Skip to main content

star wars - Why do the Jedi insist on the concept of "No Attachment"?



At the surface, it sounds like a complete butchering of the Buddhist concept of attachment, which is not what most people think, and has more to do with more to do with denying ourselves suffering and pain (the dukkha) than forcing ourselves to become closer to fellow human beings. The tenet is most often expressed as the fact the Jedi don't marry - which is closer aligned to Catholicism with roots in theology.


Considering:




  1. There isn't anything central to the "Light Side" which prohibits love, romance or marriage

  2. The Jedi's restrictions on Anakins emotions ...



... help create the greatest mass murderer that the Galaxy has ever seen



Is there some in-unviverse basis as to why this concept is even remotely a good idea? This is noting that the New Jedi Order seems to start a reversal on the idea. Is this because it was proven such a colossal failure?



Answer



In Episode IV Obi-Wan claims, "for a thousand generations, the Jedi were the guardians of peace and justice in the galaxy." Taking at this at face value, if their traditions had worked for 20,000 years or more they must have been doing something right. Historical orders of warrior monks, such as the Knights Templar or Buddhist sects in Japan, have been quite successful for centuries.



In Episode I, Yoda believes Anakin is too old to be trained as a Jedi, at the age of nine or so. In Episodes II and III, we see younglings who are no more than four or five. This suggests Jedi begin their training at a very young age indeed, perhaps in infancy. The training (brainwashing?) to reject attachment may be more effective when the recipient starts so young.


That said, in Episodes I-III the Jedi are distinctly arrogant and complacent. In Episode II, Mace Windu asserts it is "not in his character" for Count Dooku to do anything evil, which turns out to be quite wrong. And of course, they fail completely to notice Palpatine's schemes.


As noted in Richard's answer, Obi-Wan seems blind to the possibility of a romantic relationship between Anakin and Padme. At the beginning of Episode III, Anakin is spending the night in Padme's apartment instead of some Jedi barracks, but no one seems to notice. (That, or the Jedi are deliberately turning a blind eye to it, which would be a colossal failure of judgment.) Later, when Anakin is in obvious distress (video in Richard's answer), Yoda fails to show compassion or give any helpful advice, instead just repeating Jedi doctrine at him.


All in all, the Jedi of the prequels are a pathetic lot. Their rules may have served them well in the past, but they are totally inadequate for the case of Anakin. So to answer your question, simply telling Anakin to reject attachment is a terrible idea, but the Jedi don't realise that until it is far too late.


In Episodes IV-VI, I think Obi-Wan and Yoda know this. They are old and haunted by their past failures. For them, Luke is a desperate throw of the dice to try and bring down the Empire.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

harry potter - What is the difference between Diffindo and Sectumsempra?

In the Harry Potter books, Diffindo is called the 'Severing Charm' and it’s most commonly used to cut ropes and the like. However, in the last book Hermione uses it on Ron but misses, creating a 'slash in his jeans' and his knee gets cut, causing him to 'roar in pain'. We've only seen Sectumsempra used once on screen when Harry directly uses it on Malfoy in the sixth book, but there it's mentioned that he is 'waving his wand wildly'. Wouldn't Diffindo, if used in such a fashion also cause a similar effect? Similarly, if it was able to cut Ron, it would also be able to, say, chop off an ear (George's)? In that case, how are these two spells different, except for Sectumsempra seemingly used exclusively to hurt humans? Answer While Diffindo and Sectumsempra both can be countered by other spells, Diffindo is far more easily countered. Reparo, a relatively common spell, can completely reverse its effect when used once. “He pulled the old cop...