Skip to main content

the lord of the rings - Inconsistency on the Doors of Durin


I just read the following text on tolkiengateway.net:



The name Moria means "Black Chasm" and was a derogatory description of the place which the Dwarves did not like, and was given after Durin's Bane took over the city in the Third Age. It is therefore a mystery why that name appears on an inscription made in the Second Age, and made in consent with the Dwarves.



It discusses the inconsistency of the name Moria appearing on the Doors of Durin. Was Tolkien aware of this? Did he ever comment on this?


Edit:


I am not asking why the Dwarves dislike the name, but if they could see the future? How can the name Moria appear on the doors, which were built in the Second Age, when it was given in the Third Age?



Moria


Second Age:



A rare friendship sprang up between the Dwarves and the Elves of this new land. Eregion's ruler, Celebrimbor, helped to construct the famous and magical gate that became known as the West-gate of Moria..



Third Age:



In that time it was given a new name, Moria, the Black Pit.




Answer




In the Lord of the Rings Readers Companion (Hammond and Scull, so it may be considered of high authority so far as Tolkien scholarship goes) this question is dealt with, and the following options are considered as potential answers:



  • The name was given because Khazad-Dum was underground, not because of any particular horror or darkness (Elves being lovers of light and the green earth), and dates back further than is commonly accepted.

  • Celebrimbor foresaw the name.

  • A later craftsman reworked the inscription.

  • The "magic lettering" had re-arranged itself when Khazad-Dum came to be called Moria.

  • "Hadhodrond" (the Elves original name for Moria) was actually on the doors all along, but Gandalf just read out "Moria" when reading it aloud, in the same way as he read out "Hollin" where "Eregion" was inscribed. In this scenario it's assumed that the name "Moria" in the illustration was a mistake made by the illustrator of the Red Book.


Of these, the last one seems most credible, and in the absence of a canonical explanation from Tolkien (and being Hammond and Scull one must work on the basis that there is no canonical explanation) it's what I'm inclined to go with.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

futurama - How much time is lost in 'Time Keeps on Slippin''

In time Keeps on Slippin' , Farnsworth creates a basketball team which he matures by abusing Chronitons. This leads to time skipping forward by random, but ever increasing amounts. How much time was skipped in this way? Answer Unfortunately, I don't think a good estimate can be made for this, for two reasons: Many of the time skips move forward by an indeterminate amount of time. At one point, the Professor mentions localized regions of space skipping forward much more than others. We then see two young boys on the street below complaining about having to pay social security, only to suddenly become senior citizens and start complaining about wanting their money. Thus, each individual could have experienced a different amount of time skippage.
Post a Comment
Read more

harry potter - Did Dolores Umbridge Have Any Association with Voldemort (or Death Eaters) before His Return?

I noticed that Dolores Umbridge was born during the first Wizarding War, so it's very likely she wasn't a Death Eater then (but she is pretty evil -- who knows?). After that Voldemort was not around in a way that could affect many people, and most wouldn't know he was planning to rise again. During that time, and up through Voldemort's return (in Goblet of Fire ), did Umbridge have any connection with the Death Eaters or with Voldemort? Was she doing what she did on her own, or was it because of an association with Voldemort or his allies? Answer Dolores Umbridge was definitely not a good person. However, as Sirius points out, "the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters". Remember that he also says that he doesn't believe Umbridge to be a Death Eater, but that she's evil enough (or something like that). I think there are two strong reasons to believe that: Umbridge was proud to do everything according to the law, except when she trie...
Post a Comment
Read more

aliens - Interstellar Zoo story

I vaguely remember this story from my childhood: it was about an interstellar zoo that came to Earth with lots of bizarre and unusual species, and humans would file through and gape at all the crazy looking creatures from other planets. The twist came at the end when the perspective shifted to the other side of the bars and we discovered that the "creatures" were traveling through space on a kind of safari. They thought they were the visitors and we were the animals. Neither side knew that the other side thought they were the zoo creatures. Answer Got it. Zoo, by Edward D. Hoch. Published in 1958. Link to Publication History Link to PDF
Post a Comment
Read more

Which Doctor Who works are canon?

I have been watching a Doctor Who documentary and they mentioned that Paul McGann did audio stories so he wasn't just a one-hit Doctor (and that there are novels featuring his Doctor as well). My question is: is Doctor Who canon just the show, or is it like Star Wars where some books and audios are canon and some are not? The documentary also shows that before 2005 they did audio stories where the Doctor is female and obviously that cannot be — not the female part, but the show doesn't count any female Doctors in episodes like The Day of the Doctor . Answer Nothing, and also everything The definitive piece of writing on Doctor Who canon is this blog post by writer Paul Cornell . I'm essentially going to be summarizing his post here, much less eloquently, but one section I want to quote directly is this: Nobody at the BBC has ever uttered a pronouncement about what is and isn't canonical. (As I'm sure they'd put it, being such enthusiasts for good grammar.) Be...
Post a Comment
Read more