Skip to main content

harry potter - Why did Scabbers bite Goyle?


When Malfoy, Crabbe and Goyle come into Harry and Ron's compartment, and Goyle tries to take a chocolate frog, Scabbers bites him:




Goyle reached toward the Chocolate Frogs next to Ron — Ron leapt forward, but before he’d so much as touched Goyle, Goyle let out a horrible yell. Scabbers the rat was hanging off his finger, sharp little teeth sunk deep into Goyle’s knuckle — Crabbe and Malfoy backed away as Goyle swung Scabbers round and round, howling, and when Scabbers finally flew off and hit the window, all three of them disappeared at once.
-- Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 6



It is revealed in later books that



Scabbers is in fact Peter Pettigrew in his Animagus form.



Considering this, why would Scabbers bother going to the trouble of biting Goyle? Did years of being with the Weasleys make him somewhat loyal to them?



Answer





There's no obvious reason for Peter Pettigrew to want to bite Gregory Goyle over a Chocolate Frog. I think that Raditz_35 is right to point out that Wormtail operated out of self-interest. So he was loyal to Ron insofar as that loyalty helped to maintain his cover and thus sustain the comfortable lifestyle he enjoyed whilst waiting for news about Voldemort.



"You weren't willing to commit murder right under Albus Dumbledore's nose, for a wreck of a wizard who'd lost all his power, were you? You'd want to make sure he was the biggest bully in the playground before you went back to him, wouldn't you? Why else did you find a wizard family to take you in? Keeping an ear out for news, weren't you, Peter? Just in case your old protector regained strength, and it was safe to rejoin him..."
(Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 19, The Servant of Lord Voldemort).



Performing these sorts of actions certainly made him a faithful rat in his own eyes.



And he scrambled around to Ron.
"Ron...haven't I been a good friend...a good pet? You won't let them kill me, Ron, will you...you're on my side, aren't you?"

(Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 19, The Servant of Lord Voldemort).



Wormtail's actions in attacking Goyle were also respected by Ron, who honoured Wormtail as a loyal rat when he believed he was dead.



"All he did was eat and sleep, Ron, you said it yourself," said George.
"He bit Goyle for us once!" Ron said miserably. "Remember, Harry?"
"Yeah, that's true," said Harry.
"His finest hour," said Fred, unable to keep a straight face. "Let the scar on Goyle's finger stand as a lasting tribute to his memory."
(Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 13, Gryffindor versus Ravenclaw).




Clearly, as far as Ron (and Fred) was concerned, Wormtail's actions were gallant and brave. Selective acts of loyalty such as this were worthwhile to Wormtail in exchange for staying in the Weasleys' good books when the alternative was fending for himself. He had a comfy life as a household pet, with free accommodation, food and protection. And, as Sirius says, at the Burrow he was well-placed to hear news about the potential return of Voldemort.


Besides, his attack on Goyle doesn't seem to have cost him much...



"I think he's been knocked out," Ron said to Harry. He looked closer at Scabbers. "No - I don't believe it - he's gone back to sleep."
And so he had.
(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 6, The Journey from Platform Nine and Three-Quarters).



Plot-twist speculation


There is actually one reason that comes to mind which explains Wormtail's actions, although it's not really supported by anything concrete. Gregory Goyle is the son of a Death Eater. Wormtail risked his life by switching sides and betraying the Potters. Straight after casting his lot in with Voldemort his master is vanquished and he is pursued by a murderous Sirius Black. Wormtail may have felt that he'd sacrificed rather a lot for the Dark side and not got anything back in return by means of protection or recognition. He'd had to fend for himself. Wormtail may have felt bitter towards the Death Eaters at this point. Perhaps he hadn't come into contact with any before that fateful day. Then all of a sudden the sons of three Death Eaters who walked free - Malfoy, Crabbe and Goyle - stroll into the compartment. Wormtail, filled with rage, took a small portion of his revenge by biting one of them on the finger. When he gets shaken off he feins sleep and nobody is any the wiser...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

game of thrones - Who were the Kingsguard escorting Cersei?

Now to the question... During the scene where Cersei sits on the Iron Throne and is "sworn in" we see her escorted by seven members of the Kingsguard. Now this is what I would expect as that is the correct number. However, I have no idea who they are ! [embedded content] The books pay more attention to detail in this area, but the show is also diverging and outpacing in this regard. We can see that a few of the names are not possible on the show. I have listed the names from the books and given why the reason they could not be members on the show in bold. Ser Jaime Lannister, Lord Commander - Stripped of title Ser Loras Tyrell - Dead and also was never a KG on the show. Ser Osmund Kettleblack - Possible, but not mentioned by name Ser Balon Swann - Possible, but not mentioned by name Ser Meryn Trant - Dead Ser Boros Blount - Possible, but not mentioned by name Ser Robert Strong (aka Zombie Mountain) - Confirmed I know it can be confusing mixing the books and shows, but the qu

harry potter - Was Barty Crouch Jr. an Occlumens?

An Occlumens is a practitioner of Occlumency , while Occlumency means closing the mind. Despite being in the same school with two great Legilimens (Dumbledore and Snape), he was only discovered to be an impostor after the last round of the Triwizard Tournament in Goblet of Fire : “Moody,” Harry said. He was still in a state of complete disbelief. “How can it have been Moody?” “This is not Alastor Moody,” said Dumbledore quietly. “You have never known Alastor Moody. The real Moody would not have removed you from my sight after what happened tonight. The moment he took you, I knew — and I followed.” Does this mean that Barty Crouch Jr. is an Occlumens? Because if not, then Snape or Dumbledore would have found it out earlier, right? Answer It is not stated anywhere in the books that Legilimency was applied to fake Moody/Crouch jr. The conclusion Dumbledore made (quoted in the question) is based on pure logic, not Legilimency or any other magical means. So unless any other canon inform

transformers - How do Soundwave, Megatron, etc. change size and mass?

The original G1 Soundwave changed from a cassette deck (don't know what it is? Ask your parents!) to a robot that was the same size as robots that changed into cars. Similarly, Megatron changed into a gun that could be held by humans. And other robots, all of similar sizes, changed into objects of different sizes: cassettes, cars, trucks and huge jets. (One Autobot triple changer, Broadside , changed from an aircraft to an aircraft carrier!) Was this impossible feat ever explained? Or was it hand-wavey magic, like the Hulk ? Answer Although there wasn't even an acknowledgement of changes in size in the animated shows (i.e. that's just how things were), there have been a few explanations within comics. The ones listed and described by the Teletraan I Transformers Wiki are as follows: Parts compression (from Dreamwave comics): The notion that the Transformers in question, such as Astrotrain and Broadside, had many dense layers of armor in robot mode, which then slid ou

Why Was It 'Essential' That Voldemort Kill Harry Potter?

‘So the boy ... the boy must die?’ asked Snape, quite calmly. ‘And Voldemort himself must do it, Severus. That is essential.’ Deathly Hallows - page 551 - UK Hardcover - chapter 33, The Prince's Tale Dumbledore tells Snape it is 'essential' that Voldemort be the one to kill Harry, I'm assuming in order for the piece of Voldemort's soul in Harry to be properly killed as well. But why? Hermione destroyed the Hufflepuff cup; Ron destroyed the Slytherin locket; Neville killed Nagini; Harry destroyed the diadem and Tom Riddle's diary. So the Horcruxes were not immune to destruction at the hand of someone other than Voldemort. And as it ended up, Harry himself wasn't even a Horcrux, but rather just an unknowing host to a parasitic bit of Voldemort's soul. Why was it 'essential' that Voldemort be the one to kill Harry in order for the piece of Voldemort's soul to die? Answer I thought it had to do with the protection Harry's mother gave him b