how to conjure a Patronus in his third year, and he taught a number of other students during sessions with Dumbledore's Army in his fifth year, but there's never a point where they actually learn the spell during a regular lesson.


They cover the theory of it and what it's used for, but there's never any practical sessions on casting the spell. There's also repeated mention of how extremely difficult it is to produce a corporeal Patronus, how impressive it is that Harry's able to conjure one, and how many (most?) qualified witches and wizards aren't capable of doing so. Seems counter productive to attempt to teach a spell that a large percentage of the students may never be able to perform adequately.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF
Post a Comment
Read more

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...
Post a Comment
Read more