Skip to main content

star trek - Why was Tom Paris made chief helm officer?


This is an extension to this question about Tom Paris getting his rank.


Why was Tom Paris made the chief helm officer, was there no other, more senior helm officer on board? Or was every other helm officer dead? I know he was very good, but seniority is not always based on how good you are at something; let's face it Tom only had a field commission.



Answer



Here's the chain of events:





  1. Janeway offers to spring Paris out of a rehabilitation camp in exchange for his expertise in finding the Maquis and his knowledge of the Badlands. She commissions him as an observer, much to Paris's objections as "being the best pilot [Janeway] could ever have".




  2. Once aboard Voyager, Paris has no post on the bridge: Lt. Stadi is given the helm at the start of the Badlands mission.




  3. Voyager is thrown into the Delta Quadrant by the Caretaker array. Stadi is killed, as are dozens of other Voyager crew members. Paris survives.




  4. In the ensuing chaos, Paris moves to help secure the bridge and helm, taking the initiative to stand in for Stadi.





  5. The Caretaker beams the Voyager crew and the Maquis to the array in a simulation, with Paris acting as Janeway's muscle in the simulation and on the bridge during her standoff with Chakotay.




  6. Paris insists on joining Janeway to find Ensign Kim on the return away mission to the simulation.




  7. Aboard Voyager again, Paris is seen at the helm when Neelix is introduced, and for the rest of the episode.





  8. Paris joins Janeway on all subsequent away missions in "Caretaker", and winds up saving Chakotay's life in a hairy spot.




At the end of "Caretaker", Janeway grants him a (field) commission in the following exchange:



Janeway: Mr. Paris, you have a problem. I've invited Chakotay and the other Maquis to become part of this crew. It seemed the only reasonable thing to do under the circumstances.


Paris: Will you provide a bodyguard for me, Captain?


Janeway: It seems you already have one.


Paris: I do?



Janeway: Mr. Chakotay said something about his life belonging to you? He'll be taking responsibility for your safety.


Paris: I think I'm going to enjoy this.


Janeway: Don't be so sure: he'll also be my first officer. Everyone aboard this ship will report to him, including the lieutenant assigned to conn.


Paris: Me?


Janeway: I've entered into the ship's log on this date that I'm granting a field commission of lieutenant to Thomas Eugene Paris. Congratulations.


Paris: For the first time in my life, I don't know what to say.


Janeway: You've earned this, Tom.



So, the three factors that seemed to have given Paris his position were:




  • His established ability as a world-class pilot, possibly the best one on Voyager

  • The death of much of the Voyager crew, including the previously established conn officer, Lt. Stadi.

  • The earned trust of both Janeway and Chakotay during the Caretaker mission due to his initiative, ability to function under pressure, and loyalty


Given these factors (and the fact that Robert Duncan McNeill had a starring role, of course), Paris was the obvious choice.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...