Skip to main content

harry potter - Why didn't Quirrell try to kill Ron and Hermione?


Quirrell attempts to assassinate Harry during the Quidditch match in Philospher's Stone.



"But Snape tried to kill me!"

"No, no, no. I tried to kill you. Your friend Miss Granger accidentally knocked me over as she rushed to set fire to Snape at that Quidditch match. She broke my eye contact with you. Another few seconds and I'd have got you off that broom. I'd have managed it before then if Snape hadn't been muttering a counter-curse, trying to save you."
"Snape was trying to save me?"
"Of course," said Quirrell coolly. "Why do you think he wanted to referee your next match? He was trying to make sure I didn't do it again. Funny, really...he needn't have bothered. I couldn't do anything with Dumbledore watching. All the other teachers thought Snape was trying to stop Gryffindor winning, he did make himself unpopular...and what a waste of time, when after all that, I'm going to kill you tonight."
Quirrell snapped his fingers. Ropes sprang out of thin air and wrapped themselves tightly around Harry.
"You're too nosy to live, Potter. Scurrying around the school at Hallowe'en like that, for all I knew you'd seen me coming to look at what was guarding the Stone."
(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 17, The Man with Two Faces).



Quirrell's stated chain of logic is that:



  • Harry had been scurrying around the school at Halloween.


  • This made Quirrell think that Harry may have realised that Quirrell wanted the Stone.

  • Quirrell concluded that Harry was "too nosy to live".

  • Quirrell tried to kill Harry during the Quidditch match.


Yet why was Harry singled out for murdering? If Harry was too nosy to live then surely Ron and Hermione were too? The event which sparked off Quirrell's attempted assassination was Harry being out his dormitory during the Halloween troll attack. Yet Ron and Hermione were also out and about that evening. (Hermione was only there because she wasn't aware of the edict to go back to the dormitories - but Quirrell wouldn't have known this since Hermione lied to McGonagall about her reasons for being there). Surely if Harry being caught fighting the troll made him a target then Ron and Hermione should have been targets too?


Yet Quirrell chose to try and kill Harry on the Quidditch pitch, the one place where he knew the trio couldn't be attacked together. His methods and his language suggest that he wasn't interested in Ron or Hermione.


He wasn't acting out of ignorance. Quirrell knew that Ron and Hermione were with Harry on Halloween because he discovered the trio together with the troll that night, alongside the other teachers.



A moment later, Professor McGonagall had come bursting into the room, closely followed by Snape, with Quirrell bringing up the rear. Quirrell took one look at the troll, let out a faint whimper and sat quickly down on a toilet, clutching his heart.
(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 10, Hallowe'en).




Since Quirrell knew that Harry, Ron and Hermione had been out-of-bounds together at Halloween why didn't he try and kill all three of them? Why did he only try to kill Harry?



Answer



The Quidditch match was a good opportunity to make Harry's death look like an accident


The reason Quirrell made an attempt to kill Harry at the Quidditch match was because it was an opportunity too good to miss - after all, Quidditch is a dangerous and accident prone sport:



‘Er – have the Bludgers ever killed anyone?’ Harry asked, hoping he sounded offhand. ‘Never at Hogwarts. We’ve had a couple of broken jaws but nothing worse than that. ~ Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone - Chapter 10 : Halloween



So broken bones are pretty common. Wood's answer also seems to imply that, in places other than Hogwarts, there were some Quidditch fatalities.


Harry's broom in his first year, the Nimbus 2000, was a racing broom which (with its quick acceleration) might require skills beyond an average first-year's capabilities. It could be that Quirrell hoped people would think that Harry fell to his death due to his inexperience.



The original plan was probably make it appear an unfortunate Quidditch accident - a seeker too young to participate lost control of his faulty broom, and alas! died or suffered a brain injury.


It's much harder to get rid of three students at once without arousing suspicion. A death toll of three might have prompted investigation or even closing the school, which would have interfered with Quirrell's plans to get the Philosopher's Stone. Also, Quirrell probably thought that once Harry, 'the boy who lived', was incapacitated his friends wouldn't be that motivated to 'scurry around'.


Quirrell had to prioritize, and he considered Harry the most dangerous of the trio


In addition, Harry is Quirrell's primary target because he is famous for defeating Voldemort:



“Well,” said Riddle, smiling pleasantly, “how is it that you a skinny boy with no extraordinary magical talent—managed to defeat the greatest wizard of all time? How did you escape with nothing but a scar, while Lord Voldemort’s powers were destroyed?” ~Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - Chapter 17: The Heir of Slytherin



So naturally Voldemort, in all his appearances, had to prioritize whom to consider his most threatening enemies - including while possessing Quirrell. In this list Harry's name was probably higher up than Ron's and Hermione's.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...
Post a Comment
Read more

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...
Post a Comment
Read more

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...
Post a Comment
Read more