Skip to main content

star wars - When do we see Gungans in The Force Awakens?


Screenshot from [“The Force Awakens”] Comic-Con video.


In this screenshot from The Force Awakens Comic-Con behind the scenes video, the red arrows point to what look like models/drawings of gungans, implying that there would be gungans appearing in the film.


enter image description here


However I don't remember seeing any. Were there any gungans in the film?




Note: I'm asking about any gungan, not just ... that gungan.



Answer



Update


Per the Creating Creatures featurette on the Blu-ray, we find out that these aliens were dubbed "snooty pirates" and definitely not Gungans. Here's a pic I took since I can't screencap it.



enter image description here




I would say that not only were Gungans not seen in The Force Awakens, but they should not have been expected to.


Based on (1) lack of evidence to the contrary, (2) my personal viewing of the film, and (3) my counter-points to the images in question.



  1. Jar Jar was the only Gungan character mentioned in pre-production, although as @Praxis's answer shows, that idea was scrapped before the behind-the-scenes video was released on YouTube. The studio scene could have been filmed before Jar Jar was axed (not in the way we hoped), so this point alone isn't enough.

  2. I did not see any Gungans while viewing the film, even though I was on the lookout for Darth Jar Jar or his cohorts. (I don't believe the theory, but I was hoping for a detail that'd spur more ridiculousness!)

  3. I would posit that the picture creatures were not meant to be Gungans at all. My analysis follows:


enter image description here



After looking at the updated question, with outlines, I see that I was looking at the negative space in a completely different way that the OP. So, I drew these overlays to help me see it their way.


enter image description here enter image description here


After doing this, I would hazard that the sketch on the right is meant to be the same species or character as the prop on the left.


I can't guess which other character in TFA this was. There were a few scenes with many alien species, such as on Jakku or at Maz's place, and images of them all aren't available to me, yet. I can provide a comparison of the character designs to Gungan designs.


enter image description here


As you can see above, snouted Gungans like Jar Jar have:



  • Eyes attached to short stalk-like anatomy, rising much above the skull line. The eyes on the drawing seem to match the ones on the prop, and neither have the stalk, ergo one probably wasn't added later

  • Wide, flat mouths that extend back up the snout, unlike the puckered orifice in the studio image

  • Visible nostril holes and ridges halfway up the snout (I can't spot anything like them in the studio pics)


  • A cranial ridge running from behind the eyes and down into the lips

  • A short, steep cranial slope, as opposed to the long, shallow one seen in the studio

  • No clear cheekbones, which are evident to me below the eye ridge on the left prop


Then there's the ears. Jar Jar's type of Gungan seems to sport different ones than his escort, so I'll account for both types:


The prop on the left currently has no ears long or large enough to be construed as Gungan ears, and the existing cap would likely interfere with attaching such ears to the model, unless it's easily removable. To me, they look like ears or a cloak for a different species, but I'm going to write this model off as too unclear.


The drawing on the right has what looks like large ears, but they fail to be Gungan because:



  • Unlike Jar Jar's or Tarpal's ear's, the primary outer ridge has no visible segmentation or ribbing. Some of these details could be lost, but I think the segmentation near the base of the ears would be noticeable, based on other visible details in the image.

  • Unlike the Gungan guard's "ears", they are not wide, loose, or resting on the shoulders. This type of Gungan's head appendage naturally rests in line with the center of the neck on the frontal plane. The drawing's rest behind the shoulders, but without any of the thick, floppiness we'd expect from this type of Gungan if they brushed it back.



One or two points of difference in a design comparison might not be enough to rule out Gungan design, given that there are several types of Gungans themselves. However, the difference between these behind-the-scenes designs and known Gungan designs are significant enough to rule them out as Gungans, unless we were going to be introduced to yet another variety. I think a new variety would be unlike, and, ahem, alienate the fan base.




The one on the right originally looked a bit like Boss Nass to me:


enter image description here enter image description here


So, I thought that's what the OP was referring to. I personally thought it looked much more like the big gentlemen we see in Maz Kanata's place, as pictured in the center of this image:


enter image description here


enter image description here enter image description here


If you look closely at the sketch, you can even see a thin cord coming from the top right (character's left) across his chest, which the tusked alien also has.


I no longer think the drawing is meant to be a fat-headed aliens, but wanted to preserve this part in case someone else saw the sketch without paintovers and saw the same thing as I did.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.