Skip to main content

game of thrones - Why do members of the Night's Watch need to vow to "father no children"?


From their vows:



Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death. I shall take no wife, hold no lands, father no children. I shall wear no crowns and win no glory. I shall live and die at my post. I am the sword in the darkness. I am the watcher on the walls. I am the fire that burns against the cold, the light that brings the dawn, the horn that wakes the sleepers, the shield that guards the realms of men. I pledge my life and honor to the Night's Watch, for this night and all nights to come.



Why do they need to vow that? Why celibacy is important for the order?



Answer



I believe the vows of the Night's Watch go back through the ages, in the order of thousands of years, back to mythical heroes like Brandon the Builder and before him. GRRM has allowed his characters somewhat free interpretation of what these vows mean.


Sam (and Bran's group) was made aware of the old gate, under the Nightfort, which tied the vow to the gate's magical quality. I believe there are more such ancient magical qualities tied to the vow. There seems to be some purpose to Jon and Sam saying their vows before a heart tree, for example.



Many black brothers seem to believe that protecting the realm from wildlings is the core of the oath, whereas we have seen that Stannis and Jon have made the interpretation that their duty is to protect the realms of men, in which wildlings are considered on the side of the realm. I believe this comes close to the original intent of the vow. As Lord Commander Mormont said (paraphrasing):



"You don't build a wall hundreds of feet high to keep out raiders."



In the time when the oath was conceived, I believe the intent was to form an elite guard force, whose sole task was to guard against the ancient evil, the Long Night, The Great Other. As is mentioned in many of Jon's chapters, I cannot remember if it was Maester Aemon or Lord Commander Mormont, family ties are strong, and the ones who test a man's oath the hardest.


While other men might be part of the realm; Lords, servants, knights, fathers, etc, the Night's Watch stands outside it. They have severed all ties to it. Their sole focus is the danger north of the wall. It is in their name: The Night's Watch, they who watch against the Long Night.



Night gathers, and now my watch begins.



They are watchmen. Not primarily soldiers, or an army.




It shall not end until my death.



Making this pledge binds you forever, so that you shall never have any cause to think of your past or your future.



I shall take no wife, hold no lands, father no children. I shall wear no crowns and win no glory.



This is the meat of the pledge: To forever forsake your claim to your place in the realm.



I shall live and die at my post. I am the sword in the darkness. I am the watcher on the walls. I am the fire that burns against the cold, the light that brings the dawn, the horn that wakes the sleepers, the shield that guards the realms of men. I pledge my life and honor to the Night's Watch, for this night and all nights to come.




This last part to me has always revolved around "the watcher on the walls", "I shall live and die at my post" and "the horn that wakes the sleepers," -- which also ties into the very dramatic 1-2-3 blasts of their horn signals: Once for rangers returning, twice for wildlings, three times for Others.


While other people, such as for example the Lord of Winterfell and his men, may take up arms against the enemies of the realm, they are not pledged to guard against the Long Night, their attention may be divided. They might enjoy coming home a cold evening, sitting in front of their fire with their children and turning a blind eye to the dark and cold night outside.


But someone has to be the one to keep watch, to wake the sleepers, to bear witness to strange events, to listen to the forest and sense the creeping cold. Someone who spends his life in the cold and empty forests and learns how to read its signs.


Much like in the prologue to AGOT, Gared and Will could sense something was wrong, but Ser Waymar Royce could not.


I guess in short it boils down to no division of loyalty and no distractions. Much like any knight can protect the king in his own right, and has his own place in the protection around the king, a knight of the Kingsguard has the duty of being the first and innermost line of defense. His watchfulness can never waver for a second, as Ser Barristan notes in ADWD:



But the battle was never truly done for a knight of the Kingsguard. Threats came from everywhere and nowhere, at any time of day or night. [....] For every hour of fighting, a Kingsguard knight spent ten thousand hours watching, waiting, standing silent in the shadows. King Hizdahr's pit fighters were already growing bored and restive with their new duties, and bored men were lax, slow to react.



I think Lord Commander Mormont demonstrated it the best. On their ranging, he comes to the conclusion that something very bad is happening, that the wall and the Night's Watch's purpose is not what they thought. He was able to make that deduction because his only focus in life is being the watcher on the walls. That guard who has spent thousands of hours watching and recognizes the danger in time.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...