Skip to main content

time travel - Is the Doctor's inability to backtrack along his own timeline consistent?


In the new Doctor Who series, we are frequently reminded that the Doctor "becomes a part of the events" as soon as he enters a time period, and is unable to (or should not) backtrack to fix his mistakes along that series of events.


Doctor Intervention


The question is (please refer to the diagram):



While he cannot travel back along a series of events of which he is a part (i.e. within the blue rectangle), what prevents him from traveling further into the past beyond those events and leaving a message for himself, or better yet, geting a proxy to help him out? Isn't this what he did in Blink? Why didn't the reapers appear then? How do we know when it's just "wibbly wobbly timey wimey" stuff and when it's time for the reapers?


Edit/Clarification: In Blink, a future Doctor stuck in the past forwards information to the present to get someone to alter his timeline. No more than one copy of the Doctor was present at any given point of the timeline, but the net effect was the same -- alteration. Why was this allowed?



Answer



From my understanding the timeline is generally pretty robust, able to change to all of the things the Doctor and others do to it. However, in Father's Day they establish that having multiple copies at one location, especially interacting with one another, is enough to "weaken" the timeline and cause serious problems (like spontaneous paradactyl attacks). If he and Rose simply observed the other copy watching instead of interfering their would have been no problem. In fact on several occasions the Doctor refers to times where he has witnessed the same event multiple times.


I don't think its the copies that cause the problem (although they raise the risk greatly) its the interaction of multiple copies (perhaps even through messages) that can cause a problem.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed....
Post a Comment
Read more

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...
Post a Comment
Read more