Skip to main content

harry potter - Why did Scabbers bite Goyle?


When Malfoy, Crabbe and Goyle come into Harry and Ron's compartment, and Goyle tries to take a chocolate frog, Scabbers bites him:




Goyle reached toward the Chocolate Frogs next to Ron — Ron leapt forward, but before he’d so much as touched Goyle, Goyle let out a horrible yell. Scabbers the rat was hanging off his finger, sharp little teeth sunk deep into Goyle’s knuckle — Crabbe and Malfoy backed away as Goyle swung Scabbers round and round, howling, and when Scabbers finally flew off and hit the window, all three of them disappeared at once.
-- Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 6



It is revealed in later books that



Scabbers is in fact Peter Pettigrew in his Animagus form.



Considering this, why would Scabbers bother going to the trouble of biting Goyle? Did years of being with the Weasleys make him somewhat loyal to them?



Answer





There's no obvious reason for Peter Pettigrew to want to bite Gregory Goyle over a Chocolate Frog. I think that Raditz_35 is right to point out that Wormtail operated out of self-interest. So he was loyal to Ron insofar as that loyalty helped to maintain his cover and thus sustain the comfortable lifestyle he enjoyed whilst waiting for news about Voldemort.



"You weren't willing to commit murder right under Albus Dumbledore's nose, for a wreck of a wizard who'd lost all his power, were you? You'd want to make sure he was the biggest bully in the playground before you went back to him, wouldn't you? Why else did you find a wizard family to take you in? Keeping an ear out for news, weren't you, Peter? Just in case your old protector regained strength, and it was safe to rejoin him..."
(Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 19, The Servant of Lord Voldemort).



Performing these sorts of actions certainly made him a faithful rat in his own eyes.



And he scrambled around to Ron.
"Ron...haven't I been a good friend...a good pet? You won't let them kill me, Ron, will you...you're on my side, aren't you?"

(Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 19, The Servant of Lord Voldemort).



Wormtail's actions in attacking Goyle were also respected by Ron, who honoured Wormtail as a loyal rat when he believed he was dead.



"All he did was eat and sleep, Ron, you said it yourself," said George.
"He bit Goyle for us once!" Ron said miserably. "Remember, Harry?"
"Yeah, that's true," said Harry.
"His finest hour," said Fred, unable to keep a straight face. "Let the scar on Goyle's finger stand as a lasting tribute to his memory."
(Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 13, Gryffindor versus Ravenclaw).




Clearly, as far as Ron (and Fred) was concerned, Wormtail's actions were gallant and brave. Selective acts of loyalty such as this were worthwhile to Wormtail in exchange for staying in the Weasleys' good books when the alternative was fending for himself. He had a comfy life as a household pet, with free accommodation, food and protection. And, as Sirius says, at the Burrow he was well-placed to hear news about the potential return of Voldemort.


Besides, his attack on Goyle doesn't seem to have cost him much...



"I think he's been knocked out," Ron said to Harry. He looked closer at Scabbers. "No - I don't believe it - he's gone back to sleep."
And so he had.
(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 6, The Journey from Platform Nine and Three-Quarters).



Plot-twist speculation


There is actually one reason that comes to mind which explains Wormtail's actions, although it's not really supported by anything concrete. Gregory Goyle is the son of a Death Eater. Wormtail risked his life by switching sides and betraying the Potters. Straight after casting his lot in with Voldemort his master is vanquished and he is pursued by a murderous Sirius Black. Wormtail may have felt that he'd sacrificed rather a lot for the Dark side and not got anything back in return by means of protection or recognition. He'd had to fend for himself. Wormtail may have felt bitter towards the Death Eaters at this point. Perhaps he hadn't come into contact with any before that fateful day. Then all of a sudden the sons of three Death Eaters who walked free - Malfoy, Crabbe and Goyle - stroll into the compartment. Wormtail, filled with rage, took a small portion of his revenge by biting one of them on the finger. When he gets shaken off he feins sleep and nobody is any the wiser...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...