Skip to main content

movie - Why was the tender still attached?


Apart from the opportunity for Clara Clayton to have an exciting traversal of the distance between the back of the fuel tender and the engine (Golly!) in Back to the Future III: Was there any reason to leave the tender attached to the engine?



  1. Fully loaded, it would probably weigh half as much as the engine itself. The less mass a surface vehicle is hauling, the quicker it can accelerate.

  2. For fuel they were mostly relying on the color coded burn sticks the Doc used in his furnace. Even if they'd needed extra fuel beyond that, they could've stocked the furnace & detached the tender when they stopped for the car. It was not far from there to the point of '88 or bust'.



I don't think I've ever seen a steam engine traveling with no tender. So it might be that a steam train and its tender are effectively inseparable, but I am no train buff.


One might also ponder why the Doc didn't just stuff a long tube full with gunpowder, put a shaped nozzle at one end & call it a solid rocket motor - but perhaps that is for another question.. (starts hummin' to the tune of Rocket 88..)



Answer



First question: It's probably been that way for the whole story to work (otherwise they'd just have lost Clara before the Point of No Return - or something like that.


There have indeed been different steam engines, some requiring a tender, some having a small built-in tender (they could use for shorter routes). I can't watch the movie right now, but I'm sure they've had a separate one only (one you could detach).


However, there's another fact you're ignoring: The tender is heavy, yes, but this additional weight also makes the whole train more stable. So I could also think, that - with the tender detached and the improved velocity - the train would no longer run stable and probably even derail. So the whole thing might have been left there intentionally.


To cite the German wikipedia: A useful side effect is the usually heavy tender (fully loaded 50-70 t for Europe or 130-205 t for the US), which will stabilize the often unruly and twitching train, caused by the free mass forces of the engine (especially for trains with two cylinders). Due to this the tender is connected without play, but not fixed." (Few more details in my comments.)


Second question: This might have been out of the question for him (lack of resources and time). After all, they had just a limited timeframe to work with (their primary reason for leaving immediately has been Doc's approaching date of death).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more