Skip to main content

How are the various Links, Zeldas and Ganondorfs related and connected?



In the Legend of Zelda games we have a constant set of characters, that act and perform very similarly from game to game, yet with a few differences.


How are these characters (Link, Zelda and Ganondorf) connected through the series?


I found this on Wikipedia:



The protagonist in each game is usually not the same incarnation of Link, but a few exceptions do exist.




And various discussions, but I'm after an answer from canon as far as that is possible.



Answer



The short answer is: Ganon/Ganondorf is always an incarnation of "Ganon" so whether that counts as him being the same person or not, is up to your personal definition. Link however, is rarely the same person, and is always given the name Link for consistency. He is generally a different "chosen one" style boy hero, with no claim to fame at the time of the adventure's onset. There are some exceptions.


The Long Answer is: To understand the various Links and Ganondorfs/Ganons you first have to understand the timeline: Official Timeline
According to the official timeline, the various Links are separated by often hundreds of years, and are often the same age at the time of choosing. This very simply shows that the Links and Ganon's are not the same physical people.


Now, while that may seem unrelated... the fact is that in Ganon's case, he is "sort of" the same guy all the time. By sort-of, I mean he is not the same physical body, but always some kind of reincarnation of Ganon. Where this gets foggy is that the leader of the Gerudo is always said to be this reincarnation of Ganon. So, he is kinda the same guy, but through various rebirths/awakenings.


Link, however, is sometimes the same hero, sometimes not. The Link of OOT and Majora's Mask are the same link. But, the Link for Zelda 1 and Link to the Past are different. It is actually rare for Link to be the same person.


In Wind Waker it is mentioned that "Link" the boy hero, is always chosen during a time of peril within an era.


Having said, that, games that take place during the same era can sometimes use the same Link. Note that most of the games start out with Link having no Hero status, often having no sword at all. This is not the case in Majora's Mask, as Link IS a hero at the time, but is stripped of all his equipment and transformed into a Deku before the adventure begins.


It's irrelevant who the Link of Link's awakening is, the events within it don't actually happen.



The Resurrection Theory


It has been made fairly clear that the spirit of Ganon has been resurrected throughout the various timelines as recurring spirit of hatred, he often has very different backgrounds. The one common bar is that Ganondorf / Ganon is of the same spirit.


The less clear item is that Zelda and Link may also be reincarnations of one another. This is hinted at, but never clearly defined. The goddess chooses a hero for the ages and often imbues him with the Master Sword (which is said to always be the same Master Sword, btw). Regardless, there is a continual cycle of Ganon's hatred casting his anger over the land, and a Hero of Time taking up the will of the goddess to strike him down.


The example furthest up the canon is of course Skyward Sword. Watching the ending sequence will explain the whole cyclic Ganon/Link/Zelda thing.... but is a huge spoiler.


Different Links


Zelda I and Zelda II (same Link, different Zelda)
Zelda, Link to the Past (possibly same Zelda as Zelda II, but different Link)
Oracle of Seasons, Oracle of Ages, Link's Awakening (same Link in all 3)
Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask (only one has Ganondorf or Zelda, same Link)
Wind Waker and Phantom Hourglass

Twilight Princess (This is an alternate timeline from WW and PH. So, I consider it to be a different Link as no one Link experiences WW, PH, and TP events.)
Skyward Sword (the earliest piece of the timeline, the Zelda in this one is said to be the original Zelda, predating the Zelda of Zelda II and Link to the Past).
Minnish Cap (this is a strange part of the timeline, but it's clear you're no hero at the onset of this one.)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...