Skip to main content

Are Star Wars Animals Too Big?


In the original version of Star Wars (or Episode IV), we saw Banthas on Tatooine, but nothing larger. Then in Return of the Jedi, we saw the Sarlacc (which, to be fair, isn't native to Tatooine). In later versions, we saw a number of dewbacks in Mos Eisley. (I've also read about the Krayt Dragon, which is even larger -- we do see a skeleton of one in Episode IV, but no living one or any indication how old the skeleton is.)


The reason this started to bother me is because the Dewbacks reminded me of dinosaurs and I remember reading about how larger dinosaurs were vegetarians because there just were not enough animals that could live in their range that they could eat to get the energy they need.


We see almost nothing growing on Tatooine. Luke's uncle is a farmer, but a moisture farmer, not a food or plant farmer, and there's no other evidence (at least in the movies) of many plants growing on Tatooine.


And on Hoth, Han comments, "There isn't enough life on this ice cube to fill a space cruiser." Again, there's almost no evidence of plant life on Hoth, but the Rebels are using tauntauns (that are native and likely from near where they are) and Luke is captured by a wampa, which is also kind of large.


On both Tatooine and Hoth, we see these animals in areas of little or no vegetation, so unless they all store food for extreme periods of time (to allow for long migrations), they're in or near their natural habitat.


On the other hand, on Dagobah, where there is plant life in abundance, and more than enough to support larger animals, we get only one hint of a big animal (when Artoo is presumably eaten up and spit out under water). (At least on Naboo, there's an abundance of plant life and large animals.)


Are these animals too big to realistically survive on ice and desert planets where there is so little plant life? Is there anything to give us reason to believe there is enough life at the lower end of the food chain, with plants (or maybe some kind of algae or bacteria) that can support such large life forms on these planets?



Answer



Hoth: : Lichens




Fields of lichens grew in Hoth's vast cave grottoes, providing an important source of food for wild tauntauns. These animals also sometimes found lichens on exposed outcroppings on the surface and just below the frost layer. (source: "Galaxy Guide 3: The Empire Strikes Back")





Tatooine::


This one has no explicit in-Universe explanations.


What is known is that:




  • Tatooine was originally modeled on either a desert planet from Flash Gordon, and/or Arrakis.





  • Like Arrakis, it was once a thriving ecology, NOT dessicated desert all around (source). The change was due to bombardment Rakatan Infinite Empire after a rebellion by native Kumumgah race.




  • Krayt dragons fed on banthas, of which there were plenty




  • Banthas were not necessarily native to Tatooine (origin disputed between many words) BUT they were able to survive in almost any extremes of environment and could go without food or water for several weeks, and often were used on desert worlds. Ecologically they might have been similar to camels.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.