Skip to main content

marvel - Is the War Machine armour simply "the Iron Man armour with big guns"?


What are the differences between Iron Man and War Machine armours ?


In the movies, it seems that they are the same, except the War Machine armour features more heavy weapons. But if they are the same, why wouldn't Tony Stark use the War Machine armour?


Do they have different characteristics (like strength, resistance, flight time...)?


I am looking for answers from the movies and/or the comics.



Answer



I updated my answer thanks to the comment from @Ben. I didn't know about the official tie-in comics that reveal a bit more information about the suits. My old answer was from on-screen info only.




All in all we have seen three War Machine suits so far in the cinematic universe.




  1. Mark I (Iron Man 2)

  2. Mark II/Iron Patriot (After Iron Man 3 up to Civil War)

  3. Mark III (Civil War)


War Machine MK I


The first War Machine is actually the Iron Man Suit MK II.
So in a sense they are identical. We can clearly see this in Iron Man 2 when Rhodey goes into the garage to don a suit. We see the rebuild MK I and MK II & III from the first movie in the "gallery". Rhodey then dons the unpainted MK II to fight Tony. After the fight he takes the suit with him and it's retrofitted with weapons by Hammer, turning it into War Machine.


The MK II is a prototype suit however. The first one Tony built after he returned home and the one he used for flight testing. Aside from the repulsors it lacks all of the advanced weapons Tony used in the MK III and IV suits. It also still had the icing problem(1), keeping it from reaching high altitudes.


War Machine MK II



After the events of Iron Man 2, Tony took the MK II armor back from Rhodey. He undid all the changes made by Hammer which explains why the armor is seen again in his garage in Iron Man 3. Instead he gave Rhodey a new suit, the War Machine MK II, which was also briefly known as Iron Patriot.
This suit contains the essential improvements Tony made up to this point. It was also specifically designed for combat. In this suit most of the weapons are concealed, just like in the Iron Man suits. One exception is the trademark shoulder gun.


War Machine MK III


The MK III is an upgraded suit that Rhodes uses after he becomes an Avenger and that he uses during Civil War. It mainly features some weapon upgrades like a melee weapon and a sonic cannon.




One major difference between the War Machine and Iron Man suits seems to be the AI support. As far as I can recall War Machine is never shown getting any sort of AI feedback. The suit is also never shown to act autonomously, like the Iron Man suits can in later generations. You really have to wonder how he controls the suits many functions without help. Tony always looks like he could hardly get anything done without the help of Jarvis or Friday.


As for the weapons, while War Machine features the more obvious weapons like the shoulder gun, Iron Man actually has the more advanced arsenal, including his powerful laser and several guided weapons systems.
Even the updated War Machine MK II and III armors are not more powerful than their Iron Man counterparts, even though they feature updated repulsors and similar miniaturized weapons.


So there is really no reason for Tony to use War Machine instead of Iron Man. The War Machine suits are basically just modified snapshots of Tony's progress with his own suits. He did after all create more than 40 suits with various specializations and improvements that suit his own style much better than War Machine.


1: According to the Wiki, I don't think this was somehow confirmed onscreen.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did the gatekeeper and the keymaster get intimate in Ghostbusters?

According to TVTropes ( usual warning, don't follow the link or you'll waste half your life in a twisty maze of content ): In Ghostbusters, it's strongly implied that Dana Barret, while possessed by Zuul the Gatekeeper, had sex with Louis Tully, who was possessed by Vinz Clortho the Keymaster (key, gate, get it?), in order to free Big Bad Gozer. In fact, a deleted scene from the movie has Venkman explicitly asking Dana if she and Louis "did it". I turned the quote into a spoiler since it contains really poor-taste joke, but the gist of it is that it's implied that as part of freeing Gozer , the two characters possessed by the Keymaster and the Gatekeeper had sex. Is there any canon confirmation or denial of this theory (canon meaning something from creators' interviews, DVD commentary, script, delete scenes etc...)? Answer The Richard Mueller novelisation and both versions of the script strongly suggest that they didn't have sex (or at the very l...

Why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize Missy right away?

So after it was established that Missy is actually both the Master, and the "woman in the shop" who gave Clara the TARDIS number... ...why didn't The Doctor or Clara recognize her right away? I remember the Tenth Doctor in The Sound of Drums stating that Timelords had a way of recognizing other Timelords no matter if they had regenerated. And Clara should have recognized her as well... I'm hoping for a better explanation than "Moffat screwed up", and that I actually missed something after two watchthroughs of the episode. Answer There seems to be a lot of in-canon uncertainty as to the extent to which Time Lords can recognise one another which far pre-dates Moffat's tenure. From the Time Lords page on Wikipedia : Whether or not Time Lords can recognise each other across regenerations is not made entirely clear: In The War Games, the War Chief recognises the Second Doctor despite his regeneration and it is implied that the Doctor knows him when they fir...

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

warhammer40k - What evidence supposedly supports Tau as related to the Necrontyr?

I've heard of rumours saying that the Tau from Warhammer 40K are in fact the Necrontyr. Is there anything that supports this statement, in WH40K canon? I just found this, on 1d4 chan 1 : Helping Necrons? Or are they Necrontyr descendants? An often overlooked issue is that Tau have no warp signatures, just like Necrons, hate Warpspawns and Warp in general, just like Necrons, have the exact same skull shape,stature and short lives, and the overwhelming need for Technology and beam weapons, JUST LIKE NECRONS. GW may have planned a race that simply prepares a pacified, multiracial galaxy for Necrons to feast upon, supported by Ethereals that have a C'tan phase blade. Then there is a reference of "dark seed in east" by the Deceiver, so the tricky C'tan might give Tzeentch the finger in the JUST AS PLANNED competition. Or maybe GW just has so little creativity that they simply made a new civ conforming to an Old One's standards without knowing it. Is this the connec...