Skip to main content

Why didn't the Gryffindor Quidditch team have more senior players in Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone?


In "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone" most of the members of the Gryffindor Quidditch team were in the first 3 years and no one from 4th, 6th and 7th years. Harry (1st), Katie (2nd), Alicia (3rd), Angelina (3rd), Fred (3rd), George (3rd), Wood (5th)


While in "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix", all the players were from the last 3 years. Harry (5th), Katie (6th), Alicia (7th), Angelina (7th), Fred (7th), George (7th), Ron (5th)


Was it because the story is centred on Harry Potter, so the guys near to his year were bound to be in the team, or is there any other explanation?



Answer




The out-of-universe explanation is that, yes, having the same batch of players in the team throughout Harry's first few years gives consistency and stability. We aren't being constantly introduced to new characters unnecessarily.


From an in-universe point-of-view, there are three principles of Gryffindor's team selection to bear in mind.





  • Team members were appointed on merit, regardless of age.



    "At least no one on the Gryffindor team had to buy their way in," said Hermione sharply. "They got in on pure talent."
    (Chamber of Secrets, Chapter 7, Mudbloods and Murmurs).





  • Younger players from lower years are certainly not unheard of.



    Remember that Malfoy managed to get into the Slytherin team in his second year (albeit using bribery). When Harry came to picking his own team, he showed that he wasn't averse to picking players from lower years.



    Neither of his chosen Beaters had the old brilliance of Fred and George, but he was still reasonably pleased with them: Jimmy Peakes, a short but broad-chested third-year who had managed to raise a lump the size of an egg on the back of Harry's head with a ferociously hit Bludger, and Richie Coote, who looked weedy but aimed well.
    (Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 11, Hermione's Helping Hand).





  • First-years never play in the teams, apart from Harry.



    "Seeker?" he said. "But first-years never - you must be the youngest house player in about -"

    "- a century," said Harry, shovelling pie into his mouth. He felt particularly hungry after the excitement of the afternoon. "Wood told me."
    (Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 9, The Midnight Duel).





The most likely explanation for Gryffindor's young team in Philosopher's Stone was that a spate of players had left within the previous year. It might be helpful to lay out all the known Gryffindor Quidditch players over the six years that Harry is at Hogwarts, with the year each player was in when they joined the team:


Permanent players:


Oliver Wood (Keeper, 5th year in PS)
Alicia Spinnet (Chaser, 3rd year in PS)
Angelina Johnson (Chaser, 3rd year in PS)

Katie Bell (Chaser, 2nd year in PS)
Fred Weasley (Beater, 3rd year in PS)
George Weasley (Beater, 3rd year in PS)
Harry Potter (Seeker, 1st year in PS)


Ron Weasley (Keeper, 5th year in OotP)


Demelza Robins (Chaser, year unknown in HBP)
Ginny Weasley (Chaser, 5th year in HBP)
Jimmy Peakes (Beater, 3rd year in HBP)
Ritchie Coote (Beater, year unknown in HBP)


Temporary players:



Unknown player (Seeker, year unknown in PS)


Ginny Weasley (Seeker, 4th year in OotP)
Jack Sloper (Beater, year unknown in OotP)
Andrew Kirke (Beater, year unknown in OotP)


Dean Thomas (Chaser, 6th year in HBP)
Cormac McLaggen (Keeper, 7th year in HBP)


We can tell which year people are in based on when they leave Hogwarts, or if it's directly mentioned in the books (in the case of people like Peakes). I've seen some sources online which say that Robins was in her fourth year but I haven't seen any evidence for this from the books.


Anyway, it's plain enough that Gryffindor kept the same team together throughout Harry's first four years. Nobody was replaced because nobody had left. Even in his fifth year, the only player that needed to be replaced was Wood. However, during Half-Blood Prince a total of four players had left or graduated, meaning that wholesale replacements were needed.


The same sort of situation seems to have arose either during Philosopher's Stone or, more likely, the year before. Spinnet, Johnson and the Weasley twins were all in the same year but seemed to be fairly well bedded in during PS. They seemingly all knew one another well having played together the previous year as a bunch of second-years. We know that Spinnet wasn't in the first-team that year but did feature as a reserve (which may well include training with the team and so on):




"And she's really belting along up there, a neat pass to Alicia Spinnet, a good find of Oliver Wood's, last year only a reserve - back to Johnston...
(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 11, Quidditch).



We know that the Weasley twins at least had already been in the team for a year.



"We know Oliver's speech by heart," Fred told Harry. "We were in the team last year."
(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 11, Quidditch).



It's debatable who Fred is talking about here. By "we" he could mean just him and George. Or he could be referring to Angelina as well. Either way, I think it's likely (if not proveable) that all of them were in the team.


The next year (Harry's first) Wood had three places to fill: two Chaser slots and the Seeker. (We know that Charlie Weasley was the old Seeker and had left Hogwarts the previous year). Wood appointed Katie Bell, a second-year, as a new Chaser at the Quidditch trials at the start of PS, which as readers we never get to see. Alicia Spinnet was promoted from the reserves. As NKCampbell demonstrates, he had already appointed Harry, a first-year, prior to the trials taking place. It's clear that he wasn't planning on picking anyone that young but did so on McGonagall's personal recommendation.



So it was partly by chance that Wood ended up with such a young team. Indeed, he was probably the only player who'd played more than one full season come the start of Philosopher's Stone. However, he appointed the majority of his team from trials and happened to pick second-year students in each case.


There are a variety of reasons why Wood may have picked a younger team, some of which are laid out on this Reddit thread:




  • It may have been that, coincidentally, the best players just happened to be the younger ones.




  • It could be that older players didn't want to apply, to focus on studying, because they were part of other clubs or for some other reason.





  • Wood may have judged that picking young players would allow the team to bond together over time. By gradually getting to know one another's strengths and weaknesses, the players would be better able to play as an effective unit. This proves to be a shrewd move as, after playing together for three years, the Gryffindor team is a force to be reckoned with in Prisoner of Azkaban.




  • Wood may have felt intimidated by older students. He was the captain but he was only in his fifth year. He may have felt that it would be easier to manage players who were younger than himself.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

tolkiens legendarium - Did Gandalf wear his Ring of Power throughout the trilogy?

After Gandalf discovered that Sauron was back and sent Frodo on his quest to Rivendell, did he continue to wear Narya (one of the Three Rings)? It seems like a huge risk to continue to wear it after the Nazgûl (Ringwraiths) started to try and reclaim the One Ring; if they managed to get the ring to Sauron, couldn't he be corrupted by his power? Whatever powers Narya bestows upon him couldn't possibly be worth the huge risk, could it? Answer When Sauron forged the one ring and put it on his finger, the other ring bearers were immediately aware of him and his intentions and removed their own rings. There is no reason why they couldn't merely do so again. As soon as Sauron set the One Ring upon his finger they were aware of him; and they knew him, and preceived that he would be master of them, and of all they wrought. Then in anger and fear they took off their rings. "Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age," Silmarillion