Skip to main content

magic - When did Harry's Power Levels begin being acknowledged?


I've just re-read Summer Knight, and in it, there's a lot of mentions of how outmatched Harry always is. Now I'm listening to Dead Beat, which is the seventh book in the series, and it's talking about how he's in the top-10 for power, he just has no fine control.


Was there an actual switch where they started acknowledging that Harry's a bit of a powerful but imprecise magician, or did it just evolve during writing? And has this ever been discussed by Jim Butcher?


EDIT: To be clear, I'm aware that Harry was always this powerful, my question is at what point did the books start drawing your attention to it?



Answer



Harry Dresden has described himself as 'easily in the top 40, world-wide, for raw power'. What he lacks is precision, experience, and technique.



His power has never really 'spiked' without outside assistance. Rather, his technique and precision have improved and he has gained experience. He's gotten more powerful as well, but that is because magical ability grows as you exercise it.


He is actually very rarely outmatched. Of the foes he faces in his normal life, he's more than a match for them. The books, however, focus on the times when he's up against serious opposition. Harry throws down with vampires, werewolves, Fae, evil practitioners, etc. These are hardly your run-of-the-mill opponents.


For reference, let's consider a situation in Changes (book 12). I will attempt to keep this spoiler-light, since you likely haven't read it yet.


Harry's fairy Godmother, Lea, is outfitting him. She feels that, for the upcoming event, Harry must look the part. She magically changes his clothing at a whim, and layers the clothes with magical protection. Unlike his coat, this protection covers his whole body (even where the cloth itself doesn't) and can stop rifle rounds with no ill effect.


Harry is miffed - this spell far exceeds the protections he's built into his coat, and Lea has shown little or no effort in doing it. Then he asks how long it will last, remembering that his most recent tweak to his jacket's spell will last almost a year before being refreshed. Lea's spell will last less than 24 hours.


This should be taken as a perfect example of what I started off with: Lea is 2nd in power only to the Winter Queens. She is an immortal who has millennia of experience. Her technique has been refined for centuries or more, and her precision is exceptional. Her spell is outside of anything Harry could accomplish without a lot of time and effort...but he could do it.


To quote his brother, “He's Gandalf on crack and an IV of Red Bull, with a big leather coat and a .44 revolver in his pocket.” Even Gandalf, however, has Sauron and Balrogs. Harry meddles in things that are typically beyond mortal ken, mouths off to literal deities, and spits in the eye of monsters that would give the Faerie Queens pause. When you're going up against things that powerful, you ARE outclassed, even if you happen to be really strong.


Edit: I think I may have thought of the exact moment when the change happened. Spoilers for the end of Dead Beat:


It might, just MIGHT have been when Harry decided he had nothing better to do with his Saturday night than to




Raise a 65-million year old Tyrannosaurus Rex from the dead and ride it through downtown Chicago to save the Wardens, including his former night-terror-inducing boogeyman Morgan, from the Disciples of Kemmler (himself one of the more potent necromancers ever known). He even brought along his very own one-man polka band, to provide background music.



Or maybe it was when he realized that his actions, in addition to saving the Wardens, the city, and possibly the world from a necromantic death god, had compelled Morgan (who spent the first book hounding Harry unjustly, and still caused him the odd nightmare) to have to



wear said polka suit in public.



If you haven't read the books, I'm not joking about a single point. I swear, it makes perfect sense in context.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...