Skip to main content

Why doesn't Voyager in Star Trek go above the galactic plane to get back home?


Related to Why do Star Trek vessels always approach each other on parallel planes?, but on a larger scale.


The premise of Star Trek: Voyager is that the ship Voyager is stranded from Earth on the exact opposite side of the Milky Way. The series moves forward as they move around the disc of the galaxy in a rough semicircle.


Why couldn't they simply point Voyager to Earth and go over/under the center of the galaxy? Wouldn't they then be able to use our supermassive black hole to slingshot them there and shorten the journey?



Answer



No. They couldn't simply point Voyager toward Earth and go over or under the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. Our galaxy, while lacking the usual galactic bulge common to spiral galaxies, it has instead, a highly radioactive region due to a galactic collision in the distant past. This bar-like region would make any path through the core of the galaxy very dangerous.


Milky Way Galaxy Quadrant Map


Voyager's flight plan was as direct a path as they could take. The black hole at the center of our galaxy is surrounded by a dense cloud of stars bound very close together by gravity and stellar dust which would make any form of slingshot maneuver unlikely or even impossible due to gravitational fluctuations, highly intense radiation fields, interstellar dust and the increased density of stellar matter.


Federation Cosmology 101





  • Despite images which portray our galaxy as having pockets of empty space by which ships can maneuver, in fact, nothing could be further from the truth. Even the regions which appear dark can be filled with dust particles and other barely-visible bodies. At faster than light speeds, even dust can take its toll on a starship unless that ship is able to push the dust away keeping the flight path clear.




  • On most ships of the Alpha Quadrant, the technology performing that service is the deflector array. The deflector sweeps space ahead of the ship clear of all matter. Without such an array, faster than light travel would require VERY durable ships, since even tiny particles would strike with multi-megaton force.




  • While the galaxy averages only a 1000 light-year thickness in any place outside of the galactic hub, there are still plenty of stars and in particular global clusters outside of the galaxy proper. These would still have to be navigated since star density drops with radius from the galaxy proper.





Sagittarius A and the center of the galaxy


There are several reasons ships would be loathe to approach the galactic hub.




  • The most prominent would be that the Galactic Center is marked by an intense radio source named Sagittarius A. The motion of material around the center indicates that Sagittarius A* harbors a massive, compact object. This concentration of mass is best explained as a supermassive black hole with an estimated mass of 4.1–4.5 million times the mass of the Sun.




  • While our galaxy has less of a galactic hub than most like it, the core is surrounded by a dense field of red dwarf stars, possibly from collision with another galaxy in the distant past. The closer you get to the center of the galaxy, the greater the density of both stellar dust and stellar bodies. Multiple stars can be found within distances of far less than a light year. Gamma-ray radiation levels are significantly higher in this region. The reason is, as yet, unknown.





enter image description here



  • Even if Voyager wanted to take the risk and try to use the galactic core as a gravitation slingshot mechanism, the stellar density and erratic movement of stars, would make it VERY dangerous. The density of matter in those regions would more than likely overwhelm the deflector array also making it a suicide run.


enter image description here


More mundane reasons for the scenic route




  • Voyager is a small ship. It needs to resupply fairly regularly to keep its crew alive and in decent health. The path they took gave them both an opportunity for exploration and a chance to interact with other species which could both give them opportunities for resupply and potential chances to interact with species with greater technologies which might shorten their journey.





  • In addition to food and biomatter supplies to maintain the ship, they would require dilithium, a material which is "porous" to antimatter and thus powers a warp core, and reactor materials for the impulse engines. None of these would be easily available above the galactic plane, since the opportunities for meeting civilizations might decrease significantly there.




  • Stellar formations called globular clusters would be the only dense star formations above or below the galactic plane and would be less likely to have the resources needed for a starship since most of those stars are long-lived, slow burning, red dwarfs, which do not support the supernova activity necessary to create heavier elemental materials needed by Alpha Quadrant vehicles or to support Life As We Know It.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.