Skip to main content

dc - Why not just imprison Vandal Savage?


In the end of the Legends of Tomorrow episode Blood Ties, Rip Hunter manages to



kill this Vandal Savage fellow by stabbing him in the neck. After that, the group laments that Vandal is sure to reincarnate, because he can only be killed by stabbing him with a very particular knife held by a particular person.



The ship AI suggests checking out the year 1986 as the time Vandal has become active again, and the episode ends.


Now, in episode one, Hunter has some sort of flashing kidnapping-gun that he uses to bring together the group of people he wishes to work with. And Vandal has been




incapacitated anyway by the aforementioned stabby-stabby, and the henchmen seem scattered, so Hunter&co seem pretty much free to do whatever they want with him. But they just leave.



So anyhow: why is it not considered a viable solution to cement Vandal's body in a block of iron reinforced concrete or other resilient material - and drop the thing down the Mariana Trench or somewhere in outer space (the ship apparently being capable of travelling to any time and place) or eject it in the time limbo thingy? Even if he is ever recovered, which is unlikely, but if he would be, then by that time he would surely have lost his mind and not be of any harm.


Nobody in the show even considers any sort of imprisonment as a solution - so there must be some reason behind it (or, of course, possibly it's just a supermassive plothole). Answers based on any source material are ok. Having never read a single DC comic book, I'm just curious as to the logic of this show.



Well, come to think of it, they could also have picked up Vandal's lifeless body and brought it to the Hawk lady so she could stab him whenever she wakes up... no?




Answer



In the comics, Vandal Savage needs sustenance to retain his immortality



He drinks food, alcohol, and the blood of his enemies


In the comics, Vandal Savage regularly eats and drinks food. In fact, he's noted for drinking alcohol and getting drunk in order to dull the pain of an internal cancer that won't kill him because of his healing factor. While it's not clear if food and drink sustains him, Savage regularly drinks the blood of his enemies in order to sustain his powers.


He nearly died after being trapped on an asteroid for a year


You specifically mentioned dropping him off somewhere in outer space. The heroes tried that in the comics. In JSA Classified (part of One Year Later), he had been trapped on an asteroid for a year and after he got off, Savage found that his immortality was completely drained and he had only 11 days to live. The only way he could regain his immortality was by eating a clone of himself in order to regain his powers.


Assuming the Arrowverse works the same way, he can die if not sustained, which would mean he would reincarnate


The heroes are clearly concerned about Vandal Savage reincarnating, and I'm going to assume that this works the same was as it does for Hawk Man and Hawk Girl, since they gained their powers at the same time. So this would mean that he is reborn to new parents and grows up. Since there is no way to stop this or predict where he will be reincarnated, that's a problem. The question then is: can he be prevented from dying?


The version of Vandal Savage in the Arrowverse doesn't seem to get powers from drinking blood (just by killing Hawkman and Hawkgirl), and we haven't seen him eat or drink yet. Until the show provides us with more information, the two most likely reasons that would explain not imprisoning Vandal Savage are:



  • If he requires regular food and/or air, he may be able to starve to death and/or suffocate despite being immortal (i.e. his immortality only protects him from aging and violent harm), in which case he would reincarnate.

  • His immortality may fade after a time, requiring him to regularly hunt down Hawkman and Hawkgirl. If it completely fades, then he would be vulnerable and die, thus causing him to reincarnate.



Also, we don't know if Savage is capable of killing himself intentionally. Obviously if he needs sustenance, he can starve himself, but if he can kill himself by some other means (self-mutilation, poison, etc), then he's back to reincarnating. If this is possible, creating a prison that is guaranteed for all time to prevent him from suicide is nigh impossible. And there is no known way to prevent reincarnation, aside from killing him properly.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...