Skip to main content

video games - What has the destruction of the World Stone done to Sanctuary?


At the end of Diablo 2 Baal destroys the Worldstone, but I'm really hazy on the purpose of the 'World Stone'. Are there any official explanations, in a novel or statement by blizzard what the stone's destruction did to Sanctuary? How does this lead into the story of the next game?



Answer




Executive Summary: The destruction of the Worldstone had devastating physical effects to the Arreat Summit's immediate surrounds - turning it into a massive crater and poisoning the land. But it had a more interesting effect: with the Worldstone no longer actively reducing humankind's powers, they are reverting to nephalem with the associated powers that they once held.


Full Explanation:


The purpose of the Worldstone was two-fold.


The first is revealed in the novel, The Veiled Prophet. The Worldstone was the foundation for Sanctuary, as it was used to create it:



he cannot be touched, for he’s tied to the very foundation of Sanctuary, the Worldstone!



and



Distance had no meaning where the Worldstone was concerned. Though it physically appeared to be hundreds of miles away, it was, in truth, everywhere.




Tyreal makes reference to this in Diablo III as well:



Tyrael:


Since time immemorial, the forces of Heaven and Hell fought for control of the sacred Worldstone... until the day it was stolen by renegades and used to forge your world.



The Book of Cain also touches on it:



Inarius succeeded in manipulating the power of the stone to create the world of Sanctuary.




The second use came later, when it was changed to restrict the powers of the nephalem to reduce them into mere mankind:



Tyrael: To escape the Eternal Conflict, a group of renegade angels and demons came together and created a hidden paradise for themselves. They called this world Sanctuary.


Eventually, they commingled. They gave birth to mankind. That is why you have both good and evil within you... and the power of both realms as your birthright.


The power of your nephalem ancestors was so terrifying to their parents that they tuned the Worldstone to weaken them. They knew they had loosed something... unimaginable upon creation.



and



Deckard Cain: The Worldstone was an ancient artifact of immense power. It was used not only to create our world, but also to control mankind.


The original humans were known as the nephalem, and their power was such that it was feared they would tip the balance in the Eternal Conflict between the High Heavens and the Burning Hells.



So the Worldstone was tuned to lessen our powers, turning mankind into what we are today.



And from the Book of Cain:



Inarius then attuned the Worldstone to cause the powers of the nephalem to diminish over time.



Destroying the Worldstone could have effects on either of these purposes. Obviously it did not destroy Sanctuary as could have been reasonably expected, and equally obviously it did have a physical effect - it created the Arreat Crater where Azmodan has set up his base:



Deckard Cain: Tyrael was forced to destroy the Worldstone when Baal, the Lord of Destruction, corrupted it in his attempt to control all of mankind. ... It obliterated Mount Arreat, the mountain that housed it, leaving only a smoking crater in its place.




The Book of Cain:



the surrounding area was devastated. To this day, toxic clouds of ash and choking arcane dust hang like a shroud over the land. The decimation was so utterly calamitous that this region is now known as the Dreadlands.



However there is reason to believe destroying it did affect the weakening of the mankind, restoring them to their status as nephalem:



Deckard Cain: So the Worldstone was tuned to lessen our powers, turning mankind into what we are today. But now that it has been destroyed, it is conceivable that the powers of the nephalem will reappear.



This become explicit throughout Diablo III as the remaining Evils, Belial and Azmodan, as well as the Angels encountered in the Heavens all repeatedly refer to the player character as "nephelam", implying that they also believe that humans are regrowing to the powers initially possessed by their nephelam ancestors.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Was the "pure soul" of Harry's what had really hurt Voldemort?

In the Order of the Phoenix, Voldemort possesses Harry, and it hurts. Greatly. I think that Dumbledore explained that it was because Voldemort's rotten soul was incapable of assimilating Harry's pure soul, that Voldemort didn't understand the love and friendship etc that Harry has in his heart. But, I think it was a lie. Remember that in Deathly Hallows, while looking for information regarding Horcruxes, it is discovered that it is in fact possible to merge a soul fragment back, but that the process was extremely painful. Now then, if Voldemort tried to possess Harry, and Harry had a fragment of Voldemort's soul, I think that it could have been the true cause of Voldemort's pain: the fact of having his soul so close of another fragment. I think that Dumbledore knew that fact, but had to lie to Harry because it was inappropriate to let him know that he had one of Voldemort's soul fragments at the moment. Is that right? Or was it truly the pure soul of Harry's...

languages - Do we ever see written English in the Star Wars films?

In Empire Strikes Back , we see a transcription of what R2's beeps and bloops mean, but it's not English (sorry for the low quality, it's from the 2004 DVDs): I'd assume it's what Basic looks like when written, but is there some point in the the Star Wars films we see written English instead? (This sort of spun off from a discussion in How do people understand astromech droids? .) Answer At one point there was English but it has been phased out in subsequent versions of the films. Chris Gould at DVD Active did a comparison of all versions of each of the Star Wars films, and in his comparison of Episode 4 , there are a couple of screenshots showing how the power gauge for the Death Star tractor beam was changed. I imagine there are probably more to be found in his other comparisons but I haven't got around to reading those yet.

star wars - What "exactly" happens when someone turns to the Dark Side?

When I saw the original Star Wars saga as a kid, the concept of the Dark Side imprinted in me was quite simple. You did a bad thing, so you're a bad person so you go to the Dark Side and keep doing bad things. Now, obviously this doesn't hold true in reality. In my mind it is perfectly reasonable for Luke to kill the Emperor and Vader and then just flee the Death Star and rejoin the Alliance. After all they are at war, those are enemy officers that have captured him and are taunting him by threatening with death of all loved ones and the whole operation was intended to kill the Emperor anyway. The same would hold true for Anakin. He could have killed Mace Windu to save the Chancellor and Padme but that doesn't mean he's going to then go mad and kill all Jedis including children. It doesn't add up from a merely psychological point of view. He had a set of objectives and that made him want to keep the Chancellor alive (quite valid by the way, Mace Windu is quite clums...

star trek - Warning regarding forward saucer section in Nemesis?

In Star Trek: Nemesis , just before the Enterprise rams into the Scimitar, Picard sends a text message from his captain's chair arm pad to Troi — who is manning the helm in lieu of the crewman who was just blown out through what was once the view screen — indicating that she should put full impulse on standby. (Literally, if you watch the scene closely, Troi's console prefaces the order with "TXT MSG" !) My question is: Did Picard also somehow warn crew members in the forward saucer section about what was about to happen? The ramming of the Scimitar was a heat of the moment decision. Considering that he also resorted to calling the auto-destruct sequence shortly after (which ended up being offline), he probably was of the mindset that any losses would be acceptable in order to hault Shinzon's march to Earth. Still, I'm curious. Answer The original script indicates that he called for the crew to " brace for impact ". Whether that call (or the comma...