Skip to main content

Why does dragon fire from Game of Thrones leave bones?


Before the dragons from the TV series have grown we learned from the pyromancer that wildfire was the closest they could get to dragon fire. According to him the wildfire could burn through metal, stone, and flesh.


We could also saw how dragon fire could destroy the keep leaving great big holes in the walls.


Later when Dany's dragons grew up and started hunting we could see that they ate goats and a poor child leaving nothing but burned bones behind. How come the bones were left if the fire is so strong?


Also, if the fire was that strong, how does Dany expect that a metal chain and a door could keep them?



Answer




How come the bones were left if the fire is so strong?




You must bear in mind that we had no idea how exactly the bones came to be. Drogon was said to have been responsible for them, but there are a few scenarios which this could have happened:



  • he might have just been burning something nearby, or

  • might have just devoured the carcass, passing the bones (which were scorched due to the insides of the dragon being extremely hot, or

  • the bones might have been cooked in an oven as suspected by Dany (for the sheep anyway)



Also, if the fire was that strong, how does Dany expect that a metal chain and a door could keep them?



Chains Were Made to be Broken

The metal chains were only truly to get the dragons into the pit, beyond that there was no guarantee that the chains would hold. In fact, Viserion had actually broken through his:


[A Dance With Dragons spoiler]



The dragons craned their necks around, gazing at them with burning eyes. Viserion had shattered one chain and melted the others. He clung to the roof of the pit like some huge white bat, his claws dug deep into the burnt and crumbling bricks. Rhaegal, still chained, was gnawing on the carcass of a bull. The bones on the floor of the pit were deeper than the last time she had been down here, and the walls and floors were black and grey, more ash than brick. They would not hold much longer … but behind them was only earth and stone. Can dragons tunnel through rock, like the firewyrms of old Valyria? She hoped not.
-A Song of Ice and Fire: A Dance With Dragons, Part Two - Blood and Fire (Daenerys).



Perhaps given time, they could burn through the walls/doors (but that's just conjecture).
Take note also that there are a pile of bones. We don't know if they are scorched or not, but that definitely shows that an encounter with a dragon can leave bones behind!


The Blood of Old Valyria
There are some whom the dragons might take a liking to, or at least tolerate:



[A Dance With Dragons spoiler]



Brown Ben Plumm is one such person; he can trace his ancestry back to Old Valyria, and there are many mentions of how the dragons took a liking to him, especially this one:

[Tyrion:] Your branch sprouted from a stone spit across the narrow sea, no doubt. A younger son of Viserys Plumm, I’d wager. The queen’s dragons were fond of you, were they not?”
That seemed to amuse the sellsword. [Plumm:]“Who told you that?”
[Tyrion:]“No one. Most of the stories you hear about dragons are fodder for fools. Talking dragons, dragons hoarding gold and gems, dragons with four legs and bellies big as elephants, dragons riddling with sphinxes … nonsense, all of it. But there are truths in the old books as well. Not only do I know that the queen’s dragons took to you, but I know why.”
[Plumm:]“My mother said my father had a drop of dragon blood.”
-A Song of Ice and Fire: A Dance With Dragons, Part Two - Blood and Fire (Tyrion).



Using this to one's advantage can help to provide a means for controlling dragons.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...