Skip to main content

alien franchise - How did they clone Ripley?


Okay, so this is how I understood it: They found some drops of blood that Ripley lost during the third film (Alien3). So, they clone her. Easy peasy, far future, get it.



Now, that newly cloned human winds up with a clone of the parasite that infested the original human. From a drop of blood.


In addition: The parasite would age at the same speed as the host. They didn't wait a lifetime for Ripley to mature. I would guess it took only a couple years, given that the scientists didn't appear to have aged noticeably. Anyway, Aliens hatch rather quickly. It doesn't take them decades, it doesn't take them years, it doesn't take them days.


How does this make any sense?



Answer



Bad science abounds in this release of Alien: Resurrection. I will summarize what is supposed to have happened.




  • Ripley's blood is found. Her blood was compromised by the Xenomorph genes. I have discussed the idea of the Xenomorph utilizing the genetic structure of its prey, but this particular event implies the alien compromises ALL of the genetic structures of its target during its short time within its target organism.





  • When the gene sample is analyzed, the scientists were surprised to discover that her blood was not a single genetic structure but was instead hybridized by a queen.




  • This meant the scientists, if they were able to create a viable sample would have the potential to create and breed the aliens; and there was much rejoicing.




Here is where the movie becomes convoluted and loses almost everyone:




  • There are multiple attempts used to try and create a viable sample from which to recreate the queen. Two development paths are used during the study.





  • One path recreates Ripley's body after eight or more attempts. We only got to see the ones that were remotely close to viable. There could have been many others. You get to see those attempts when Ripley flames that lab near the end of the movie. All of those different creatures were an attempt to recreate the Ripley line of the creature's development. Once a viable Ripley is created, she gives birth to an alien queen. You do not see this. It is implied. Ripley calls herself the creatures' mother.




Clone lab where Ripley clones failures are stored.


Clone lab where Ripley clones failures are stored.



  • The Ripley path recreates Ripley, nearly complete with memory, attitude, and superhuman levels of strength, agility and senses. She reaches adulthood at a super-fast rate, much like the aliens do. She then appears to stop aging, otherwise she would have aged unto death by the end of the movie. The Ripley clone is the only viable version along the Ripley path of development.



Beautiful Ripley clone


Beautiful Ripley clone




  • On the Alien path, there is also one hybrid success, a queen who will need hosts to produce her normal offspring. Three offspring are the result which are stupidly put into the same cell. Two of them kill the third and escape through the acid-made hole in the floor.




  • Unfortunately, the queen has hybridized genes as well, and one of her offspring has a far more human appearance and is not born from an egg but a live birth. Don't think too deeply into this. You've already watched it. You can't un-see it.





Alien-Human hybrid, the ugly one...


Alien-Human hybrid, the ugly one...



  • The alien-human hybrid kills its mother moments after its birth as well as the annoying scientist who narrates its birth until it kills him.


If you want to follow this catastrophe in a discussion of its scientific merits on posthumanism, read this essay: 'Who Are You?': Alien/Woman as Posthuman Subject in Alien Resurrection


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

What is Tolkien trying to say in this letter?

In a draft of a letter, later recorded as #246, Tolkien makes a strange statement. I am interested in the first few sentences of the letter, but I will include the remainder for the sake of context. In the 'Mirror of Galadriel', 1381, it appears that Galadriel conceived of herself as capable of wielding the Ring and supplanting the Dark Lord. If so, so also were the other guardians of the Three, especially Elrond . But this is another matter. It was part of the essential deceit of the Ring to fill minds with imaginations of supreme power . But this the Great had well considered and had rejected, as is seen in Elrond's words at the Council. Galadriel's rejection of the temptation was founded upon previous thought and resolve. In any case Elrond or Galadriel would have proceeded in the policy now adopted by Sauron: they would have built up an empire with great and absolutely subservient generals and armies and engines of war, until they could challenge Sauron and destroy ...

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...

harry potter - How could Expelliarmus beat Avada Kedavra?

I want to be very careful about how I ask this question – I am not asking How did Voldemort die? [CLOSED] Below the text is the relevant passages from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows if anyone wants to review them (I'm sorry for the amount of text). How did Expelliarmus beat Avada Kedavra and kill Voldemort? I feel the reason Harry's Expelliarmus overpowered Voldemort's Avada Kedavra curse has to do with who was master of the Elder Wand and how the Elder Wand works. I've always had trouble understanding fully how the Elder Wand works, though. How much did the fact that Voldemort never truly won or mastered the Elder Wand factor into how Expelliarmus reacted to Avada Kedavra and caused Avada Kedavra to rebound and kill Voldemort? An answer based in book canon would be especially welcome, but any canon source really is fine. Harry heard the high voice shriek as he, too, yelled his best hope to the heavens, pointing Draco’s wand: ‘ Avada Kedavra !’ ‘ Expelliarmus !...