Skip to main content

stargate - What are the main thematic differences between SG-1, Atlantis, and Universe?


The Stargate franchise spans three main series, an RPG, an animated series (which I understand to be non-canon), and more.


My wife and I watched and loved SG-1, but I'm having a hard time convincing her to watch SG-Atlantis and SG-Universe. She's been burned by spin-offs in the past, and thinks that the quality is never as good as the original, and feels that the feel of the series won't be similar. She also enjoyed SG-1 largely because she likes the characters and the dynamic that evolved over 10 seasons.


I don't have much exposure to SG-Atlantis (watched some of the first season on TV, as I could) and none at all to SG-Universe, so I can't honestly tell her that the stories are as engaging, the characters as entertaining, etc.


Aside from the obvious differences in cast, setting, and antagonist, are there any significant differences in characterization, story telling, tone, or 'feel' between SG-1 and SG-Atlantis, or SG-1 and SG-Universe?




Answer



Without delving into an in-depth analysis of Atlantis and Universe, I'll try and be as succinct as possible.


There are definitely noticeable differences between the shows. Atlantis, being the first spin-off, has much the same feel as SG1, as it began alongside season 8 and ran in parallel, with many crossover episodes where characters from SG1 would visit Atlantis, and vice versa.


As SG1 came to an end, Atlantis kind of developed into its own show and, in my opinion, improved upon the more lighthearted tone set by the later seasons of SG1 (season 10 in particular). But still, it remained much closer to the SG1 concept as opposed to the latest development: Universe.


SG:U is less like SG1, and more like a combination of other sci-fi shows. For this reason, many people have criticised it. Imagine a cross between Star Trek: Voyager and Battlestar Galactica. Personally, I think it's great, as those are two of my most favourite sci-fi shows. Universe has a much more "gritty" feel, using similar camera techniques as Battlestar Galactica (unstable/erratic camera shots in space, etc). In my mind the Voyager influence comes from the fact that they're stranded on a ship flying through space unable to get home. To be honest, the only thing linking SG:U to the original shows is the fact that they have a Stargate, on an Ancient ship, with occasional contact back to earth with some familiar SG1 characters. The majority of the show feels like a completely new concept. The acting of most characters is average, with the exception of Robert Carlyle, who is, in my opinion, excellent.


If you loved SG1, you'll definitely enjoy Atlantis. However, I wouldn't recommend SG:U to just anyone. It's nothing like SG1, and it shouldn't be expected to be. You really need to decide for yourself by watching a few episodes. It's very slow moving in terms of action, and focuses more on character and scene development.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more