Skip to main content

game of thrones - Why isn't Daenerys contacted by more disgruntled nobles?


After Robert's Rebellion, a lot of nobles were probably unhappy with the outcome. Also, right now (= Season 3 and onwards), even more nobles are unhappy with the current outcome of the war of the 5 kings. Some of them might have been Targaryen loyalists already, and some are now considering becoming such.


A few people do get in touch with Daenerys:




Varys (well, sort of), Barristan Selmy, Tyrion Lannister.



But could that really be it? Nobody else is even offering her to conspire together against the bastard Lannister kings? Or even to otherwise establish some sort of relations with her?


This is especially puzzling at the point when Daenerys has a reasonable-size army (Second Sons + thousands of unsullied) and rules over between 1 and 3 cities, depending on the weather.



Answer



Since we don't yet know if any of the events/plots in System Down's book spoiler exist in the TV show world, here's a show-only answer.




Short answer: actively joining them is incredibly risky. Not just for the individual(s) making an epic journey to negotiate with an unknown, unpredictable queen - it also risks marking your entire family as traitors.


At no point in the show has it looked like there is a credible, active Targaryen counter rebellion with a strong chance of taking the throne worth overtly risking everything like that for - the closest are, a terrifyingly unpredictable dothraki horde, and an impressive army perplexingly marching the wrong way.



So, the loyalists quietly keep their heads down for now - the only exceptions are exiles and fugitives with nothing to lose.




Long answer: There were Targaryen loyalists. King Robert was worried that they might join a credible counter-rebellion:



If the Targaryen boy crosses with a Dothraki horde at his back, the scum will join him!



Robert was well aware that many of those who surrendered to him were reluctant and were potential traitors, and he took this risk seriously. Any pro-Targaryen action would be a huge risk - you'd mark yourself a traitor and a danger to the most powerful houses, and we see what happens to families who mark themselves to be enemies of the powerful...


To take that sort of risk, you'd need some kind of inspiring leader who fills you with hope that they have a real chance of winning and that even if they fail, it's such a noble glorious cause that it's worth risking everything for.


For the decade and a half or so between the start of the show and the rebellion, that "inspiring leader", traveling the free cities trying to rally support, was this guy:


enter image description here



Feel inspired yet? No, nor did they. Viserys ends up desperate enough to resort to trying to piggyback on the back of the Dothraki as the khalessi's brother.


When he dies, the Targaryen loyalists have another problem. The person they would now be risking everything to support might now be less uninspiring, but much more terrifying and unpredictable. He's probably not what they had in mind when they said they wanted a new king:


enter image description here


Robert might have been right that the loyalists might join a Dothraki/Targaryen army if it landed on their side of the sea. But before then? Far too risky and unpredictable. The only man who does is Jorah, an exile with nothing to lose (and a spy hoping to earn a ticket home).


Then Drogo dies, the khalasar scatters, and it looks like it's all over.


By the time anyone in Westeros knows Dany has, against all the odds, become a credible power in her own right, she's the wrong side of the world, landed her ships, baffling any would-be supporters by going the wrong way. Does she even want to rule Westeros? They have no reason to be sure that she does.


enter image description here


She's too far to easily get in contact with - you'd have to send a valuable trusted envoy on a dangerous journey, risking losing them or giving away your intentions. There's a storyline(s) in the books that appears to have been dropped from the show that makes explicit just how difficult, dangerous and risky this is for both the envoys (risking their lives on seas and roads where slavers are not the only danger), and the family who sent them (risking being discovered and knowing there's a risk this unknown, unpredictable queen might reject them).


Yet, people do spontaneously join her, uninvited. Who are they, and what do they have in common?




  • Jorah was an exile with nothing to lose

  • Barristan is effectively an exile with nothing to lose, having fallen out of favour with, then overtly opposed, the most powerful family

  • Tyrion is a fugitive with nothing to lose, with a bounty on his head


All those other loyalists and their families have too much to lose to stick their necks out.


But are they secretly plotting, or preparing themselves for a credible counter-rebellion? We'll have to wait and see...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

harry potter - How could Expelliarmus beat Avada Kedavra?

I want to be very careful about how I ask this question – I am not asking How did Voldemort die? [CLOSED] Below the text is the relevant passages from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows if anyone wants to review them (I'm sorry for the amount of text). How did Expelliarmus beat Avada Kedavra and kill Voldemort? I feel the reason Harry's Expelliarmus overpowered Voldemort's Avada Kedavra curse has to do with who was master of the Elder Wand and how the Elder Wand works. I've always had trouble understanding fully how the Elder Wand works, though. How much did the fact that Voldemort never truly won or mastered the Elder Wand factor into how Expelliarmus reacted to Avada Kedavra and caused Avada Kedavra to rebound and kill Voldemort? An answer based in book canon would be especially welcome, but any canon source really is fine. Harry heard the high voice shriek as he, too, yelled his best hope to the heavens, pointing Draco’s wand: ‘ Avada Kedavra !’ ‘ Expelliarmus !...

game of thrones - Is Syrio Forel dead?

In the episode 'The Pointy End' (Season 1 Episode 8) when Arya runs from the Lannister guards you hear the sound of a sword being dropped (around 4:56): [embedded content] After that neither Syrio or Ser Meryn Trant is never mentioned or seen in the show again, except when Arya mentions to the Hound that Ser Meryn Trant killed Syrio. Is there any mention in the books that Syrio actually dies?

tolkiens legendarium - Difference between elves and dwarves blacksmithing in the Lord of the Rings

Both the elves and the dwarves were famous for their metal work in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, but what is the difference between what they made, and which one had the better skill of making amours and swords? Answer James Christopher's answer sums up the second part of your question well, but as to the difference in what they made, a little more detail is needed. Once the Elves learned to forge with steel, the shape of the sword changed, now being able to take on the form of a great broadsword or a light and agile curved sword. Additionally, they took great pride in decorating their swords. As we see in the Lord of the Rings , some swords like Sting had magical properties such as glowing blue when orcs are near. As far as the use of Mithril, lotr.wikia has two contradictory passages: Thus, Elven blades became renowned as great weapons, capable of performing deeds beyond the skill of their handlers and were even more glorious when the use of Mithril was allowed to the Elves. ...