Skip to main content

harry potter - How did the Deluminator help Ron find his way back?


We're introduced to the Deluminator several times throughout the books, however it is always presented as a magical device which can remove and replace the light in a room or area. How does that match up to the way in which it suddenly was able to lead Ron back to Harry and Hermione? I can't see how the two functions are related. Is this just a new feature of the Deluminator that was never foreshadowed in any way?



Answer



I don't believe there was any specific foretelling, but there was a running 'light in the dark' metaphor J.K. Rowling built throughout the series, and I think the Deluminator became the physical manifestation of that metaphor. I do not, however, think there has ever been any direct or predictable link between the metaphor and the Deluminator itself. It's entirely possible it grew into this purpose over the course of the series since we do see a name change for the device; 'Put-outer' becoming 'Deluminator'


The quote Izkata identified from the Prisoner of Azkaban movie is most likely a re-coloring of that scene with J.K's involvement in the screenplay. Though the movie was released ~3 years before the completion of Deathly Hallows book, where we see the previously undiscovered use, it could easily have been the intent of the author to use the movie as a vehicle to further deepen the metaphor in anticipation of its further use within the plot.


Potential references that may fill in backstory (more than foretelling) around the Deluminator and metaphor.



  1. During the bestowing from Dumbledore's will, Scrimgeour calls it a valuable, unique item, certainly of Dumbledore's own design. Implying speculated purpose beyond the simple cantrip of common use.


  2. After Ron leaves, and before his return, Harry and Hermione discovery Kendra/Ariana's grave in Godric's Hollow where the following quote, presumably by Dumbledore, appears: "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also."


None of this foreshadows the additional power, but together it can build up to describe it decently. In sad, dark times the Deluminator, a lighter, can illuminate your path and show the way (back) to your heart.


Dumbledore's dark and sad history could certainly have led him to build the Deluminator in such a way as to also guide himself (and others) back to a path out of darkness.



It's all a bit of inference and speculation, but such is the way of metaphors some times.


If you want a bigger stretch ... "Deluminator" could also be read as "De luminator" or "The Luminator" which could have been the author's attempt at tongue-in-cheek foreshadowing within the name change. Implying not just a means by which to extinguish a light, but also shed it.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more