Skip to main content

star wars - How confident were they before testing the DeathStar/Starkiller?



When the Empire/First Order tested their respective super weapons, a lot of their forces and main command are either on board or nearby. This means that they must have been very confident in its ability and that it wouldn't malfunction and just explode.


Is there any information, in either case, how confident they were in it? Like had they done small scale testing of all the parts, etc etc



Answer



In Legends, you had Maw Installation where Tarkin had the Death Star developed. They constructed a prototype (basically just the frame and super-laser) and it was powerful enough to destroy the moon of Kessel.


Canon no longer indicates that there was any such prototype. There's also indications that the Death Star itself had been in planning stages for a very long time before the Clone Wars. It's first mentioned in Episode II, where the plans were in Count Dooku's possession and were a closely guarded secret. There's no indications that the plans were still being worked on at the time. This seems to be a final design.


And then, at the end of Episode III, we see the framework is underway


The canon novel Tarkin mentions nothing about a prototype or testing either. There's just the main construction project, which suffers from setbacks and delays (plus the whispers of a super-weapon beginning to stir). That he was able to apparently hide such a massive project from public view for 20 years (and even from the rest of the Imperial forces) was an accomplishment itself.


Per Rogue One:



The Death Star was first tested on Jedah City in "single reactor mode". There was some uncertainty expressed by Tarkin before the test. The destruction was blamed on a mining accident.




We know pretty much nothing about StarKiller Base's construction. Testing of SKB seems even less likely than testing the Death Star. As mentioned in another answer



Also, how do you fire it (in any direction) without giving yourself away?



So let's talk practicalities here and speculate a bit. Both of these are epic projects in their own right. We're talking major logistics just to design something like this, let alone build it. So if you're going to even entertain the idea of building it (where you're committing the resources necessary to do this), you're going to have to have a fairly high degree of certainty that the underlying theories it's built on are well founded. Probably with some sort of small scale mockup. In other words, they probably did some sort of testing in the early design phases. Blow up an asteroid or two. The only thing that would change in the final project would be the size and scope (scalability). Still, I wouldn't want to be an engineer on that thing, hoping that the button push works the first time. Vader wasn't happy with failure.


TL;DR - They had to have a high degree of certainty that it would work before building it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

What is the etymology of Doctor Who?

I recently decided to watch Doctor Who, and started viewing the 2005 version. I have the first two episodes from the first season, and I can't help but wonder what is the etymology of the name "Doctor Who"? And why does the protagonist call himself "the Doctor" (or is it "the doctor")? Answer In the very first episode of Doctor Who (way back in 1963), the Doctor has a granddaughter going by the name "Susan Foreman", and the junkyard where the TARDIS is has the sign "I.M. Foreman". Barbara, who becomes one of the Doctor's companions, calls him "Doctor Foreman" (probably assuming that is his name given his relationship to Susan), and Ian (another early companion) does the same in the second episode, to which the Doctor says: Eh? Doctor who? What's he talking about? "Foreman" is most likely selected as a convenient surname for Susan to use because it happened to be on display near where the TARDIS landed....

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...