Skip to main content

marvel - Is the War Machine armour simply "the Iron Man armour with big guns"?


What are the differences between Iron Man and War Machine armours ?


In the movies, it seems that they are the same, except the War Machine armour features more heavy weapons. But if they are the same, why wouldn't Tony Stark use the War Machine armour?


Do they have different characteristics (like strength, resistance, flight time...)?


I am looking for answers from the movies and/or the comics.



Answer



I updated my answer thanks to the comment from @Ben. I didn't know about the official tie-in comics that reveal a bit more information about the suits. My old answer was from on-screen info only.



All in all we have seen three War Machine suits so far in the cinematic universe.




  1. Mark I (Iron Man 2)

  2. Mark II/Iron Patriot (After Iron Man 3 up to Civil War)

  3. Mark III (Civil War)


War Machine MK I


The first War Machine is actually the Iron Man Suit MK II.
So in a sense they are identical. We can clearly see this in Iron Man 2 when Rhodey goes into the garage to don a suit. We see the rebuild MK I and MK II & III from the first movie in the "gallery". Rhodey then dons the unpainted MK II to fight Tony. After the fight he takes the suit with him and it's retrofitted with weapons by Hammer, turning it into War Machine.


The MK II is a prototype suit however. The first one Tony built after he returned home and the one he used for flight testing. Aside from the repulsors it lacks all of the advanced weapons Tony used in the MK III and IV suits. It also still had the icing problem(1), keeping it from reaching high altitudes.


War Machine MK II



After the events of Iron Man 2, Tony took the MK II armor back from Rhodey. He undid all the changes made by Hammer which explains why the armor is seen again in his garage in Iron Man 3. Instead he gave Rhodey a new suit, the War Machine MK II, which was also briefly known as Iron Patriot.
This suit contains the essential improvements Tony made up to this point. It was also specifically designed for combat. In this suit most of the weapons are concealed, just like in the Iron Man suits. One exception is the trademark shoulder gun.


War Machine MK III


The MK III is an upgraded suit that Rhodes uses after he becomes an Avenger and that he uses during Civil War. It mainly features some weapon upgrades like a melee weapon and a sonic cannon.



One major difference between the War Machine and Iron Man suits seems to be the AI support. As far as I can recall War Machine is never shown getting any sort of AI feedback. The suit is also never shown to act autonomously, like the Iron Man suits can in later generations. You really have to wonder how he controls the suits many functions without help. Tony always looks like he could hardly get anything done without the help of Jarvis or Friday.


As for the weapons, while War Machine features the more obvious weapons like the shoulder gun, Iron Man actually has the more advanced arsenal, including his powerful laser and several guided weapons systems.
Even the updated War Machine MK II and III armors are not more powerful than their Iron Man counterparts, even though they feature updated repulsors and similar miniaturized weapons.


So there is really no reason for Tony to use War Machine instead of Iron Man. The War Machine suits are basically just modified snapshots of Tony's progress with his own suits. He did after all create more than 40 suits with various specializations and improvements that suit his own style much better than War Machine.


1: According to the Wiki, I don't think this was somehow confirmed onscreen.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more