Skip to main content

doctor who - The Cracks in the Universe: Why are they lethal to some, but not to others?


During the Doctor Who Season 5 story arc, the cracks in the universe absorb a number of creatures, erasing them completely from time:



However, there are 5 characters/species that are able to be close to the cracks, in some cases for long periods of time, without getting erased from time:



  • Amy Pond, who had a crack in her room for years but never got absorbed by it, even though her parents did.


  • The Doctor, who reached into a crack to pull out a piece of the exploding TARDIS in "Cold Blood".

  • Prisoner Zero, who was able to escape prison by fleeing into Amy's house through the crack in her wall.

  • An Atraxi, who was peering at the Doctor and Amy through the crack in her wall in "The Eleventh Hour".

  • The Saturnynians, who fled their damaged world for Earth through a crack in "The Vampires of Venice".


Are there any potential in-universe explanations for why the cracks in the universe are not lethal to these few characters?



Answer



The answer from abcooper makes a very good point that didn't dawn on me: that the cracks can separately exhibit spatial or temporal properties. It then reminded me of something Angel Bob said in the episode "Flesh and Stone":



There is a rupture in time. The Angels calculate that if you throw yourself into it, it will close and they will be saved.




This led me to a potential in-universe explanation:



  • When a crack first appears, it connects that point in time and space directly to the time explosion that is destroying the universe. It behaves more like a temporal rift, absorbing objects around it and erasing them from time.

  • Upon absorbing enough, the crack is disconnected from the time explosion, connecting to a different point in space (and possibly time). It behaves more like a spatial rift, allowing individuals to pass through unharmed.


The initial appearance of a crack as a temporal rift which then transitions to a spatial rift helps explain some of the apparent discrepancies:



  • Being an exceedingly complicated space/time event (and a Lord of Time) makes the Doctor able to get near an "active" temporal rift for at least a short period of time without being absorbed by it, allowing him to reach into one in "Cold Blood", suffering some pain in the process. However, he is absorbed and erased from time when he ultimately plunges himself directly into the time explosion in "The Big Bang".

  • When the crack first appeared in Amy's home, it absorbed her parents (and maybe other things) then went "dormant", transitioning to a spatial rift. This allowed Amy to remain near it without being erased from time, although small amounts of residual time energy may have been leaking through that affected her. Later, Prisoner Zero was able to escape through the crack, and the Doctor was able to force it open to communicate with the Atraxi on the other side.


  • The crack that appears in the Byzantium seems much more powerful, requiring that it absorb more "complicated space/time events" to close it. After absorbing some soldiers and all of the Weeping Angels it transitions to a dormant state.


  • In "The Vampires of Venice", the Saturnynian Rosanna Calvierri says:



    There were cracks. Some were tiny... some were as big as the sky. Through some we saw worlds and people and through others we saw silence... and the end of all things. We fled to an ocean like ours and the crack snapped shut behind us... and Saturnyne was lost.



    The cracks that appeared presumably absorbed and destroyed much of the planet, transitioning to spatial rifts which allowed a small group to flee through them to Earth.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...
Post a Comment
Read more

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more