In the first Harry Potter book it shows that Harry was gotten by Hagrid, instead of Dumbledore. Why didn't Dumbledore get Harry himself, after Harry's parents died?
Dumbledore was stronger than Hagrid, Hagrid had less skill.
The most I can think is that Hagrid (since he was part giant) would be immune to some spells, like he was immune to the stunning spells they shot at him in the 5th book.
Answer
I can't provide a citation, but I would suggest, that there was a lot of trouble after the death of the Potters and Voldemort vanishing...
I can't exactly figure it out, but I'm sure Dumbledore had many things to organize, make sure the ministry does the right things, protect witches and wizards from masterless-turning-mad death eaters etc... This was a task where all his expertise was needed. To be honest, Hagrid would not have been much help with that, would he?
But given his (giant) immunity against spells, his strength, necessary to rescue Harry from the ruins of the house, and his unquestionable loyalty to Dumbledore he was exact the right person to do it while Dumbledore was doing politics and casting protection spells to ensure Harrys future. And the task seemed not to be that dangerous - Voldemort was gone, and there wasn't an army of death eaters around the house.
Comments
Post a Comment