Skip to main content

star trek - How did Picard send a binary message to Data in the future?


In the Star Trek TNG episode "Times Arrow", parts one and two, recall the following:



  • Data's head was found in an excavation on Earth that dates from the 19th century (it actually is Data's head).

  • Data, Picard, Crusher, Worf, and others go back in time to the 19th century to investigate.

  • Guinan (her 500-year younger self) was living in San Francisco in the 19th century.

  • This is where Guinan first meets Picard, but not where Picard first meets Guinan.

  • It turns out that alien time travelers are sucking energy out of people on Earth from the 19th century.

  • In the process, Data is caught in an altercation which essentially blows his head off.



Here's where things get especially interesting...



  • In an effort to stop these aliens, all of the away team along with Samuel Clemens, except Picard and Guinan end up back in the future to try to destroy the aliens time travel site on their planet.

  • Picard, still in the 19th century finds out from one of the aliens that if the Enterprise in the future fires upon the alien time travel site, the energy from the ship's phasers will only serve to increase the aliens' power.

  • Commander LaForge manages to reassemble the 500 year old Data head, after removing a suspicious piece of metal lodged in one of Data's cranial ports. "How did that get in there?" LaForge asks.

  • We are then taken back in time to see Picard is responsible for putting the metal piece in there. He also enters a binary message into Data's static memory warning the Enterprise not to fire on the alien site.

  • Data (reassembled) receives this message, and the crew make a plan to destroy the alien site by making a tweak to the ship's weapons.

  • Before destroying the site, Samuel Clemens goes back in time and allows Picard to return to the 24th century


Everybody wins! What an awesome episode!



But here's the rub


From Picard's perspective, he simply entered the binary message into Data's head, and then was immediately rescued. I should think that Picard would have had to have lived a lifetime in the 19th century, then died, and then 500 years later, Data's head would be found. At this point, the static memory in Data's head warning the Enterprise would be there legitimately and the episode could continue as normal.


So how does entering the binary message into Data's static memory seemingly transcend the space time continuum and make it to the future?



Answer



Welcome to the Grandfather Paradox. Start with the Wikipedia article.


There are at least four ways to handle this:




  1. Picard's actions form a self-determining loop. That is, the origins of his actions are contained entirely with the loop. The classic along these lines is Heinlein's All You Zombies.





  2. When Picard altered Data's memory, he created a parallel universe (timeline) in which the data exists/existed/will exist. When the team returned from the past, they entered this new timeline. In the old timeline, they never returned.




  3. When Picard altered Data's memory, he created a history which overwrote the original history which caused him to go back in time. The original history, in which Data's memory was not modified, ceases to "exist", as far as the word applies.




  4. There's no problem. The away team went back in time without having performed a detailed examination of Data's head. So it had always been modified, and Picard's actions had always occurred. Again, as far as the word "always" applies.





An excellent discussion of the peculiarities of time travel (from a purely speculative viewpoint, of course) is Larry Niven's The Theory and Practice of Time Travel


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

game of thrones - Who were the Kingsguard escorting Cersei?

Now to the question... During the scene where Cersei sits on the Iron Throne and is "sworn in" we see her escorted by seven members of the Kingsguard. Now this is what I would expect as that is the correct number. However, I have no idea who they are ! [embedded content] The books pay more attention to detail in this area, but the show is also diverging and outpacing in this regard. We can see that a few of the names are not possible on the show. I have listed the names from the books and given why the reason they could not be members on the show in bold. Ser Jaime Lannister, Lord Commander - Stripped of title Ser Loras Tyrell - Dead and also was never a KG on the show. Ser Osmund Kettleblack - Possible, but not mentioned by name Ser Balon Swann - Possible, but not mentioned by name Ser Meryn Trant - Dead Ser Boros Blount - Possible, but not mentioned by name Ser Robert Strong (aka Zombie Mountain) - Confirmed I know it can be confusing mixing the books and shows, but the qu

harry potter - Was Barty Crouch Jr. an Occlumens?

An Occlumens is a practitioner of Occlumency , while Occlumency means closing the mind. Despite being in the same school with two great Legilimens (Dumbledore and Snape), he was only discovered to be an impostor after the last round of the Triwizard Tournament in Goblet of Fire : “Moody,” Harry said. He was still in a state of complete disbelief. “How can it have been Moody?” “This is not Alastor Moody,” said Dumbledore quietly. “You have never known Alastor Moody. The real Moody would not have removed you from my sight after what happened tonight. The moment he took you, I knew — and I followed.” Does this mean that Barty Crouch Jr. is an Occlumens? Because if not, then Snape or Dumbledore would have found it out earlier, right? Answer It is not stated anywhere in the books that Legilimency was applied to fake Moody/Crouch jr. The conclusion Dumbledore made (quoted in the question) is based on pure logic, not Legilimency or any other magical means. So unless any other canon inform

transformers - How do Soundwave, Megatron, etc. change size and mass?

The original G1 Soundwave changed from a cassette deck (don't know what it is? Ask your parents!) to a robot that was the same size as robots that changed into cars. Similarly, Megatron changed into a gun that could be held by humans. And other robots, all of similar sizes, changed into objects of different sizes: cassettes, cars, trucks and huge jets. (One Autobot triple changer, Broadside , changed from an aircraft to an aircraft carrier!) Was this impossible feat ever explained? Or was it hand-wavey magic, like the Hulk ? Answer Although there wasn't even an acknowledgement of changes in size in the animated shows (i.e. that's just how things were), there have been a few explanations within comics. The ones listed and described by the Teletraan I Transformers Wiki are as follows: Parts compression (from Dreamwave comics): The notion that the Transformers in question, such as Astrotrain and Broadside, had many dense layers of armor in robot mode, which then slid ou

Why Was It 'Essential' That Voldemort Kill Harry Potter?

‘So the boy ... the boy must die?’ asked Snape, quite calmly. ‘And Voldemort himself must do it, Severus. That is essential.’ Deathly Hallows - page 551 - UK Hardcover - chapter 33, The Prince's Tale Dumbledore tells Snape it is 'essential' that Voldemort be the one to kill Harry, I'm assuming in order for the piece of Voldemort's soul in Harry to be properly killed as well. But why? Hermione destroyed the Hufflepuff cup; Ron destroyed the Slytherin locket; Neville killed Nagini; Harry destroyed the diadem and Tom Riddle's diary. So the Horcruxes were not immune to destruction at the hand of someone other than Voldemort. And as it ended up, Harry himself wasn't even a Horcrux, but rather just an unknowing host to a parasitic bit of Voldemort's soul. Why was it 'essential' that Voldemort be the one to kill Harry in order for the piece of Voldemort's soul to die? Answer I thought it had to do with the protection Harry's mother gave him b