Skip to main content

harry potter - Was Isolt Sayre a Parselmouth or not?


After reading the Pottermore article on "Ilvermorny School of Witchcraft and Wizardry," by J.K. Rowling, it's unclear to me whether Isolt Sayre was a Parselmouth.


Based on what I remember from reading the Harry Potter books, I would define the term "Parselmouth" as follows:



  • A Parselmouth is a person who exhibits the magical ability to understand snakes, hearing what they "say" in verbal form, and who also is able to communicate verbally with snakes by speaking the language Parseltongue. A Parselmouth can speak and understand Parseltongue without being taught. Based on Harry's experience, Parselmouths don't necessarily realize when they are speaking Parseltongue: it happens automatically when they talk to snakes. And similarly, the speech of snakes, and other Parselmouths speaking Parseltongue, apparently sounds to Parselmouths like whatever human language they would expect to hear.


We additionally know that being a Parselmouth is extremely rare and strongly associated with being a descendant of Slytherin.


According to the Ilvermorny article, Isolt Sayre was a descendant of Slytherin who "claimed to understand" a Horned Serpent she encountered in North America—something that surprised another North American magical creature, the Pukwudgie William.


In addition, one of her daughters was rumored to have the ability to speak Parseltongue:




There was a rumour, never confirmed by her family, that, unlike her sister Martha, Rionach was born with the ability to speak Parseltongue and that she was determined not to pass on Slytherin ancestry into the next generation



But on the other hand, the article also says that "Isolt could not speak the language [Parseltongue]". This is given as an explanation for why Isolt is unable to activate Slytherin's wand, which had been taught to "sleep" when given a special command in Parseltongue. I initially thought that this quote clearly established that Isolt was not a Parselmouth of any kind.


Unfortunately, after thinking it over a bit, I became less sure, because I started to think that this statement maybe could be interpreted in context as meaning that Isolt, unlike her evil aunt Gormlaith, could not intentionally produce Parseltongue; i.e. outside of the context of speaking directly to snakes. We see in the books that Harry, who seems to have acquired all the innate abilities of a Parselmouth, initially cannot speak in Parseltongue except for when he is talking to a snake: to get into the Chamber of Secrets, he has to practice a bit by imagining that a scratched image of a snake is a real snake that he is talking to. There are no indications that Isolt ever tried anything like this: in fact, we are told that she didn't want to activate the wand anyway ("she no longer wanted to touch the wand that was the last relic of her unhappy childhood").


So based just on the information in these quotes, the situation seems a bit ambiguous to me. Does anybody know of any more information that would resolve this ambiguity one way or another? There might be something else in the article that I've missed, or there might be more information in other material written by J.K.R. that would indicate whether Isolt Sayre was born with the ability to speak to snakes using Parseltongue.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...