Skip to main content

harry potter - Why didn't Quirrell try to kill Ron and Hermione?


Quirrell attempts to assassinate Harry during the Quidditch match in Philospher's Stone.



"But Snape tried to kill me!"

"No, no, no. I tried to kill you. Your friend Miss Granger accidentally knocked me over as she rushed to set fire to Snape at that Quidditch match. She broke my eye contact with you. Another few seconds and I'd have got you off that broom. I'd have managed it before then if Snape hadn't been muttering a counter-curse, trying to save you."
"Snape was trying to save me?"
"Of course," said Quirrell coolly. "Why do you think he wanted to referee your next match? He was trying to make sure I didn't do it again. Funny, really...he needn't have bothered. I couldn't do anything with Dumbledore watching. All the other teachers thought Snape was trying to stop Gryffindor winning, he did make himself unpopular...and what a waste of time, when after all that, I'm going to kill you tonight."
Quirrell snapped his fingers. Ropes sprang out of thin air and wrapped themselves tightly around Harry.
"You're too nosy to live, Potter. Scurrying around the school at Hallowe'en like that, for all I knew you'd seen me coming to look at what was guarding the Stone."
(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 17, The Man with Two Faces).



Quirrell's stated chain of logic is that:



  • Harry had been scurrying around the school at Halloween.


  • This made Quirrell think that Harry may have realised that Quirrell wanted the Stone.

  • Quirrell concluded that Harry was "too nosy to live".

  • Quirrell tried to kill Harry during the Quidditch match.


Yet why was Harry singled out for murdering? If Harry was too nosy to live then surely Ron and Hermione were too? The event which sparked off Quirrell's attempted assassination was Harry being out his dormitory during the Halloween troll attack. Yet Ron and Hermione were also out and about that evening. (Hermione was only there because she wasn't aware of the edict to go back to the dormitories - but Quirrell wouldn't have known this since Hermione lied to McGonagall about her reasons for being there). Surely if Harry being caught fighting the troll made him a target then Ron and Hermione should have been targets too?


Yet Quirrell chose to try and kill Harry on the Quidditch pitch, the one place where he knew the trio couldn't be attacked together. His methods and his language suggest that he wasn't interested in Ron or Hermione.


He wasn't acting out of ignorance. Quirrell knew that Ron and Hermione were with Harry on Halloween because he discovered the trio together with the troll that night, alongside the other teachers.



A moment later, Professor McGonagall had come bursting into the room, closely followed by Snape, with Quirrell bringing up the rear. Quirrell took one look at the troll, let out a faint whimper and sat quickly down on a toilet, clutching his heart.
(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 10, Hallowe'en).




Since Quirrell knew that Harry, Ron and Hermione had been out-of-bounds together at Halloween why didn't he try and kill all three of them? Why did he only try to kill Harry?



Answer



The Quidditch match was a good opportunity to make Harry's death look like an accident


The reason Quirrell made an attempt to kill Harry at the Quidditch match was because it was an opportunity too good to miss - after all, Quidditch is a dangerous and accident prone sport:



‘Er – have the Bludgers ever killed anyone?’ Harry asked, hoping he sounded offhand. ‘Never at Hogwarts. We’ve had a couple of broken jaws but nothing worse than that. ~ Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone - Chapter 10 : Halloween



So broken bones are pretty common. Wood's answer also seems to imply that, in places other than Hogwarts, there were some Quidditch fatalities.


Harry's broom in his first year, the Nimbus 2000, was a racing broom which (with its quick acceleration) might require skills beyond an average first-year's capabilities. It could be that Quirrell hoped people would think that Harry fell to his death due to his inexperience.



The original plan was probably make it appear an unfortunate Quidditch accident - a seeker too young to participate lost control of his faulty broom, and alas! died or suffered a brain injury.


It's much harder to get rid of three students at once without arousing suspicion. A death toll of three might have prompted investigation or even closing the school, which would have interfered with Quirrell's plans to get the Philosopher's Stone. Also, Quirrell probably thought that once Harry, 'the boy who lived', was incapacitated his friends wouldn't be that motivated to 'scurry around'.


Quirrell had to prioritize, and he considered Harry the most dangerous of the trio


In addition, Harry is Quirrell's primary target because he is famous for defeating Voldemort:



“Well,” said Riddle, smiling pleasantly, “how is it that you a skinny boy with no extraordinary magical talent—managed to defeat the greatest wizard of all time? How did you escape with nothing but a scar, while Lord Voldemort’s powers were destroyed?” ~Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - Chapter 17: The Heir of Slytherin



So naturally Voldemort, in all his appearances, had to prioritize whom to consider his most threatening enemies - including while possessing Quirrell. In this list Harry's name was probably higher up than Ron's and Hermione's.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF

tolkiens legendarium - Did Gandalf wear his Ring of Power throughout the trilogy?

After Gandalf discovered that Sauron was back and sent Frodo on his quest to Rivendell, did he continue to wear Narya (one of the Three Rings)? It seems like a huge risk to continue to wear it after the Nazgûl (Ringwraiths) started to try and reclaim the One Ring; if they managed to get the ring to Sauron, couldn't he be corrupted by his power? Whatever powers Narya bestows upon him couldn't possibly be worth the huge risk, could it? Answer When Sauron forged the one ring and put it on his finger, the other ring bearers were immediately aware of him and his intentions and removed their own rings. There is no reason why they couldn't merely do so again. As soon as Sauron set the One Ring upon his finger they were aware of him; and they knew him, and preceived that he would be master of them, and of all they wrought. Then in anger and fear they took off their rings. "Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age," Silmarillion