Skip to main content

star wars - How were Anakin, Obi-Wan, and Palpatine physically trapped by a ray shield?


In Revenge of the Sith, Anakin, Obi-Wan, and Palpatine are trapped by a ray shield on the Separatist ship the Invisible Hand:


enter image description here


It is specifically called it a "ray shield" by multiple characters:




60 INT. BRIDGE-TRADE FEDERATION CRUISER


BODYGUARD: General, we found the Jedi. They're in hallway 328.


GENERAL GRIEVOUS: Activate ray shields.


61 INT. HALLWAY-TRADE FEDERATION CRUISER


They run down the hallway. Suddenly, ray shields drop around them, putting them in an electronic box in the middle of the hallway.


ANAKIN: Ray shields!



However, ray shields are (usually) only capable of stopping energy like blaster bolts. To physically block an object you need a particle shield.


The fact that ray shields do not block physical objects is supported by the (fully canon) Star Wars: The Clone Wars episode "Landing at Point Rain", in which Anakin was seeing running through a ray shield along with clone troopers1:


enter image description here



This shield is described as a ray shield in the episode description:



...On Geonosis, Separatist leader Poggle the Lesser, safe in his newly ray-shielded factories, creates thousands of terrible new weapons which march off the assembly line against the outnumbered clone army...



Ray shields' inability to block physical objects is also supported as a major plot point in A New Hope during the Battle of Yavin briefing:



DODONNA: The target area is only two meters wide. It's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system. A precise hit will start a chain reaction which should destroy the station. Only a precise hit will set up a chain reaction. The shaft is ray-shielded, so you'll have to use proton torpedoes.



The Rebels needed to use proton torpedoes (as opposed to, say, the X-Wing's four blaster cannons) because proton torpedoes are physical objects:


enter image description here



MG7-A proton torpedo


Hence, the Death Star was only destroyed because its ray shielded thermal exhaust port was vulnerable to physical proton torpedoes.


How were Anakin, Obi-Wan, and Palpatine physically impeded by the Separatist ray shield when the plot in two other canon sources depended on ray shields' inability to block physical objects (including humans)?


Note that this question is not tagged with -- I have provisionally accepted the Legends answer, but I am still looking for a canon answer.




1 GIF taken from 15:44 of this Youtube video.



Answer



Okay so I did some googling and this is what I came up with from the starwars.wikia.com on deflector shields themselves not either of the 'sub-shields'.



Ray shields were also used as capture devices onboard capital ships; Obi-Wan Kenobi, Anakin Skywalker and Supreme Chancellor Palpatine were caught in a ray shield trap onboard Invisible Hand. Although designed to counter energy attacks, the energy given off by the ray shield would likely have disintegrated the Jedi duo had they attempted to pass through it.




Which fits in the behavior we have observed in the movies (obviously). Like I stated in my comment, in the original 3 movies the only definition given to a ray shields functionality is that it can be broken by proton torpedoes. That's it. So any behavior we see applied to them in later movies that doesn't directly contradict the "can be broken with proton torpedoes" rule we have to accept as acceptable behavior. Because that's what cannon is saying it can do.


To go along with this (this was the best clip I could find)





we can clearly see that they don't try to touch it and tend to not move much at all. Which seems to support the line "would likely have disintegrated them."

After reading here, here and following and reading a bunch of links from this page, and links on this page I've come up with this LEGENDS answer.


Ray/Energy shields are meant to deflect energy from blaster bolts. They are different from Particle shields in that they always allow physical objects to pass through them. However the radiation/electrostatic energy coming off a ray shield can be anywhere from annoying to deadly for organic matter.


Also the strength of a ray shield seems to be in "how much energy can I absorb before my circuits overload" not "how strong is the field I project". This is what made ray-shields useful as capture devices. They can be used anywhere without worry of suffocating your captured victim (which a particle shield would do as it inhibits all particles from crossing it's barrier), and still act as effective movement inhibitors because a strongly projected ray shield would be deadly to organic captives.



This leads to the following 2 scenarios pictured in the question. A weakly projected large shield on Geonosis capable of absorbing lots of energy but also capable of allowing clones/Geonosians to pass through it. And a much smaller but much more strongly projected capture field on the capital ship which would have allowed the Jedi/chancellor to pass but would have killed them in the process.


Out of universe I'll go back to my first comment:


Hand wavium forgetism... Basically it had been such a long time between the 2 movies that they forgot they had used the term "ray shield" and given it X definition. Alternatively, attention spans had shrunk drastically between the 2 movies so they decided "ray shield" worked better then "particle shield" because who doesn't like rays? and it takes less time to say.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir

the lord of the rings - Why is Gimli allowed to travel to Valinor?

Gimli was allowed to go to Valinor despite not being a ring bearer. Is this explained in detail or just with the one line "for his love for Galadriel"? Answer There's not much detail about this aside from what's said in Appendix A to Return of the King: We have heard tell that Legolas took Gimli Glóin's son with him because of their great friendship, greater than any that has been between Elf and Dwarf. If this is true, then it is strange indeed: that a Dwarf should be willing to leave Middle-earth for any love, or that the Eldar should receive him, or that the Lords of the West should permit it. But it is said that Gimli went also out of desire to see again the beauty of Galadriel; and it may be that she, being mighty among the Eldar, obtained this grace for him. More cannot be said of this matter. And Appendix B: Then Legolas built a grey ship in Ithilien, and sailed down Anduin and so over Sea; and with him, it is said, went Gimli the Dwarf . And when that sh

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed.