Skip to main content

Are there any lawyers mentioned in Harry Potter?


I remember 3 cases of court scenes in Harry Potter, one in Dumbledore's memory about the questioning of Karkaroff and sentencing of Barty Crouch Jr. after WWI (Wizarding War I), one in OotP for Harry's disciplinary hearing, and one in the last book about questioning of Mrs. Cattermole. In all these cases the defendant is left to fend for him/herself. In Harry's case, Dumbledore has to come and defend him and he's not a lawyer either.


Do all the court cases shown in the books depict special circumstances, or is that how the wizard legal system works, where the Ministry directly accuses a person and he has to personally defend himself? Do lawyers exist in the Potterverse? Are they ever mentioned? (I am interested in a book answer, but movies or anything else are fine too)



Answer




There does appear to be some manner of a legal profession in the Wizarding World; Scrimgeour hints at one in Deathly Hallows, in response to Hermione rules-lawyering1 him (emphasis mine):



"The Decree for Justifiable Confiscation gives the Ministry the power to confiscate the contents of a will —"


"That law was created to stop wizards passing on Dark artifacts," said Hermione, "and the Ministry is supposed to have powerful evidence that the deceased's possessions are illegal before seizing them! Are you telling me that you thought Dumbledore was trying to pass us something cursed?"


"Are you planning to follow a career in Magical Law, Miss Granger?" asked Scrimgeour.


Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Chapter 7: "The Will of Albus Dumbledore"



What form that takes is unclear, as we see no evidence of magical barristers or solicitors in the extended Potter canon. Perhaps the only legal authority is the legislature, perhaps the Department of Magical Law Enforcement has a public defender service, or perhaps there are private legal professionals.


For my part, I suspect that they exist, because lawyers are an emergent property of a legal system and labour specialization: as long as you have laws you will have some people who are better at understanding, interpreting, and arguing them, which created economic incentive for those people to sell their services. At the very least you would expect non-advocate solicitors, or somebody you could pay to give you legal advice; if defendants are allowed "help" in Wizengamot trials (which they appear to be, at least under some circumstances), you would also expect professional advocates to spring up, and at that point you basically have laywers as we know them.


However, I would note that the court cases we see in the books are quite unusual, and convened under extraordinary circumstances:




  • The Death Eater hearings in Dumbledore's memories come at the tail end of a quite miserable war that everybody just wants to be done with already

  • Harry's case is one in which the Minister is actively bending the law (as noted by Dumbledore) for political purposes

  • The Cattermole case is a kangaroo court in the extreme, where the defendant's guilt has already been decided and Umbridge just wants to feel powerful for a few minutes


Although the British Ministry is notoriously corrupt and ineffectual, it's not clear that these cases are representative of the general trend.



1 TVTropes link. It's dangerous to go alone


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more