Skip to main content

tolkiens legendarium - Why do the Rohirrim apparently find the H-word offensive?


In LOTR: The Two Towers, Gimli and Éomer have the following dialogue:



Gimli: Give me your name, Horse-master, and I shall give you mine.


Éomer: I would cut off your head, dwarf, if it stood but a little higher from the ground.



That seems like a bit of an overreaction on Éomer's part. The People of Rohan are known to be master equestrians and are often referred to as Horse-Lords which admittedly is more flattering than Horse-master.


The H-word strikes again in LOTR: The Return of the King when Gandalf goes to Isengard with Théoden and the fellowship.


Saurman uses the same "insult" for Théoden King, among many others.




Saruman: A man of Rohan? What is the house of Rohan but a thatched barn where brigands drink in the reek and rats roll on the floor with the dogs?


Victory at Helm's Deep doesn't belong to you, Théoden Horse-Master! (Scornful emphasis at Horse-Master). You are a lesser son of greater sires.



The King looks upset but ignores Saruman and continues persuading Grima to come down from Orthanc.


However, it must be noted that Théoden might not have been upset at being called Horse-Master as there were a variety of other insults. And even if he was upset at that, it could just be that Saruman didn't accord him his regnal title and instead addressed him as a lowly Horse Master.


In any case, is there some history behind this term that I am missing due to watching just the movies? Is it considered offensive by the Rohirrim in the books as well?


What is the context of this term's usage in the books?



Answer



What you're seeing here is Peter Jackson adapting the films to try to make the plot more interesting, detracting from the books.



This is common occurrence in the films as Peter wanted to change the tone of certain scenes to build the tensions quicker than those in Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings


The phrase itself is not meant as an offence to the Riddermark, however in doing so creates early tensions and suspense in the films. The term Horsemaster occurs many times in the earlier versions of the Legendarium as a name for the Riders of the Riddermark and is used by Tolkien himself to describe the people of Rohan 1


Firstly, the exchange between Gimli and Éomer. (Apologies for the long passage, and the emphasis is mine)



“The Rider looked at them with renewed wonder, but his eyes hardened. ‘Then there is a Lady in the Golden Wood, as old tales tell!’ he said. ‘Few escape her nets, they say. These are strange days! But if you have her favour, then you also are net-weavers and sorcerers, maybe.’ He turned a cold glance suddenly upon Legolas and Gimli. ‘Why do you not speak, silent ones?’ he demanded.


Gimli rose and planted his feet firmly apart: his hand gripped the handle of his axe, and his dark eyes flashed. ‘Give me your name, horse-master, and I will give you mine, and more besides,’ he said.”


“As for that,’ said the Rider, staring down at the Dwarf, ‘the stranger should declare himself first. Yet I am named Éomer son of Éomund, and am called the Third Marshal of Riddermark.’


‘Then Éomer son of Éomund, Third Marshal of Riddermark, let Gimli the Dwarf Glóin’s son warn you against foolish words. You speak evil of that which is fair beyond the reach of your thought, and only little wit can excuse you.’


Éomer’s eyes blazed, and the Men of Rohan murmured angrily, and closed in, advancing their spears. ‘I would cut off your head, beard and all, Master Dwarf, if it stood but a little higher from the ground,’ said Éomer.”
The Two Towers - Book Three: Chapter 2, The Riders of Rohan




From this passage, we can see that PJ has clearly adapted the scene, from a discussion (albeit tense) about Galadriel and the Golden Wood, led to the threat of Gimli's head being cut off. Being named horse-master had in no way insulted Éomer, however being told he had "foolish words" was clearly the trigger here.


As for the passage with Saruman, again it is PJ twisting the original scene. In this case it is likely to build up to the death-by-a-wheel he has planned for Saruman in the Original Cut and needs the tensions to be high enough for it to seem natural that Saruman has died. In the novels however, it is Théoden who declares himself "A lesser son of great sires".



“So much for the House of Eorl. A lesser son of great sires am I, but I do not need to lick your fingers. Turn elsewhither. But I fear your voice has lost its charm.”


[..]


“Now his voice changed, as he slowly mastered himself. ‘I know not why I have had the patience to speak to you. For I need you not, nor your little band of gallopers, as swift to fly as to advance, Théoden Horsemaster.”



Before Saruman's "voice change" he went insulting the Horselords and their ancestors saying "What is the house of Eorl but a thatched barn where brigands drink in the reek...". Saruman however collects himself from the outrage infused by Theoden breaking Saruman's spell and returns to trying to use his words to win them again. Whether "Horsemaster" in this case is insulting I am unsure. It seems as if Saruman has the intent of insulting Théoden, however whether Théoden takes offence or not is unclear, especially since he goes on to talk to Gandalf and the conversation moves away from Théoden.





1


Trotter (Aragorn) uses it in its first instance to describe the land of the Riddermark after the three companions chase Merry and Pippin into the plains.



“You are looking out across the great pastures of Rohan, the Riddermark, land of the Horsemasters,' said Trotter”
Treason of Isengard: Chapter 17, The Great River



Some more instances of the term "Horsemaster" are listed below.



Of old all that lay between Limlight and Entwash belonged to the Horsemasters' (FR: 'all that lay between Limlight and the White Mountains belonged to the Rohirrim').
Treason of Isengard




In earlier drafts we see the above exchange to be slightly different.



“Give me your name, master of horses, and maybe I will give you mine, and other news,' answered Trotter.


'As for that,' said the rider, 'I am Eomer son of Eomund, Third Master of the Riddermark. Eowin the Second Master is ahead.”



There are more examples, but all descriptions of the Riddermark as opposed to insinuating insult.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

story identification - Animation: floating island, flying pests

At least 20 years ago I watched a short animated film which stuck in my mind. The whole thing was wordless, possibly European, and I'm pretty sure I didn't imagine it... It featured a flying island which was inhabited by some creatures who (in my memory) reminded me of the Moomins. The island was frequently bothered by large winged animals who swooped around, although I don't think they did any actual damage. At the end one of the moomin creatures suddenly gets a weird feeling, feels forced to climb to the top of the island and then plunges down a shaft right through the centre - only to emerge at the bottom as one of the flyers. Answer Skywhales from 1983. The story begins with a man warning the tribe of approaching skywhales. The drummers then warn everybody of the hunt as everyone get prepared to set "sail". Except one man is found in his home sleeping as the noise wake him up. He then gets ready and is about to take his weapon as he hesitates then decides ...

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...

tolkiens legendarium - Did Gandalf wear his Ring of Power throughout the trilogy?

After Gandalf discovered that Sauron was back and sent Frodo on his quest to Rivendell, did he continue to wear Narya (one of the Three Rings)? It seems like a huge risk to continue to wear it after the Nazgûl (Ringwraiths) started to try and reclaim the One Ring; if they managed to get the ring to Sauron, couldn't he be corrupted by his power? Whatever powers Narya bestows upon him couldn't possibly be worth the huge risk, could it? Answer When Sauron forged the one ring and put it on his finger, the other ring bearers were immediately aware of him and his intentions and removed their own rings. There is no reason why they couldn't merely do so again. As soon as Sauron set the One Ring upon his finger they were aware of him; and they knew him, and preceived that he would be master of them, and of all they wrought. Then in anger and fear they took off their rings. "Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age," Silmarillion