Skip to main content

movie - Why was the tender still attached?


Apart from the opportunity for Clara Clayton to have an exciting traversal of the distance between the back of the fuel tender and the engine (Golly!) in Back to the Future III: Was there any reason to leave the tender attached to the engine?



  1. Fully loaded, it would probably weigh half as much as the engine itself. The less mass a surface vehicle is hauling, the quicker it can accelerate.

  2. For fuel they were mostly relying on the color coded burn sticks the Doc used in his furnace. Even if they'd needed extra fuel beyond that, they could've stocked the furnace & detached the tender when they stopped for the car. It was not far from there to the point of '88 or bust'.



I don't think I've ever seen a steam engine traveling with no tender. So it might be that a steam train and its tender are effectively inseparable, but I am no train buff.


One might also ponder why the Doc didn't just stuff a long tube full with gunpowder, put a shaped nozzle at one end & call it a solid rocket motor - but perhaps that is for another question.. (starts hummin' to the tune of Rocket 88..)



Answer



First question: It's probably been that way for the whole story to work (otherwise they'd just have lost Clara before the Point of No Return - or something like that.


There have indeed been different steam engines, some requiring a tender, some having a small built-in tender (they could use for shorter routes). I can't watch the movie right now, but I'm sure they've had a separate one only (one you could detach).


However, there's another fact you're ignoring: The tender is heavy, yes, but this additional weight also makes the whole train more stable. So I could also think, that - with the tender detached and the improved velocity - the train would no longer run stable and probably even derail. So the whole thing might have been left there intentionally.


To cite the German wikipedia: A useful side effect is the usually heavy tender (fully loaded 50-70 t for Europe or 130-205 t for the US), which will stabilize the often unruly and twitching train, caused by the free mass forces of the engine (especially for trains with two cylinders). Due to this the tender is connected without play, but not fixed." (Few more details in my comments.)


Second question: This might have been out of the question for him (lack of resources and time). After all, they had just a limited timeframe to work with (their primary reason for leaving immediately has been Doc's approaching date of death).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed....
Post a Comment
Read more

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...
Post a Comment
Read more