Skip to main content

harry potter - Did Lord Voldemort not know that Snape was an accomplished Occlumens?


Severus Snape gives a detailed explanation to each of Bellatrix Lestrange's accusations in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.


From what he says, I cannot help wondering if he ever used Occlumency against Lord Voldemort.


As well, is it not equally likely that he could have used the same against Dumbledore? In the book Half-Blood Prince, it is evident that Dumbledore did know of Snape's ability to use Occlumency (judging from the fact Dumbledore asked Snape to teach Occlumency to Harry), and, by his nature, had nothing but "trust" alone to believe in Snape's loyalty.


Yet, why is Lord Voldemort unsuspecting in this matter?




Answer



As E.T. said, Voldemort does not trust and leaves nothing to chance, but there are other reasons he had for believing that Snape was incapable of hiding information from him.


First, there are two branches of mind-manipulation in the Potterverse. The first is Occlumency and the second is Legilimency. Occlumency is purely defensive. Snape tells Harry in OotP chapter 24:



"Occlumency, Potter. The magical defense of the mind against external penetration. An obscure branch of magic, but a highly useful one."



Later in the same chapter, Snape and Harry have another conversation:



Snape looked back at him for a moment and then said contempuously, "Surely even you could have worked that out by now, Potter. The Dark Lord is highly skilled in Legilimency--" "What's that? Sir?" "It is the ability to extract feelings and memories from another person's mind--"




There are several reasons Voldemort would have known about Snape's abilities as an Occlumens:



  1. Voldemort knew he, personally, was a skilled Legilimens. He used the ability frequently to determine if those around him were lying to him, he used Legilimency and his connection to Harry to delve into Harry's mind and manipulate him, and it was probably unfathomable to him that anyone could be more skilled at Occlumency than he was at Legilimency.

  2. According to this timeline of Severus Snape at the Harry Potter Lexicon, Snape joined the Deatheaters when he was roughly 18/19 years old. Thus, if I interpret it correctly, he was a Deatheater before he was a member of the Order of the Phoenix. Voldemort knew the strengths and weaknesses of his followers--especially those Deatheaters who were higher up in the organization. Having an Occlumens at your disposal had the potential to be very useful, and while Voldemort himself could practice Legilimency, there is nothing to suggest that being skilled in one necessarily meant you were also skilled in the other. Had Snape joined the Deatheaters after aligning himself with the OotP, or if he'd still had serious ties to the Order or Hogwarts when he joined, I would agree that he might have tried to keep the secret, but at the time he really had nothing to hide.

  3. It would have been more dangerous for Snape to attempt to conceal his Occlumency from Voldemort than it would be for him to be up-front about it. Keeping such a skill secret from the Dark Lord would have appeared to be nothing less than treacherous, and we know what Voldemort did to followers whose loyalty appeared to waver.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF
Post a Comment
Read more

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...
Post a Comment
Read more