Skip to main content

history of - What is the origin of the word "terrans" when referring to humanoids and other earth-related things?


Quite often in science fiction we read an Alien character say:



"They're going to the Terran system".


"That's a Terran ship."


"They're from the planet Terra".




I get that Terra is the Latin name for Earth. I'm trying to work out how it became a science fiction idiom for referring to things from Earth, or things near the Earth. (Our solar system being the Terran system.) It feels like a jump that the Aliens would know Latin.


My question is: What is the origin of the word "terrans" when referring to humanoids and other earth-related things?



Answer



We don't have to assume that the aliens know Latin! The supposition is that the future humans call their home planet Terra instead of Earth and call themselves Terrans, and the aliens follow suit. The idea is that, in a science-fictional future where space travel is commonplace, the Earth, instead of being the World, is a place; and, like any other place, it should have a proper name, instead of a common noun meaning "dirt". (I've been told that, if you know Latin, then "Terra" is no better than "Earth", and "Tellus" would be a better choice. In fact, in some science fiction stories the Earth is called Tellus and its people are Tellurians.)


According to the Science Fiction Citations site, the earliest known use of "Terran" as a noun meaning "an inhabitant of the planet Earth" (aka Earthian, Earthie, Earthling, Earthman, Tellurian, Terrestrial, Terrestrian, etc.) was in Astounding Science-Fiction, May 1946 (available at the Internet Archive), in part 3 of the serialization of George O. Smith's novel Pattern for Conquest:



The mission, not entirely understood by the Terrans, consists of destroying a machine sent forth by the Loard-vogh, a race that is conquering the Galaxy on a twenty-thousand-year program. This machine restricts mental activity through a vast area, thus permitting the Loard-vogh to advance without difficulty. Communication between the Little People of Tlembo and Terrans is also restricted by the machine, and so the true nature of the mission is not really known.



The earliest citation for "Terran" as an adjective is from the same 1946 George O. Smith story:




"Seventeen million of the Loard-vogh died in the Battle of Sol, and more than half of them perished because Terran spores crept into chinks in their space armor. Chinks so small that they do not permit loss of air in space.



However, the form "Terrane" was seen earlier, in the 1881 novel Three Hundred Years Hence by William Delisle Hay:



I am speaking of the Terrane Exodus and the Cities of the Sea.



The earliest citation for "Terra" as a name for the planet Earth is from an 1871 lecture "Science & Revelation" by Robert Payne Smith:



Now, let us suppose ourselves philosophers come, we will say, from the planet Jupiter, on a mission intrusted to us by the Jovians, to examine and report upon the nature of the creatures which people the four inferior planets, Terra, Venus, Mercury, and Mars.




Jeff Prucher, an associate of the Science Fiction Citations site, wrote the following essay on "Earthlings" in his Hugo-winning book Brave New Words: The Oxford Dictionary of Science Fiction:



In science fiction, when beings from different worlds encounter each other, they are generally named by their planet or star of origin; thus Martians are from Mars, and Sirians are from some hypothetical planet orbiting the star Sirius. While there are generally few terms in use for beings from any given planet or solar system, there is much greater variety in the terms for people who are from Earth. Many of these terms have been in use for centuries in other senses. Some, such as Earthling and Terrestrial, originally designated earthly (as opposed to heavenly or spiritual) beings. Terrestrian was once an adjective used to describe animals that lived on land rather than in water. Earth-man and -woman once referred only to beings that were associated with soil or the ground in some way; once SF writers got hold of them, they added Earth-folk, Earth-girl, and Earth-person as variations. SF writers also coined the fairly common terms Terran, Tellurian (after Tellus, the Roman goddess of the earth), Earther, Earthian, and Earthie, in addition to many more that never quite caught on, including Earthan, Terrene, and Terrestial. However, when faced with creatures from another star system entirely, beings from the Moon or Jupiter may seem slightly less alien, and so the word Solarian was coined to refer to any inhabitant of Earth's solar system, human or otherwise—Earthling, Martian, and Plutonian alike.



Update. Here is an earlier (by one month) citation for "Terran" as a noun, from part 2 of the searialization of George. O. Smith's Pattern for Conquest, in Astounding Science Fiction, April 1946, available at the Internet Archive. The quotation is from p. 10, column 2:



Neckal spoke: "The battle progresses."

Vorgan frowned. "Why or how can one so small defend himself against one of the Planet of Terror?"

"The Little Man is agile and the Terran is clumsy."

Lindoo nodded. "We may both curse and praise that. If the Terran were less clumsy, he might well be more difficult for Kregar."



There are still earlier citations for "Terran" as an adjective in part 1 of the same serial, in Astounding Science Fiction, March 1946, also available at the Internet Archive. This quotation is from p. 9, column 1:




Stellor Downing was Martian by birth and by six hundred years of Martian-born forebears. His family could trace its line back to the first group of Terran colonists that braved the rigors of Martian life before technology created a Martian world that was reasonably well adapted for human life.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...