Skip to main content

star trek - Why doesn't Starfleet have personal shields?


In the Next Generation episode A Fistful of Datas Worf is able to build a personal shield out of a telegraph machine and a standard issue communicator. Although Worf says it is highly unstable and won't last more than fifteen seconds, this is likely due more to the limited tools, technology and time that Worf had available to build it with than to the concept itself.


Once off the holodeck, why doesn't Worf or Starfleet research and developed a proper personal shield for personnel to use? It would make sense to have as standard equipment, stored right next to the hand phasers for away teams or supplied to troops deployed in a war. Even if it could only absorb a single shot before failing, that's still better than nothing.



Answer



They do have them, in large numbers. They just don't generally use them because...erm...mumbles incoherently


In DS9 : Homefront, there's mention that there are sufficient on Earth to equip an entire army;



"LEYTON: Mister President, we can use the Lakota's transporters and communications system to mobilise every Starfleet officer on Earth in less than twelve hours. We've been preparing for something like this for a long time. We have stockpiles of phaser rifles, personal forcefields, photon grenades, enough to equip an entire army. I can start getting men on the streets immediately.


JARESH-INYO: What you're asking me to do is declare martial law.




I think we can reasonably assume from Jaresh Inyo's instantly negative response that using personal shields is anathema to the Federation's principles of peace and viewed as the first step on the road to a police state.


On top of that, there's no real evidence that they'd be especially useful. There's a passing reference in DS9: "Business as Usual" that the sort of hand-held particle weapons that can be openly purchased would easily overmatch the sort of protection offered by a small personal shield



QUARK : The Breen CRM-one-fourteen works equally well against moving vessels or surface emplacements. It's guaranteed to cut through reactive armor in the six-to-fifteen centimeter range, and shields up to four-point-six gigajoules.



Admittedly this weapon is a very serious (and expensive) piece of kit, but I think we can presume that other races' standard particle weapons would be able to produce at least a reasonable fraction of this figure. Since the energy output of a communicator-sized battery would be tiny in comparison, the shield would be next to useless.


Breen CRM-114


Having said all that, we do see some applications of personal shield technology in Star Trek : The Animated Series, with the use of shield-based portable life-support systems. These are only used a couple of times but the principle seems solid;


portable life-support systems


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

harry potter - Do the Kwikspell courses work?

In Harry Potter we are introduced to Kwikspell course in The Chamber of Secrets (and never hear about it again). We see Filch taking courses, presumably by mail. The descriptions of Kwikspell make me think it is for people who are weak in magic (kind of like how Neville was supposed to be when he was younger), but had magic in them nonetheless. However, Ron's comments later in the chapter make it sound like it is mainly for Squibs to learn magic. However, it is strongly implied through out all the books that Squibs are essentially Muggles, and will never be able to do magic. How then is a Kwikspell course supposed to work? Do we have any information to know if it works at all? Is it a scam? An answer from any level of canon is welcome. Answer Kwikspell courses are (probably) useful to some wizards, but not to squibs. The Kwikspell course literature comes with two testimonials. Madam Z. Nettles of Topsham writes: ‘I had no memory for incantations and my potions were a family joke...

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...