Skip to main content

How does the Xenomorph evolution timeline work in the Alien/Predator universe?


I'm wanting to know how the timeline works in the Alien/Predator universe, specifically in relation to the Xenomorph's evolution.



As far as I know the Xenomorph starts its evolution from the end of Prometheus, as an early version of what looks like the Xenomorph appears out of the dead engineer. I assume it then evolves from this into what we see in the original Alien 30 years later.



What I want to know is how this ties in with Alien Vs Predator? As far as I remember, and based on the timeline I've found, the Predators are hunting Xenomorphs on Earth as early as 2896 BC. Alien Vs Predator also seems to be set in 2004 AD. While Prometheus is set in the late 21st century.




What I want to know is if I've got it wrong. I thought it seemed like the Xenomorph was in its first evolution at the end of Prometheus, but is that an alternate species and the Xenomorph was already created 5000+ years before that?



Are there any books/comics/games/movies that help explain this?



If that is the case, and the Xenomorphs have been around thousands of years, it seems strange to me that the Xenomorph in Prometheus looks so similar to the Xenomorphs of the Alien movies (given how quickly they evolve).




Answer



No timeline could properly chart the Xenomorph's changes because we have never seen the original creature in its native environment! Even changes in the creature over the course of the series only reflect the creature as it has taken on new genetic materials wherever it is.


We know the Predators have been bringing them to Earth since before recorded history. Building pyramids at the South pole is a good clue of how long ago this had to have been. We know that the Engineers have had them for at least 2,000 years. But we have no idea of the relationships between the sources of the two creatures and how much evolution has occurred between their different source Xenomorphs.



I don't see the Xenomorph's rapid genetic changes as evolution. I see this as a form of rapid genetic mutation/manipulation where the creature is adapting/mutating depending on the wildlife from which they swap genes with in order to spawn in the local environment.


With such a mutable genetic structure, it would be difficult to determine purely from an appearance point of view, what creature started off as the parent species, or if we have ever seen a genetically pure one.


It would require a genetic scan from a creature that has never left its first home environment to differentiate which form was the original and which features were from the native planet. As I have stated in previous StackExchange conversations on the Xenomorph:



The most damning evidence as a sign of their engineered heritage is their uncanny ability to gestate from a variety of host organisms and the speed of their growth. They do not need to take more than a day or two to reach full adulthood. They are born knowing how to hunt, track and prepare their prey for implantation. We know for certain that they can develop in humans and the Predator species. We have also seen them gestate in dogs, creating functional if not attractive xenomorphs. Taking human and Predator DNA into account, that is three completely different species who are genetically compatible enough to produce viable offspring. In genetic terms, this would be highly unlikely, on the order of nearly impossible without an advanced technology making it possible. --Scifi.StackExchange > What purpose is acidic blood to a Xenomorph?



I believe in their native environment, wherever that is, they are all very similar or have a default genetic structure they attempt to return to if the conditions allow it. As a variety of aliens come to their world and use them in other environments, the new spawn may resemble less of their original genetic heritage but the potential for the original genes may always be there. Indeed, the creatures may possess the ability to reset their genetic structure as they adapt to a new environment and return to their previous physical shape, keeping the genes necessary for survival and only the external changes necessary for the environment.



Since we have also seen the Xenomorph take the characteristics of the creatures it hosts within (taking on the Predator characteristics for example in AVP and AVP: Requium) this implies an intelligence behind the design of the creature to build an organism able to gestate in a variety of organisms of different genetic structures, from different planets and to produce viable offspring of sufficient strength, speed, coordination, and intelligence to work cooperatively, telepathically (assuming a queen is available), or using a very fast other means of interacting that seems like telepathy and be able to quickly take over an area as effectively as these creatures do.




Dark Horse gives us a look at the creatures on a planet where there are two warring factions of the Xenomorphs, Aliens: Genocide, 1997, but one faction is red, the other classic black. We are not told if this is the homeworld or just another world long conquered by the species. All we can be sure of is they are not good at sharing a planet. Both groups tend to resemble what is considered the classic form of the creatures, as we have come to know them.


Aliens: Genocide, Dark Horse Comics, 1997


Aliens: Genocide, Dark Horse Comics, 1997


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.