Skip to main content

harry potter - How were wands discovered?


Wands in the Harry Potter universe are instruments or tools which allow the bearer to channel and improve their magical abilities. Some wands even having an innate power.


Is there any reference as to:




  1. Where (optional)





  2. When (estimation accepted)




  3. Who




made this discovery?



Answer



I don't think there are any definite answers. I've drawn together what canon information I can find, and added my own speculation.


When?



Probably in the BC era, but it's not clear exactly when. The original wand probably bears little resemblance to the modern device, but the key aspects would be the same.


Ollivander’s


In Philosopher's Stone, when Harry visits Ollivander's shop, he learns that the family have been making wands since the 4th century BC:



The last shop was narrow and shabby. Peeling gold letters over the door read Ollivanders: Makers of Fine Wands since 382 BC. A single wand lay on a faded purple cushion in the dusty window.



It's likely that wands were in use before this date, and Pottermore backs this up:



The family of Ollivander has long been associated with the mysterious profession of wandcraft. It is said that the name means 'he who owns the olive wand', which suggests that the original Ollivander arrived in Britain from a Mediterranean country (olive trees not being native to the UK). Mr Ollivander himself believes that his earliest forebears in this country arrived with the Romans, and set up stall (subsequently shop) to sell to ancient British wizards whose wands were crude of construction and unreliable in performance.




However, the Roman conquest of Britain only began in AD 43, some four centuries after the Ollivander family opened shop. It's not clear how these timelines match up. Still, it puts an bound on the latest that wands could have been discovered and used.


There are suggestions in Pottermore than Ollivander invented the wand “as we know it today”



Prior to Mr Ollivander's proprietorship of the family business, wizards used a wide variety of wand cores. A customer would often present the wandmaker with a magical substance to which they were attached, or had inherited, or by which their family swore (hinted at by the core of Fleur Delacour's wand). Mr Ollivander, however, was a purist who insisted that the best wands would never be produced merely by encasing the whiskers of a favourite Kneazle (or the stalk of a Dittany plant that once saved a wizard's father from poisoning, or the mane of a kelpie a witch had once met on holiday in Scotland) in the customer's favourite wood.

The best wands, he believed, had cores of immensely powerful magical substances, which were expertly enclosed in specially selected and complementary wandwoods, the result to be matched to an owner with whom the wand itself felt the most affinity. While there was initially substantial resistance to this revolutionary way of crafting wands, it swiftly became clear that Ollivander wands were infinitely superior to anything that had come before. His methods of locating wand woods and core substances marrying them together and matching them to ideal owners are all jealously guarded secrets that were coveted by rival wandmakers.



However, this passage also makes it very clear that he wasn’t the first person to put a magical core in a piece of wood and use it to channel magic, so he didn’t invent the concept of the wand from scratch.


In an old page from her website, JKR explains how several characters have wand woods which match their birth wood from the Celtic calendar:



Some time after I had given Harry his holly-and-phoenix wand I came across a description of how the Celts had assigned trees to different parts of the year and discovered that, entirely by coincidence, I had assigned Harry the ‘correct’ wood for his day of birth. I therefore decided to give Ron and Hermione Celtic wand woods, too.




This may have been unintentional, but Malfoy is the same. The Celts were a dominant culture in the UK prior to the Roman conquests, so perhaps this lends credence to the idea that Ollivander arrived with the Romans, and he picked up this idea from the Celts. Or maybe it really just is coincidence.


Ancient Greece


But we can go back further. In a Comic Relief interview in 2001, JK Rowling said that "to do really good spells, you need a wand". Pottermore has at least one (alleged) instance of advanced magic that would pre-date the Ollivander shop:



Andros the Invincible. This Ancient Greek is alleged to be the only known wizard to have produced a Patronus the size of a giant.



The civilisation of Ancient Greece was over by the sixth century BC, at least a century before Ollivander opens. Assuming this report is accurate, and that you can't conjure a Patronus wandlessly, then this would be an earlier example of wand usage. (HP Wikia asserts that he mastered wandless spellcasting, but I can't find their source.)


Herpo the Foul is another ancient Greek wizard, responsible for creating the Basilisk, the Horcrux, and lots of other dark magic. We don't have dates for his activity, but this is another suggestion that wand-based or wand-like magic was around at the time of the Greeks.


Since we have Greeks performing relatively advanced wand-based magic, I'd guess the first wands were invented before even them (or at least before Herpo and Andros). There would have been some time between the invention of wands and this advanced magic.


The first explicit mention of wands



Ollivander aside, these examples only allude to the use of a wand, but none of them explicitly mention them. The earliest canon mention of a wand with a date that I can find comes from Quidditch through the Ages:



The famous painting Giinther der Gewalttlitige ist der Gewinner (Gunther the Violent Is the Winner), dated 1105, shows the ancient German game of Stichstock. […] The bladder-guardian was allowed to use his or her wand to repel these attacks.



There are illustrations (e.g. Rowena Ravenclaw on chocolate frog cards in video games) that depict people with wands at earlier dates, but I don't know if you would count those as canon. There are also mentions of spells, duelling and charms which presumably require wands, but it's never said explicitly.



Where?


Somewhere in Europe, maybe Greece?


The Pottermore page for Uagadou, the African school of magic, tells us that wands were a European invention.


Most canon instances of wizards and witches from the BC era hail from Ancient Greece. Since Greek philosophy and science was relatively advanced, and formed the basis of a lot of Western culture, perhaps the Greeks were the first to use wands. This could have been absorbed into the Roman Empire, then carried by Ollivander to Britain.



Ancient Egypt strikes me as another plausible candidate: they had curses (as evidenced by the need for Curse-Breakers like Bill Weasley; see Prisoner of Azkaban). But this is a throwaway line, so we can't place their wand usage, or lack thereof.


I don't know enough classical history to make plausible suggestions for other candidates (if there are any).



Who?


No idea.


Based on Ollivander's accounts above, it wasn't his ancestor who started the business. I also doubt it would be any of the named wizards above, as I think inventing wands (or being credited as such) trumps any other magical achievement.


As with most primitive inventions (fire, the wheel), the identity of the creator is probably lost to history. It's also plausible that multiple people invented it independently, and there is no one person responsible.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...